Abstract:Summary of the machine learning clustering methodology and results of the study. Clusters are identified using machine learning approach in the learning set population evaluating specific combinations of multiple characteristics. Then identified clusters are predicted and tested in the learning set to evaluate their association with outcomes. Finally, the reproducibility of the results of cluster analysis is tested in an external cohort (validation set). AF, atrial fibrillation; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; CCB, calcium channel blocker; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular death; CVH, cardiovascular hospitalization; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HFH, heart failure hospitalization; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; PAD, peripheral artery disease; PP, pulse pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; WBC, white blood cell. Aims Patients experiencing ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represent a diverse group. We hypothesize that machine learning clustering can help separate distinctive patient phenotypes, paving the way for personalized management. Methods and results A total of 8591 ischaemic HFrEF patients pooled from the EPHESUS and CAPRICORN trials (64 ± 12 years; 28% women) were included in this analysis. Clusters were identified using both clinical and biological variables. Association between clusters and the composite of (i) heart failure hospitalization or all‐cause death, (ii) cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization or all‐cause death, and (iii) major adverse CV events was assessed. The derived algorithm was applied in the COMMANDER‐HF trial (n = 5022) for external validation. Five clinical distinctive clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (n = 2161) with the older patients, higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and previous CV events; Cluster 2 (n = 1376) with the higher prevalence of older hypertensive women and smoking habit; Cluster 3 (n = 1157) with the higher prevalence of diabetes and peripheral artery disease; Cluster 4 (n = 2073) with relatively younger patients, mostly men and with the higher left ventricular ejection fraction; Cluster 5 (n = 1824) with the younger patients and lower CV events burden. Cluster membership was efficiently predicted by a random forest algorithm. Clusters were significantly associated with outcomes in derivation and validation datasets, with Cluster 1 having the highest risk, and Cluster 4 the lowest. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist benefit on CV hospitalization or all‐cause death was magnified in clusters with the lowest risk of events (Clusters 2 and 4). Conclusion Clustering reveals distinct risk subgroups in the heterogeneous array of ischaemic HFrEF patients. This classification, accessible online, could enhance future outcome predictions for ischaemic HFrEF cases.

Unsupervised machine learning generated clusters of left ventricular strain curves identifies patients in risk of heart failure and cardiovascular death following acute myocardial infarction

Utilizing echocardiography and unsupervised machine learning for heart failure risk identification

A machine learning-based approach for the prediction of periprocedural myocardial infarction by using routine data

Unsupervised Time-Series Clustering of Left Atrial Strain for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Identification and validation of ventricular rhythmic risk subgroups in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by clustering analysis including left ventricular strain analysis

Global longitudinal strain improves risk assessment after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a comparative prognostic evaluation of left ventricular functional parameters

Myocardial strain combined with clinical risk factors in the prediction of in-hospital heart failure among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Cardiac ultrasomics for acute myocardial infarction risk stratification and prediction of all-cause mortality: a feasibility study

Explainable machine learning using echocardiography to improve risk prediction in patients with chronic coronary syndrome

Myocardial Strain Measured by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Predicts Cardiovascular Morbidity and Death

Early Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-derived Cardiac Strain as a Predictor of Adverse Events and Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Reperfused STEMI: A Two-center Cohort Study

Machine Learning in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Nonlinear Model From Clinical and CMR Features Predicting Cardiovascular Events

Machine learning approach to identify phenotypes in patients with ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AI-based cluster analysis enables outcomes prediction among patients with increased LVM

[Predictive value of global longitudinal strain measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular remodeling after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multi-centered prospective study]

Cardiac Strain As a Predictor of Adverse Events and Ventricular Remodeling: A Cohort Study

Cardiac Strains for Prediction of Adverse Events and Ventricular Remodeling

Left atrial and ventricular longitudinal strain by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking improves prognostic stratification of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Prognostic Value of Segmental Strain After ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the EARLY Assessment of MYOcardial Tissue Characteristics by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (EARLY‐MYO‐CMR) Study

A machine learning-derived risk score to predict left ventricular diastolic dysfunction from clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Integration of two-dimensional echocardiography: A novel risk indicator for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction