Abstract:Debate has been warranted as a meaningful activity to promote students' higher-level thinking, such as critical thinking. However, traditional debate activities which are typically carried out in the physical classroom may meet some obstructions of limited time and space, which would result in the phenomenon that many participants act as silent watchers rather than mind exchangers. Moreover, it is hard to make a visualized record about the whole process and contents of the traditional debate activity. The current study aimed to explore the effects of argument map (AM)-supported online group debate activities on college students' critical thinking, including their depth and phases of critical thinking, and the relationship between students' depth of critical thinking and their number of speeches. In the study, an innovative argumentation construction way was designed. All students enrolled in a course could have a chance to attend the AM-supported online group debate activities and the whole process and outcomes of online group debate could be visualized by AM. At the same time, the effectiveness of the innovative activities was evaluated by content analysis of AM. A total of 42 sophomores in the undergraduate course named "Learning Sciences and Technology" were recruited to attend online group debate activities assisted by a web-based visualization tool named "ZJU Yuque" in 5 weeks. Newman's framework about the depth of critical thinking and Murthy's instrument of critical thinking phases were employed as guidelines. We found that 42 students' overall depth of critical thinking was gradually improved in an obvious way during the five online debate activities. The most frequent phases for students in the first and second team in online group debate activities include Understand -> Understand (U -> U), Recognize -> Understand (R -> U), and Understand -> Evaluate (U -> E). However, students' creating behaviors were not significantly generated. Teachers' real-time feedback was helpful for students' improvements of high-level thinking skills and their preparation for the next debate activity. Students' interviews found that students highly valued such online group debate activities because every student could have a chance to express their thoughts and they had enough time to prepare debate contents. Based on the findings, some implications were proposed for the better design and implementation of online group debate activities.

The Effect of Argument Mapping Supported with Peer Feedback on Pre-Service Teachers' Argumentation Skills

Exploring College Students’ Depth and Processing Patterns of Critical Thinking Skills and Their Perception in Argument Map(am)-Supported Online Group Debate Activities

Exploring the Effects of Argument Map-Supported Online Group Debate Activities on College Students' Critical Thinking

Analysis of pre-service teachers' argumentation-based academic writing process

The effects of blogging on pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking and self-efficacy

Argumentation skills mediate the effect of peer argumentation on content knowledge in middle-school students.

The effect of online argumentation activities workshop on pre-service science teachers’ climate change awareness

Peer Critiquing in Scientific Inquiry: Enhancing Preservice Teachers' Reasoning, Epistemic Knowledge, and Scientific Argumentation through Innovative Teaching Strategies in an Undergraduate Science Content Course

A study on the effectiveness of a teaching based on socio-scientific issues in the training of pre-service teachers

Microteaching and Peer Assessment in Mathematics Teaching Practice

The Effect of the Write, Talk, and Rewrite Dialogic Writing Treatment on Argumentative Texts: a Replication Study in Türkiye

The Effects of Reflective Thinking-based Teaching Activities on Pre-service Teachers’ Reflective Thinking Skills, Critical Thinking Skills, Democratic Attitudes, and Academic Achievement

Exploring the resonance between how mentor teachers experienced being mentored and how they mentor pre-service teachers during teaching practice

Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate teaching technologies into their classrooms: Examining the effects of teaching environments based on open-ended, hands-on and authentic tasks

Argumentation-supported educational comics as a teaching tool for environmental education

The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context

Teaching Written Argumentation to High School Students Using Peer Feedback Methods—Case Studies on the Effectiveness of Digital Learning Units in Teacher Professionalization

Examining the Effect of Peer and Self Assessment Practices on Writing Skills

Reflective practices in micro teaching from the perspective of preservice teachers: teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-reflection

Preparing Pre-Service Teachers for Computational Thinking Skills and its Teaching: A Convergent Mixed-Method Study

DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY SKILLS OF SCIENCE TEACHING THROUGH ARGUMENT-FOCUSED VIRTUAL LABORATORY APPLICATIONS