Clinic- and laboratory-based measures of postural control in patellofemoral pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis and evidence gap map
Natanael P. Batista,Danilo De Oliveira Silva,Luis Mochizuki,Grant E. Norte,David M. Bazett-Jones
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.02.002
IF: 2.746
2024-02-05
Gait & Posture
Abstract:Background Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder associated with functional impairments. Although postural control is commonly assessed in people with PFP, there are inconsistent results regarding potential postural control deficits in this population. Research question This review aims to evaluate whether postural control is impaired in people with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and the effectiveness of interventions on postural control measures. Methods We searched six databases from their inception to May 5, 2023. We included studies assessing clinic- or laboratory-based postural control measures in people with PFP compared to pain-free controls, and intervention studies with PFP populations. We assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. We used random-effects meta-analyses considering subgroups based on type of task, measure, and intervention. Results Fifty-three studies were included. Very low certainty evidence indicated that people with PFP have shorter anterior (SMD=0.53, 95%CI:0.16,0.90), posteromedial (SMD=0.54, 95%CI:0.04,1.03) and posterolateral (SMD=0.59, 95%CI:0.11,1.07) reach distance, and worse composite score (SMD=0.46, 95%CI:0.22,0.70). Very low to moderate certainty evidence indicated that people with PFP have worse anterior-posterior and overall stability indexes during single-leg stance (SMD=-0.71, 95%CI:-1.29,-0.14; SMD=-0.63, 95%CI:-0.94,-0.32) and overall stability index during double-leg stance (SMD=-0.39, 95%CI:-0.78,-0.00), but no differences in center of pressure area during stair ascent (SMD=0.32, 95%CI:-2.72, 3.36). Low certainty evidence indicated that kinesio taping improved anterior reach distance (SMD=-0.49, 95%CI:-0.89,-0.09), while no significant differences were observed between pre- and post-intervention outcomes for conventional rehabilitation and rigid taping. Significance Clinicians should use clinic- (star excursion or Y-balance tests) and laboratory-based (stability indexes) measures to identify impairments of postural control in people with PFP. Low certainty of evidence suggests short-term improvement in postural control with kinesio taping.
neurosciences,orthopedics,sport sciences