Commentary: Inefficiencies in Digital Advertising Markets: Evidence from the Field

Jonathan Porter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920970133

IF: 15.36

2020-10-30

Journal of Marketing

Abstract:Journal of Marketing, Ahead of Print.

business

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Inefficiencies in Digital Advertising Markets

Brett R Gordon,Kinshuk Jerath,Zsolt Katona,Sridhar Narayanan,Jiwoong Shin,Kenneth C Wilbur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.09012

2020-02-22

Abstract:Digital advertising markets are growing and attracting increased scrutiny. This paper explores four market inefficiencies that remain poorly understood: ad effect measurement, frictions between and within advertising channel members, ad blocking and ad fraud. These topics are not unique to digital advertising, but each manifests in new ways in markets for digital ads. We identify relevant findings in the academic literature, recent developments in practice, and promising topics for future research.

General Economics
Online Platforms and Digital Advertising Market Study: Observations on the Statement of Scope

Damien Geradin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537856

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:I appreciate the opportunity to submit observations on the Statement of Scope (“SOS”) of the Market Study on “Online Platforms and Digital Advertising”. This Market Study is welcome given the importance of digital advertising for online content providers (which I will refer to as “publishers”), as well as the complexity and opacity of digital advertising markets. My research reveals that these markets do not function properly. They are ridden with conflicts of interest, leveraging practices, and their lack of competitiveness allows online platforms to generate supra-competitive rents to the detriment of advertisers, publishers and, ultimately, consumers. Investment in ad tech (i.e., the technologies developed and used by intermediaries between advertisers and publishers) has considerably declined. My observations are based on several recent research papers I have authored or co-authored on digital advertising, with a focus on online display advertising, and on the competitive relationship between online platforms and news publishers. They are also informed by earlier papers I wrote on two-sided markets, intermediation platforms, big data, and business models based on the offering of “free” services, which are monetized by selling advertising. The law and economics of online platforms has been one of my main areas of focus in the past decade.
“You Will:” A Macroeconomic Analysis of Digital Advertising

Jeremy Greenwood,Yueyuan Ma,Mehmet Yorukoglu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae067

2024-06-25

Abstract:Abstract An information-based model is developed where traditional and digital advertising finance the provision of free media goods and affect price competition. Digital advertising is directed toward specific consumers while traditional advertising is undirected. The equilibrium is suboptimal. Media goods, if valued by the consumer, are under provided with both types of advertising. Additionally, traditional advertising is excessive because it is undirected. The tax-cum-subsidy policy that overcomes these inefficiencies is characterized. The model is calibrated to the U.S. economy. Through the lens of the calibrated model, digital advertising increases welfare significantly. The welfare gain from the optimal policy is much smaller than the gain from digital advertising.

economics
Online Platforms and Digital Advertising Market Study: Observations on CMA’s Interim Report

Damien Geradin,Dimitrios Katsifis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537864

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper contains our personal observations on the CMA’s Interim Report on its Market Study on Online platforms and digital advertising (the “Interim Report”). As a starting point, we are very impressed by the quality of the Interim Report as it correctly identifies the competition issues raised by digital advertising and accurately discusses the complex mechanisms involved in digital advertising including real-time bidding (“RTB”). The CMA’s analysis is very much in line with our own research work on online display advertising, which is the area on which our comments will focus. Our observations are structured as follows. Part II contains some general observations on the Interim Report’s analysis of open display advertising. Part III discusses certain aspects of Google’s recent switch to a single unified first-price auction (the “Unified Auction”), which in our view warrant further investigation. Part IV provides our preliminary thoughts on Chrome phasing out third-party cookies. Part V concludes.
How Do Digital Advertising Auctions Impact Product Prices?

Dirk Bergemann,Alessandro Bonatti,Nicholas Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.08432

2024-04-24

Abstract:We present a model of digital advertising with three key features: (i) advertisers can reach consumers on and off a platform, (ii) additional data enhances the value of advertiser-consumer matches, and (iii) bidding follows auction-like mechanisms. We contrast data-augmented auctions, which leverage the platform's data advantage to improve match quality, and managed campaign mechanisms that automate match formation and price-setting. The platform-optimal mechanism is a managed campaign that conditions on-platform prices for sponsored products on the off-platform prices set by all advertisers. This mechanism yields the efficient on-platform allocation but inefficient off-platform allocations due to high product prices; it attains the vertical integration profit for the platform and advertisers; and it increases off-platform product prices and decreases consumer surplus, relative to data-augmented auctions.

Theoretical Economics,Computer Science and Game Theory
Pricing Power in Advertising Markets: Theory and Evidence

Matthew Gentzkow,Jesse M. Shapiro,Frank Yang,Ali Yurukoglu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20220943

IF: 10.7

2024-02-01

American Economic Review

Abstract:Existing theories of media competition imply that advertisers will pay a lower price in equilibrium to reach consumers who multi-home across competing outlets. We generalize and extend this theoretical result and test it using data from television and social media advertising. We find that the model is a good match, qualitatively and quantitatively, to variation in advertising prices across demographic groups, outlets, platforms, and over time. We use the model to quantify the effects of competition within and across platforms. (JEL G34, K21, L13, L82, M37)

economics
Parallel Experimentation and Competitive Interference on Online Advertising Platforms

Caio Waisman,Navdeep S. Sahni,Harikesh S. Nair,Xiliang Lin

2024-02-29

Abstract:This paper studies the measurement of advertising effects on online platforms when parallel experimentation occurs, that is, when multiple advertisers experiment concurrently. It provides a framework that makes precise how parallel experimentation affects the experiment's value: while ignoring parallel experimentation yields an estimate of the average effect of advertising in-place, which has limited value in decision-making in an environment with variable advertising competition, accounting for parallel experimentation captures the actual uncertainty advertisers face due to competitive actions. It then implements an experimental design that enables the estimation of these effects on <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://JD.com" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, a large e-commerce platform that is also a publisher of digital ads. Using traditional and kernel-based estimators, it shows that not accounting for competitive actions can result in the advertiser inaccurately estimating the advertising lift by a factor of two or higher, which can be consequential for decision-making.

General Economics,Applications
Double Marginalization and Misplacement in Online Advertising

Alexander White,Kamal Jain,Shota Ichihashi,Byung-Cheol Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3926873

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Internet users often visit multiple ad-financed websites as a bundle to fulfill their needs. We ask whether complementary websites have the right incentives to choose their advertising policies. We identify two forces that distort equilibrium away from the industry optimum and the efficient outcome. First, websites place more ads than the industry optimum (double marginalization). Second, given the total advertising volume at equilibrium, websites misallocate ads across websites (misplacement). Perfect competition in one market segment eliminates double marginalization but may exacerbate misplacement. The potential trade-off challenges conventional wisdom that competition would restore the industry optimum. Introducing micropayments removes misplacement, but the welfare consequences are ambiguous.
Is the Money Spent on Ad Platforms Worth It? the Role of Advertising Spillover in a Large-Scale Randomized Field Experiment

Yitian (Sky) Liang,Xinlei (Jack) Chen,Shengnan Han,Jinglong Zhang,Yubo Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4482611

2023-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Ad platforms such as Google and Meta have dominated the digital advertising market for years. However, brands have long been concerned about the advertising efficacy on ad platforms, especially given the skyrocketing advertising costs in recent years. In this study, we examine whether the advertising effect is underestimated when not accounting for the advertising spillover from ad platforms. In a large-scale randomized experiment on ByteDance in collaboration with an automobile brand, we show that exposed users are eight times more likely to convert outside than within ByteDance, which leads to a dramatic underestimation of the advertising effect if ignoring advertising spillover. In addition, advertising spillover affects firmsâ€™ targeting strategy. While the commonly used demographic variables by the automobile brand are effective for target marketing with only platform data, they are not when considering the conversions outside ByteDance. Instead, a behavioral variable proposed herein (prior brand home page visits) effectively moderates the advertising effect but has no effect when including only platform data in the analysis. Finally, when considering advertising spillover, the average cost per conversion, which brands commonly use to evaluate the cost of campaigns, shrinks by 5 or 25 times, depending on the methods used to calculate it.
Towards a Fairer Digital Marketing Model

Leo Ardon,Dario Morelli,Francesco Villani,David Wheatley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.05368

2022-01-14

Computers and Society

Abstract:Surfing on the internet boom, the digital marketing industry has seen an exponential growth in the recent years and is often at the origin of the financial success of the biggest tech firms. In this paper we study the current landscape of this industry and comment on the monopoly that Google has managed to gain over the years through technical innovations and intelligent acquisitions. We then propose potential avenues to explore in an effort to help moving the digital marketing industry towards a fairer model.
Incorporating Hidden Costs of Annoying Ads in Display Auctions

Valeria Stourm,Eric Bax

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.0710

2017-01-26

Abstract:Media publisher platforms often face an effectiveness-nuisance tradeoff: more annoying ads can be more effective for some advertisers because of their ability to attract attention, but after attracting viewers' attention, their nuisance to viewers can decrease engagement with the platform over time. With the rise of mobile technology and ad blockers, many platforms are becoming increasingly concerned about how to improve monetization through digital ads while improving viewer experience. We study an online ad auction mechanism that incorporates a charge for ad impact on user experience as a criterion for ad selection and pricing. Like a Pigovian tax, the charge causes advertisers to internalize the hidden cost of foregone future platform revenue due to ad impact on user experience. Over time, the mechanism provides an incentive for advertisers to develop ads that are effective while offering viewers a more pleasant experience. We show that adopting the mechanism can simultaneously benefit the publisher, advertisers, and viewers, even in the short term. Incorporating a charge for ad impact can increase expected advertiser profits if enough advertisers compete. A stronger effectiveness-nuisance tradeoff, meaning that ad effectiveness is more strongly associated with negative impact on user experience, increases the amount of competition required for the mechanism to benefit advertisers. The findings suggest that the mechanism can benefit the marketplace for ad slots that consistently attract many advertisers.

Computer Science and Game Theory
Advertiser Learning in Direct Advertising Markets

Carl F. Mela,Jason M.T. Roos,Tulio Sousa

2024-05-01

Abstract:Direct buy advertisers procure advertising inventory at fixed rates from publishers and ad networks. Such advertisers face the complex task of choosing ads amongst myriad new publisher sites. We offer evidence that advertisers do not excel at making these choices. Instead, they try many sites before settling on a favored set, consistent with advertiser learning. We subsequently model advertiser demand for publisher inventory wherein advertisers learn about advertising efficacy across publishers' sites. Results suggest that advertisers spend considerable resources advertising on sites they eventually abandon--in part because their prior beliefs about advertising efficacy on those sites are too optimistic. The median advertiser's expected CTR at a new site is 0.23%, five times higher than the true median CTR of 0.045%. We consider how an ad network's pooling of advertiser information remediates this problem. As ads with similar visual elements garner similar CTRs, the network's pooling of information enables advertisers to better predict ad performance at new sites. Counterfactual analyses indicate that gains from pooling advertiser information are substantial: over six months, we estimate a median advertiser welfare gain of \$2,756 (a 15.5% increase) and a median publisher revenue gain of \$9,618 (a 63.9% increase).

General Economics
PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING: Evolution, Efficacy, and Ethical Implications In The Digital Age

Onni Meirezaldi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v6i3.240

2023-10-03

Journal Publicuho

Abstract:The digital landscape has witnessed significant transformations over the past few decades, with programmatic advertising emerging as a pivotal force reshaping the world of brand communication. This article delves deep into the evolution of online advertising, highlighting the inefficiencies of traditional digital ad-buying methods that paved the way for the algorithmic and data-driven paradigm of programmatic advertising. While offering advantages like precision targeting, automation, scalability, and real-time analytics, programmatic advertising has challenges, especially concerning data privacy, regional nuances, and ethical considerations. Through a lens of global and regional case studies, the article underscores the intricate dynamics and cultural sensitivities crucial for successful campaigns. As we stand at the cusp of technological advancements, integrating Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, and 5G into the programmatic ecosystem promises further evolution. The article concludes with robust recommendations for researchers, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary studies, ethical considerations, and the need for continuous adaptation in this ever-evolving digital world.
Ghost Ads: Improving the Economics of Measuring Online Ad Effectiveness

Garrett A. Johnson,Randall A. Lewis,Elmar I. Nubbemeyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0297

IF: 6.1

2017-12-01

Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract:To measure the effects of advertising, marketers must know how consumers would behave had they not seen the ads. The authors develop a methodology they call “ghost ads,” which facilitates this comparison by identifying the control group counterparts of the exposed consumers in a randomized experiment. The authors show that, relative to public service announcement and intent-to-treat A/B tests, ghost ads can reduce the cost of experimentation, improve measurement precision, deliver the relevant strategic baseline, and work with modern ad platforms that optimize ad delivery in real time. The authors also describe a variant, “predicted ghost ad” methodology, which is compatible with online display advertising platforms; their implementation records more than 100 million predicted ghost ads per day. The authors demonstrate the methodology with an online retailer's display retargeting campaign. They show novel evidence that retargeting can work: the ads lifted website visits by 17.2% and purchases by 10.5%. Compared with intent-to-treat and public service announcement experiments, advertisers can measure ad lift just as precisely while spending at least an order of magnitude less.

business
The Attention Economy of Online Advertising

Alexander White,Kamal Jain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3363647

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Internet users often surf to multiple websites in order to accomplish a single task. When this happens, do these different sites face the right incentives when choosing their advertising policies? We build a model showing that websites face an interesting tradeoff: on the one hand, they are prone to over-advertise (similar to double marginalization); on the other hand, they tend to misallocate ads across sites (a distortion we call misplacement). Standard solutions to the double marginalization problem, such as adding competition among certain sites, make the misplacement problem more severe. This tradeoff is important for news aggregators and social networks, as it affects their decisions whether to link to external content providers or to expand the amount of content they offer by themselves. Understanding these incentives helps to inform the current debate regarding the concentration of influence among a small set of online platforms.
Efficiency of Ad Auctions with Price Displaying

Matteo Castiglioni,Diodato Ferraioli,Nicola Gatti,Alberto Marchesi,Giulia Romano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20423

2022-06-28

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract:Most economic reports suggest that almost half of the market value unlocked by artificial intelligence (AI) by the next decade (about 9 trillion USD per year) will be in marketing&sales. In particular, AI will allow the optimization of more and more intricate economic settings in which multiple different activities can be automated jointly. A relatively recent example is that one of ad auctions in which similar products or services are displayed together with their price, thus merging advertising and pricing in a unique website. This is the case, e.g., of Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor. More precisely, as in a classical ad auction, the ranking of the ads depends on the advertisers' bids, while, differently from classical ad auctions, the price is displayed together with the ad, so as to provide a direct comparison among the prices and thus dramatically affect the behavior of the users. This paper investigates how displaying prices and ads together conditions the properties of the main economic mechanisms such as VCG and GSP. Initially, we focus on the direct-revelation mechanism, showing that prices are chosen by the mechanisms once given the advertisers' reports. We also provide an efficient algorithm to compute the optimal allocation given the private information reported by the advertisers. Then, with both VCG and GSP payments, we show the inefficiency in terms of Price of Anarchy (PoA) and Stability (PoS) over the social welfare and mechanism's revenue when the advertisers choose the prices. The main results show that, with both VCG and GSP, PoS over the revenue may be unbounded even with two slots, while PoA over the social welfare may be as large as the number of slots. Finally, we show that, under some assumptions, simple modifications to VCG and GSP allow us to obtain a better PoS over the revenue.

English Else
An analytical model for comparing the profitability of competing online marketing channels: Search engine marketing versus e-commerce marketplace

Silvia Angeloni,Claudio Rossi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1879656

2021-03-11

Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice

Abstract:<span>Digital marketing offers entrepreneurs a variety of alternatives to market globally and generate revenues. Recent studies show that there is a strong research interest in developing analytical models to increase the firms' profit, by considering either key variables of specific advertising forms in isolation or cross-channel effects of online and offline channels. This article proposes a new analytical model, which assumes a trade-off between concurrent online marketing channels. Despite their different models, search engines and e-commerce platforms can be seen as competing in the same market when they are targeting the same set of consumers. Accordingly, advertisers need to constantly analyze which of the online activities perform better and why. The proposed model aims at capturing the main parameters a firm should carefully master in order to assess the effectiveness of alternative online channels in a comparative perspective, by suggesting the maximum cost per click that a firm should pay to benefit from search engine marketing, as much as from e-commerce platform.</span>
The Consumption of Advertising in the Digital Age: Attention and Ad Content

Anthony Dukes,Qihong Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4793

IF: 5.4

2023-06-06

Management Science

Abstract:This article studies the consumption of advertising when attention is costly. Our objective is to understand the advertiser’s optimal decision for informational and noninformational content when facing consumers with heavy distractions common in the digital age. We take an equilibrium approach in which an ad is consumed if and only if the content of the ad is worth the viewer’s attention. We classify many advertising decisions observed in practice. First, an advertiser can structure content to induce curiosity for continued viewing by showing the information that is relatively less likely to resonate with the broad audience. This tactic is evident in clickbait ads and “mystery ads.” Second, we find that digital ads, which tend to be skippable, have lower amounts of noninformational content (e.g., entertainment) relative to nonskippable ads. This finding can explain the industry perception that ads on digital media are of lower copy quality than traditional ads. This paper was accepted by Dmitri Kuksov, marketing. Funding: This work was supported by the Marketing Science Institute [Grant 4000790]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4793 .

management,operations research & management science
Fathoming Porter's five forces model in the internet era

G.D. Karagiannopoulos,N. Georgopoulos,K. Nikolopoulos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636690510628328

2005-12-01

Info

Abstract:Purpose To investigate the impact of the internet in “traditional” market rules. Design/methodology/approach An opinion piece based on Michael Porter's arguments for the new economy. Finding Michael Porter's arguments for the new economy provide a useful starting point in the analysis of the environment. His arguments are based on exaggerated phenomena. Factors that determine a sector's profitability could be enriched with the innovation that prevails in the particular sector. Originality/value An attempt to criticize Porter's thoughts regarding internet and industry structure and to enrich the Porter's five forces model with the “power of innovation”.
A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook

Brett R. Gordon,Florian Zettelmeyer,Neha Bhargava,Dan Chapsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3033144

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Measuring the causal effects of digital advertising remains challenging despite the availability of granular data. Unobservable factors make exposure endogenous, and advertising’s effect on outcomes tends to be small. In principle, these concerns could be addressed using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In practice, few online ad campaigns rely on RCTs, and instead use observational methods to estimate ad effects. We assess empirically whether the variation in data typically available in the advertising industry enables observational methods to recover the causal effects of online advertising. Using data from 15 US advertising experiments at Facebook comprising 500 million user-experiment observations and 1.6 billion ad impressions, we contrast the experimental results to those obtained from multiple observational models. The observational methods often fail to produce the same effects as the randomized experiments, even after conditioning on extensive demographic and behavioral variables. In our setting, advances in causal inference methods do not allow us to isolate the exogenous variation needed to estimate the treatment effects. We also characterize the incremental explanatory power our data would require to enable observational methods to successfully measure advertising effects. Our findings suggest that commonly used observational approaches based on the data usually available in the industry often fail to accurately measure the true effect of advertising.

Commentary: Inefficiencies in Digital Advertising Markets: Evidence from the Field

Inefficiencies in Digital Advertising Markets

Online Platforms and Digital Advertising Market Study: Observations on the Statement of Scope

“You Will:” A Macroeconomic Analysis of Digital Advertising

Online Platforms and Digital Advertising Market Study: Observations on CMA’s Interim Report

How Do Digital Advertising Auctions Impact Product Prices?

Pricing Power in Advertising Markets: Theory and Evidence

Parallel Experimentation and Competitive Interference on Online Advertising Platforms

Double Marginalization and Misplacement in Online Advertising

Is the Money Spent on Ad Platforms Worth It? the Role of Advertising Spillover in a Large-Scale Randomized Field Experiment

Towards a Fairer Digital Marketing Model

Incorporating Hidden Costs of Annoying Ads in Display Auctions

Advertiser Learning in Direct Advertising Markets

PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING: Evolution, Efficacy, and Ethical Implications In The Digital Age

Ghost Ads: Improving the Economics of Measuring Online Ad Effectiveness

The Attention Economy of Online Advertising

Efficiency of Ad Auctions with Price Displaying

An analytical model for comparing the profitability of competing online marketing channels: Search engine marketing versus e-commerce marketplace

The Consumption of Advertising in the Digital Age: Attention and Ad Content

Fathoming Porter's five forces model in the internet era

A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook