Abstract:The rise of the commercial space industry has resulted in the development of mega‐constellations that promise to provide global broadband. These constellations capitalize on advancements in technology, improved modeling capabilities, and reductions in launch cost. One of the significant open questions is whether these constellations will significantly increase access for uncovered and underserved communities, in addition to serving existing markets. This paper analyzes which constellation characteristics provide the best global coverage at the lowest operational cost. First, we present the demand model that assesses the number of under‐served and uncovered users in a given region. Then, we present a genetic algorithm used to identify potential constellations. Finally, we conclude by identifying which characteristics are the most promising for broadband constellations, as well as predictions of how the market will develop in the coming years. Our analysis has found that geostationary (GEO) and medium Earth orbit (MEO) satellite constellations have the highest likelihood of profitability. LEO networks are on average 27% more expensive, but if designed wisely, they can be competitive. Our work shows that there are diminishing returns with large constellations, and that it is more cost effective to have a small number of highly capable satellites, rather than many low complexity satellites. Key technologies like high frequency bands and miniaturization of components can lead to further cost reductions and increase the competitiveness of LEO constellations. This paper analyzes which constellation characteristics provide the best global coverage at the lowest operational cost. Our analysis has found that geostationary and medium Earth orbit satellite constellations have the highest likelihood of profitability. LEO networks are more expensive, but if designed wisely, they can be competitive. Our work shows that there are diminishing returns with large constellations and that it is more cost effective to have a small number of highly capable satellites, rather than many low complexity satellites.

An Economic Evaluation Method for LEO Satellite Constellation Considering Revenue and Efficiency

A Techno-Economic Cost Framework for Satellite Networks Applied to Low Earth Orbit Constellations: Assessing Starlink, OneWeb and Kuiper

Perturbed ISL Analysis in LEO Satellite Constellation

Low-Orbit Large-Scale Communication Satellite Constellation Configuration Performance Assessment

Research on Hopping Routing of Periodic Multiorbit LEO Satellites

Architectural Decisions for Communications Satellite Constellations to Maintain Profitability While Serving Uncovered and Underserved Communities

Systematic Utilization Analysis of Mega-Constellation Networks

Application Status and Analysis of Starlink Constellation

StarPerf: Characterizing Network Performance for Emerging Mega-Constellations

Systematic Performance Evaluation Framework for LEO Mega-Constellation Satellite Networks

Payload Scheme Research Based on Flexible Access Strategy of Satellite Constellation

Network Characteristics of LEO Satellite Constellations: A Starlink-Based Measurement from End Users

Techno-Economic Assessment of LEO Mega-Constellation with Multi-Satellite Collaboration

Study on the Connection Rate of LEO Communication Satellite

Spectral Efficiency of Low Earth Orbit Satellite Constellations

Ultra-Dense LEO Satellite Constellations: How Many LEO Satellites Do We Need?

Ultra-Dense LEO Satellite Offloading for Terrestrial Networks: How Much to Pay the Satellite Operator?

A Multifaceted Look at Starlink Performance

Sustainability assessment of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite broadband megaconstellations

T3P: Demystifying Low-Earth Orbit Satellite Broadband

Ultra-Dense LEO Satellite Constellation Design for Global Coverage in Terrestrial-Satellite Networks