Abstract:Introduction: Co-production is gaining increasing recognition as a good way of facilitating collaboration among different stakeholders, including members of the public. However, it remains an ambiguous concept as there is no definitive or universal model of co-production or clarity on what constitutes a good co-production approach. This paper draws on the reflections of the academic researchers, practitioners and public advisors involved in co-producing a priority-setting exercise. The exercise was conducted by the Primary and Community Health Services (PCHS) Theme of the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration for Kent, Surrey and Sussex (NIHR ARC KSS). Methods: We collected data through written and verbal reflections from seven collaborators involved in the PCHS priority-setting exercise. We used Gibbs' model of reflection to guide the data collection. We then analysed the data through an inductive, reflexive thematic analysis. Results: A common thread through our reflections was the concept of 'sharing'. Although co-production is inherently shared, we used the virtuous cycle to illustrate a sequence of sharing concepts during the research cycle, which provides the underpinnings of positive co-production outcomes. We identified six themes to denote the iterative process of a shared approach within the virtuous cycle: shared values, shared understanding, shared power, shared responsibilities, shared ownership and positive outcomes. Conclusion: Our results present a virtuous cycle of co-production, which furthers the conceptual underpinnings of co-production. Through our reflections, we propose that positive co-production outcomes require foundations of shared values and a shared understanding of co-production as a concept. These foundations facilitate a process of shared power, shared responsibilities and shared ownership. We argue that when these elements are present in a co-production exercise, there is a greater potential for implementable outcomes in the communities in which the research serves and the empowerment of collaborators involved in the co-production process. Public members' contributions: Three members of the public who are public advisors in the NIHR ARC KSS were involved in the priority-setting exercise that informed this paper. The public advisors were involved in the design of the priority-setting exercise and supported participants' recruitment. They also co-facilitated the focus groups during data collection and were involved in the data analysis, interpretation and preparation of the priority-setting report. For this current manuscript, two of them are co-authors. They provided reflections and contributed to the writing and reviewing of this manuscript.

User and Community Co-production of Public Value

Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services

Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions.

The co-production of public value in community development: can street-level professionals make a difference?

Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation: The case of Denmark

Building ethical awareness to strengthen co-production for transformation

A virtuous cycle of co-production: Reflections from a community priority-setting exercise

Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge

Voice, Choice and Power: Using co-production to develop a community engagement strategy for an ethnically diverse community

Co-production of privately owned public space: Who, why, when, and how?

Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model

From transactions to interactions: the value of co-creation processes within online brand consumer communities

What does 'co‐production' look like for food system transformation? Mapping the evidence across Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) projects

Using Focus Groups to Evaluate a Self-Assessment Approach to Coproduction Value Creation in an International Community of Practice: Phase 2 of the CO-VALUE Study

Breaking the Overton Window: on the need for adversarial co-production

Co-production: A resource to guide co-producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences

Turning Open Government Data into Public Value: Testing the COPS Framework for the Co-creation of OGD-Driven Public Services

Applying co-production principles in research: reflections from young people and academics

Applying models of co-production in the context of health and well-being. A narrative review to guide future practice

Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation