Does the electrode amplification style matter? A comparison of active and passive EEG system configurations during standing and walking

Joanna E. M. Scanlon,Nadine Svenja Josée Jacobsen,Marike C. Maack,Stefan Debener
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15037
IF: 3.698
2020-12-03
European Journal of Neuroscience
Abstract:<p>It has been stated that active‐transmission electrodes should improve signal quality in mobile EEG recordings. However, few studies have directly compared active‐ and passive‐transmission electrodes during a mobile task. In this repeated measurements study, we investigated the performance of active and passive signal transmission electrodes with the same amplifier system in their respective typical configurations, during a mobile auditory task. The task was an auditory discrimination (1000 vs. 800 Hz; counterbalanced) oddball task using approximately 560 trials (15% targets) for each condition. 18 participants performed the auditory oddball task both while standing and walking in an outdoor environment. While walking, there was a significant decrease in P3 amplitude, post trial‐rejection trial numbers, and signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). No significant differences were found in signal quality between the two electrode configurations. Walking movement, SNR and P3 amplitude were test‐retest reliable between recordings. We conclude that adequate use of a passive EEG electrode system achieves signal quality equivalent to that of an active system during a mobile task.</p>
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?