Abstract:The rise of the commercial space industry has resulted in the development of mega‐constellations that promise to provide global broadband. These constellations capitalize on advancements in technology, improved modeling capabilities, and reductions in launch cost. One of the significant open questions is whether these constellations will significantly increase access for uncovered and underserved communities, in addition to serving existing markets. This paper analyzes which constellation characteristics provide the best global coverage at the lowest operational cost. First, we present the demand model that assesses the number of under‐served and uncovered users in a given region. Then, we present a genetic algorithm used to identify potential constellations. Finally, we conclude by identifying which characteristics are the most promising for broadband constellations, as well as predictions of how the market will develop in the coming years. Our analysis has found that geostationary (GEO) and medium Earth orbit (MEO) satellite constellations have the highest likelihood of profitability. LEO networks are on average 27% more expensive, but if designed wisely, they can be competitive. Our work shows that there are diminishing returns with large constellations, and that it is more cost effective to have a small number of highly capable satellites, rather than many low complexity satellites. Key technologies like high frequency bands and miniaturization of components can lead to further cost reductions and increase the competitiveness of LEO constellations. This paper analyzes which constellation characteristics provide the best global coverage at the lowest operational cost. Our analysis has found that geostationary and medium Earth orbit satellite constellations have the highest likelihood of profitability. LEO networks are more expensive, but if designed wisely, they can be competitive. Our work shows that there are diminishing returns with large constellations and that it is more cost effective to have a small number of highly capable satellites, rather than many low complexity satellites.

Low-Orbit Large-Scale Communication Satellite Constellation Configuration Performance Assessment

Optimization of Multiple Access Mode for Large-Scale Constellation Networking Communication

An Economic Evaluation Method for LEO Satellite Constellation Considering Revenue and Efficiency

Systematic Performance Evaluation Framework for LEO Mega-Constellation Satellite Networks

StarPerf: Characterizing Network Performance for Emerging Mega-Constellations

Analysis of Initial Deployment Strategy for Low-Orbit Large-Scale Constellations

STK-based Constellation Design and Performance Evaluation

Systematic Utilization Analysis of Mega-Constellation Networks

Architectural Decisions for Communications Satellite Constellations to Maintain Profitability While Serving Uncovered and Underserved Communities

Research on Satellite Occurrence Probability in Earth Station’s Visual Field for Mega-Constellation Systems

Uplink Interference and Performance Analysis for Megasatellite Constellation

Constellation Structure Design for LEO Mega-constellation with Optical Intersatellite Link

User-Driven Flexible and Effective Link Connection Design for Mega-Constellation Satellite Networks.

Ultra-Dense LEO Satellite Constellations: How Many LEO Satellites Do We Need?

Modeling and Analysis of Downlink Communications in a Heterogeneous LEO Satellite Network

A Multi-Area On-Demand Classification Constellation Design for Satellite IoT

Communication Constellation Design of Minimum Number of Satellites with Continuous Coverage and Inter-Satellite Link

Ultra-Dense LEO Satellite Constellation Design for Global Coverage in Terrestrial-Satellite Networks

Cost-Efficient LEO Navigation Augmentation Constellation Design under a Constrained Deployment Approach

A Techno-Economic Cost Framework for Satellite Networks Applied to Low Earth Orbit Constellations: Assessing Starlink, OneWeb and Kuiper