Abstract:Taking into consideration the seismic vulnerability and the poor energy performance of the European building stock, and the increasing socio‐economic and environmental need for integrating seismic upgrading with energy efficiency improvement, an experimental study involving the lateral load testing of full‐scale one‐story one‐bay masonry infilled RC frames and load‐bearing masonry walls was carried out in the framework of the SupERB research project aiming to investigate the efficiency of integrated seismic and energy upgrading systems. The integrated approach is based on the use of textile reinforced mortar (TRM) overlays combined either with traditional thermal insulation (extruded polystyrene, XPS) or with thermally efficient mortar incorporating phase change material (PCMs). The proposed integrated approach can be applied on the exterior face of the structure, so as to facilitate its application in real structures in the easiest possible way and with minimum disturbance to the inhabitants of the buildings. In this paper, only the structural performance of masonry‐infilled RC frames retrofitted with the proposed integrated approach is presented, while the energy benefits will be presented in a separate paper. Thus, in this paper, the structural performance of an integrated seismic and energy upgrading approach was assessed through five full‐scale one‐story one‐bay masonry infilled RC frames that were retrofitted with different schemes of TRM combined with thermal insulation materials subjected to in‐plane displacement‐controlled cyclic loading. The following parameters were investigated experimentally: the number of TRM overlays (one or two layers of TRM combined with thermal insulation), the use of thermally efficient PCM‐enhanced TRM layer in contrast to the use of conventional XPS insulation, and different retrofitting configurations (placement of the TRM in a sandwich form over and/or under the novel or the traditional insulation). From the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that all energy and seismic upgrading systems examined have a positive impact on the response of the structural system to cyclic loading, with the ones with two layers of TRM having a better performance compared to the ones with one layer of TRM and all of them a better performance than the control specimen. The use of two layers of TRM cancels the drawback of infilled frames, which at very small drifts they reach their maximum capacity and after that they rapidly fall to the capacity of the bare frame, providing capacities above 80% of their peak capacity for drifts up to 2%. In all the tests the TRM whether it was combined with XPS or included PCMs contributed to a better distribution of the cracks in the infill and delayed premature brittle failures. The presence of the TRM had also the advantage that it remained intact throughout the tests preventing the fall of debris out of the plane of the infilled frame, both in the retrofitted and unretrofitted sides.

Seismic out-of-plane retrofit of URM walls using timber strong-backs

Analytical formulation describing the behaviour of URM walls seismically strengthened using timber strong-backs

A SIMPLIFIED ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF TIMBER LIGHT-FRAME SHEAR WALLS

Bamboo Lightweight Shear Walls: Modeling and Identification of Sheathing-to-Framing Connections for Seismic Response Analysis

Full‐scale shake‐table tests on two unreinforced masonry cavity‐wall buildings: effect of an innovative timber retrofit

Timber-Based Strategies for Seismic Collapse Prevention and Energy Performance Improvement in Masonry Buildings

Experimental Evaluation of the In-Plane Stiffness of Timber Diaphragms

Parametric study on the in-plane performance of a steel frame retrofit solution for URM buildings using DEM

Title : In-situ out-of-plane testing of as-built and retrofitted unreinforced masonry walls 1

Seismic Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Walls with Various Retrofitting Methods

An Innovative, Lightweight, and Sustainable Solution for the Integrated Seismic Energy Retrofit of Existing Masonry Structures

Seismic performance of an existing RC structure retrofitted with buckling restrained braces

Lightly reinforced concrete walls in formwork blocks for the combined seismic and energy retrofit of masonry structures

Seismic assessment and dissipative bracing retrofit-based protection of infills and partitions in RC structures

A low-cost timber cladding system for the sustainable retrofit of masonry buildings: mechanical characterization under diagonal compression

Seismic retrofit cost model for Italian masonry residential buildings to support territorial-scale risk analysis

Seismic and energy upgrading of existing buildings—full‐scale testing of retrofitted masonry‐infilled RC frames

Seismic retrofitting of masonry infilled RC buildings in low-to moderate-seismic regions: case study of typical Sri Lankan school buildings

Cross‐laminated timber for seismic retrofitting of RC buildings: Substructured pseudodynamic tests on a full‐scale prototype

Integrated Seismic and Energy Retrofitting System for Masonry Walls Using Textile-Reinforced Mortars Combined with Thermal Insulation: Experimental, Analytical, and Numerical Study

Influence of masonry infills on seismic performance of BRB‐retrofitted low‐ductile RC frames