Machine Learning in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Nonlinear Model From Clinical and CMR Features Predicting Cardiovascular Events

Kankan Zhao,Yanjie Zhu,Xiuyu Chen,Shujuan Yang,Weipeng Yan,Kai Yang,Yanyan Song,Chen Cui,Xi Xu,Qingyong Zhu,Zhuo-Xu Cui,Gang Yin,Huaibin Cheng,Minjie Lu,Dong Liang,Ke Shi,Lei Zhao,Hui Liu,Jiayin Zhang,Liang Chen,Sanjay K Prasad,Shihua Zhao,Hairong Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.04.013
Abstract:Background: The cumulative burden of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is significant, with a noteworthy percentage (10%-15%) of patients with HCM per year experiencing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). A current risk stratification scheme for HCM had only limited accuracy in predicting sudden cardiac death (SCD) and failed to account for a broader spectrum of adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters. Objectives: This study sought to develop and evaluate a machine learning (ML) framework that integrates CMR imaging and clinical characteristics to predict MACEs in patients with HCM. Methods: A total of 758 patients with HCM (67% male; age 49 ± 14 years) who were admitted between 2010 and 2017 from 4 medical centers were included. The ML model was built on the internal discovery cohort (533 patients with HCM, admitted to Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China) by using the light gradient-boosting machine and internally evaluated using cross-validation. The external test cohort consisted of 225 patients with HCM from 3 medical centers. A total of 14 CMR imaging features (strain and late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]) and 23 clinical variables were evaluated and used to inform the ML model. MACEs included a composite of arrhythmic events, SCD, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation-related stroke. Results: MACEs occurred in 191 (25%) patients over a median follow-up period of 109.0 months (Q1-Q3: 73.0-118.8 months). Our ML model achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.830 and 0.812 (internally and externally, respectively). The model outperformed the classic HCM Risk-SCD model, with significant improvement (P < 0.001) of 22.7% in the AUC. Using the cubic spline analysis, the study showed that the extent of LGE and the impairment of global radial strain (GRS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) were nonlinearly correlated with MACEs: an elevated risk of adverse cardiovascular events was observed when these parameters reached the high enough second tertiles (11.6% for LGE, 25.8% for GRS, -17.3% for GCS). Conclusions: ML-empowered risk stratification using CMR and clinical features enabled accurate MACE prediction beyond the classic HCM Risk-SCD model. In addition, the nonlinear correlation between CMR features (LGE and left ventricular pressure gradient) and MACEs uncovered in this study provides valuable insights for the clinical assessment and management of HCM.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?