Abstract:Social media provides an essential platform for shaping and sharing opinions and consuming information in a decentralized way. However, users often interact with and are exposed to information mostly aligned with their beliefs, creating a positive feedback mechanism that reinforces those beliefs and excludes contrasting ones. In this paper, we study such mechanisms by analyzing the social network dynamics of controversial Twitter discussions using unsupervised methods that demand little computational power. Specifically, we focus on the retweet networks of the climate change conversation during 2019, when important climate social movements flourished. We find echo chambers of climate believers and climate skeptics that we identify based solely on the retweeting patterns of Twitter users. In particular, we study the information sources, or chambers, consumed by the audience of the leading users of the conversation. Users with similar (contrasting) ideological positions show significantly high (low)-overlapping chambers, resulting in a bimodal overlap distribution. Further, we uncover the ideological position of previously unobserved high-impact users based on how many audience members fall into either echo chamber. We uncover the ideology of more than half of the retweeting population as either climate believers or skeptics and find that the cross-group communication is small. Moreover, we find that, while the echo chamber structures are consistent throughout the year, most users inside the echo chambers change from one week to the next, suggesting that they are a stable emergent property of the Twittersphere. Interestingly, we detect a significant decrease in polarization and a significant increase on the number of climate skeptics that coincides with the main #FridaysForFuture strikes during September, 2019.

How do transnational public spheres emerge? Comparing news and social media networks during the Madrid climate talks

Communicating environmental issues across media: an exploration of international news flows between twitter and traditional media

Communication strategies in the climate change debate on Facebook. Discourse on the Madrid Climate Summit (COP 25)

Quantifying the structure of controversial discussions with unsupervised methods: a look into the Twitter climate change conversation

The spatial difference of multi-layer climate change information flow and network construction: A comparison of "dual carbon" scenarios

Beyond climate change? Environmental discourse on the planetary boundaries in Twitter networks

A network perspective on intermedia agenda-setting

Digital city diplomacy and international cities networks: Collaboration and city branding strategies around climate issues

Understanding Opinions Towards Climate Change on Social Media

New approaches to understanding the role of the news media in the formation of public attitudes and behaviours on climate change

A cross-platform analysis of polarization and echo chambers in climate change discussions

Social Media News: A Comparative Analysis of the Journalistic Uses of Twitter

Does the Public Discuss Other Topics on Climate Change Than Researchers? A Comparison of Explorative Networks Based on Author Keywords and Hashtags.

Climate action on Twitter: perceived barriers for actions and actors, and sentiments during COP26

Predictors of International News Flow: Exploring a Networked Global Media System

Growing polarisation around climate change on social media

National Prisms of a Global Phenomenon: A Comparative Study of Press Coverage of Climate Change in the US, UK and China

Is Twitter a Public Sphere for Online Conflicts? A Cross-Ideological and Cross-Hierarchical Look

Climatechange Vs. Globalwarming: Characterizing Two Competing Climate Discourses on Twitter with Semantic Network and Temporal Analyses#.

Bridging Nations: Quantifying the Role of Multilinguals in Communication on Social Media

Who talks about what? Comparing the information treatment in traditional media with online discussions