Abstract:PurposeThis study aims to examine the behaviour of institutional and retail investors in response to news about industry leaders (peer firms) and to determine its impact on the stock prices of other firms (focal firms) within the same industry. Design/methodology/approachThe study investigates the impact of peer news on investor behaviour of Chinese A-shares listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2010 to 2019. The media coverage of industry leaders is sourced from prominent Chinese online financial outlets and the Chinese Financial Press. Support vector machine is applied to identify the positive, neutral and negative news within the articles. The study uses event study and logistic regression to examine the effects of peer news on focal firms' investor behaviour. FindingsThe results show that both good and bad news about leaders cause peers' stock prices to increase initially, but then reverse within one quarter. Further analysis reveals that when leaders' shares receive positive news coverage, institutional investors tend to exert excessive abnormal buying pressure on peers' shares, resulting in overreactions. Conversely, retail investors do not actively trade on peers on leaders' news day due to limited attention. In addition, the study shows that short-selling constraint inhibits bad news from reflecting in the stock prices. Originality/valueThe study highlights differences in investor behaviour. The finding that institutional investors tend to overreact more to peer firms' news when focal firms are smaller and have a lower frequency of information disclosure supports the salient theory. This is consistent with the previous framework that suggests overreaction is more pronounced when it is difficult to combine external sources of information to evaluate the focal firms. In contrast, retail investors do not engage in active trading on peers on leaders' news day due to the limited attention theory.

Anonymous Equity Research

LARGE CROWDS OR LARGE INVESTMENTS? HOW SOCIAL IDENTITY INFLUENCES THE COMMITMENT OF THE CROWD

Crowds on Wall Street: Extracting Value from Social Investing Platforms

Information Disclosure and Crowdfunding: an Empirical Analysis of the Disclosure of Project Risk

Value and Misinformation in Collaborative Investing Platforms.

Risk Disclosure in Crowdfunding

Peer Effects on Real-Time Search Behavior in Experimental Stock Markets.

What’s in a “username”? the Effect of Perceived Anonymity on Herding in Crowdfunding

Why Do Individual Investors Disregard Accounting Information? The Roles of Information Awareness and Acquisition Costs

Nothing but good intentions: the search for equity and stock price crash risk

Information disclosure source, investors’ searching and stock price crash risk

Social media analysts and sell-side analyst research

Crowdfunding Under Market Feedback, Asymmetric Information And Overconfident Entrepreneur

Peers' Media Coverage Releases and Investor Heterogeneity

Whose money is smart? Individual and institutional investors’ trades based on analyst recommendations

Does Public Disclosure Crowd out Private Information Production?

The Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on Information Asymmetry and Trading: an Intraday Analysis

Monetary Incentive and Stock Opinions on Social Media

The influence of upward social comparison on retail trading behaviour

Does the Public Availability of Market Participantss Trading Data Affect Firm Disclosure? Evidence from Short Sellers

Crowd characteristics and crowd wisdom: Evidence from an online investment community