Enhancing oil recovery from high–temperature and high–salinity reservoirs with smart thermoviscosifying polymers: A laboratory study
Shiwei Li,Olivier Braun,Lionel Lauber,Thierry Leblanc,Xin Su,Yujun Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119777
IF: 7.4
2021-03-01
Fuel
Abstract:While polymer flooding represents an effective chemically enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process, the poor thermal stability and weak salt tolerance of commonly used partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) hindered such a technique to be used in high–temperature and high–salinity (HTHS) oil reservoirs. Here we examined the possibility to use two newly–developed smart thermoviscosifying polymers (TVPs), SAV–A and SAV–T, in comparison with currently used commercial EOR polymer, PT2500, in three types of simulated hostile oil reservoirs: 85 °C, 29,000 mg·L−1 NaCl, 1,000 mg·L−1 Ca2++Mg2+; 105 °C, 190,020 mg·L−1 NaCl, 10,000 mg·L−1 Ca2++Mg2+; 120 °C, 190,020 mg·L−1 NaCl, 10,000 mg·L−1 Ca2++Mg2+. It was found that both two TVPs presented thermo– and salt–viscosifying response at polymer concentrations higher than 0.2 wt% upon heating from 20 to 80 °C, with growing salinity from 32,000 to 220,000 mg·L−1, while only thermothinning behavior was observed for PT2500 under identical conditions. TVPs behaved better thermal stability than PT2500 where SAV–A topped the list, and both TVPs showed smooth propagation in the porous media. Higher recovery efficiencies of TVPs could be obtained compared with PT2500, especially at 105 and 120 °C, TVPs got recovery factor of 13.06% and 13.04% with only 0.21 wt% and 0.34 wt% polymer concentration, while merely obtained 9.52% and 8.21% recovery factor from PT2500 at polymer concentration as high as 1.4 wt% and 1.65 wt%, respectively. These findings may offer an alternative for chemical EOR in HTHS hostile environment.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical