Abstract:<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Information disclosure is a top priority for official responses to the 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The information published by the authorities as a response to the crisis has been a cause of great concern to the public; however, there is limited evidence of any systematic analyses of the disclosed epidemic information. This in turn has important implications for risk communication. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to describe and compare the officially released content regarding the local epidemic situations and analyze the characteristics of information disclosure through local transmission for both the individual and total population levels in major cities of China. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> The 31 capital cities in mainland China were enrolled in a city-level observational study. Data were retrieved from local municipalities and health commission websites as of March 18, 2020. A checklist was employed as a rapid qualitative assessment tool to analyze the information disclosure performance of each city. Descriptive analyses and data visualizations were produced to present and compare the comparative performances of the cities. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> In total, 29 cities (93.5%) established specific COVID-19 webpages to disclose information. Among them, 12 of the city webpages were added to their corresponding municipal websites. A majority of the cities (21 of 31, 67.7%) published their first cases of infection in a timely manner on the actual day of confirmation. Regarding the information disclosures highlighted on the websites, news updates from local media or press briefings were the most prevalent (28 of 29, 96.6%), followed by epidemic surveillance (25 of 29, 86.2%) and advice for the public (25 of 29, 86.2%). Clarifications of misinformation and frequently asked questions were largely overlooked as only 2 cities provided this valuable information. The median daily update frequency of epidemic surveillance summaries was 1.2 times per day (interquartile range 1.0 to 1.3 times), and the majority of these summaries (18 of 25, 72.0%) also provided detailed information of confirmed cases. The reporting of key indicators in the epidemic surveillance summaries, as well as critical facts included in the confirmed case reports, varied substantially between cities. In general, the best performance in terms of timely reporting and the transparency of information disclosures were observed in the municipalities directly administered by the central government compared to the other cities. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Timely and effective efforts to disclose information related to the COVID-19 epidemic have been made in major cities of China. Continued improvements to local authority reporting will contribute to more effective public communication and efficient public health research responses. The development of protocols and the standardization of epidemic message templates—as well as the use of uniform operating procedures to provide regular information updates—should be prioritized to ensure a coordinated national response. </sec>

Government Transparency During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Good Information Governance?

Assessing the Indonesian government's compliance with the public information disclosure law in the context of COVID-19 data transparency

Risk Information Management and Social Media Platforms: A Strategic Agility of Local Governments to Prevent the COVID-19 Pandemic

Good governance and COVID‐19: The digital bureaucracy to response the pandemic (Singapore as a model)

Requestioning the Indonesia Government's Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Black Box Analysis for the Period of January–July 2020

Information Disclosure During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: City-Level Observational Study.

Indonesian Government Communication in Media Framing in Covid-19 Crisis Policy

Information disclosure during the COVID-19 epidemic in China: A city-level observational study (Preprint)

Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Fragmented Local Government Setting: a Study from Ogan Ilir Regency, Indonesia

Covid-19 Pandemic and Digital Public Awareness Platforms: Strategies, Solutions, and Tools of Communication and e-Government Data Management

Transparency and information sharing could help abate the COVID-19 pandemic

Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: information, decision-making and execution

Government Response Measures and Public Trust during the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Evidence from Around the World

Government Information Dissemination During Public Health Emergencies: An Analysis of China's Experiences

Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19

Mind the gap: Data availability, accessibility, transparency, and credibility during the COVID-19 pandemic, an international comparative appraisal

Hoaxes and infodemics: Digital transformation challenges (Case study on Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia)

Fostering Voluntary Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analytical Framework of Information Disclosure

E-Government Use, Perceived Transparency, Public Knowledge of Government Performance, and Satisfaction with Government: an Analysis of Mediating, Moderating, and Framing Mechanisms Based on the COVID-19 Outbreak Control Survey Data from China

Assessing Emergency Information Sharing between the Government and the Public during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Open Government Perspective

Public Trust in the Time of Pandemic: An Analysis of Social Networks in the Discourse of Large-Scale Social Restrictions in Indonesia