Crediting agricultural soil carbon sequestration

Joseph Rudek,Jonathan Sanderman,Emily E. Oldfield,Alison J. Eagle,Rachel L. Rubin,Doria R. Gordon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl7991

IF: 56.9

2022-03-18

Science

Abstract:Regional consistency is necessary for carbon credit integrity

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Calcium Carbonate Regulates Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation by Mediating Microbial Communities in Northern China

Xiaolu Dou,Jiabao Zhang,Congzhi Zhang,Donghao Ma,Lin Chen,Guixiang Zhou,Jingwang Li,Yan Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107327

IF: 6.367

2023-01-01

CATENA

Abstract:Mineral organic complexes are essential for the storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) in agricultural soils. They are also affecting the CO2 emission reduction goals of known as the "double carbon target" (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality), as well as a landing point for achieving the 4 per 1,000 carbon enhancement initiative. As a typical soil mineral, calcium (Ca) plays a very critical role in regulating the accumulation of global organic carbon. Although calcium carbonate (CaCO3) has been shown to mediate the SOC accumulation process, especially in northern China, the relationship between Ca and SOC, and the underlying microbial mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, five soils (black soil, light chernozem soil, fluvo-aquic soil, sierozem soil, and loess soil) with different CaCO3 contents (4.29, 17.45, 98.66, 131.85, 143.82 g/kg, respectively) were selected to reveal the relationship among CaCO3, the SOC fraction and the chemical structure, and the bacterial community. The content of CaCO3 was determined by the gas volume method. Solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to analyze the chemical structure of SOC, and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was used to analyze the bacterial community. The results showed that the contents of particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MOC) in macro-aggregates were higher than that in microaggregates, and that POC was significantly higher than MOC in soil with high CaCO3. With an increase in the CaCO3 content, there was a decrease in the proportion of aromatic C and alkyl C, but an increase in the proportion of O-alkyl C in SOC, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Chloroflexi grew, and that of Acidobacteria decreased. Moreover, the overall diversity of the soil bacteria likewise showed a decreasing trend. High CaCO3 soils showed a positive correlation between Acidobacteria and macro-aggregates, and a negative correlation with clay and silt, when compared to low CaCO3 soils. Also, Chloroflexi and Gemmatimonadota showed the opposite relationship with SOC aggregates. CaCO3 influenced the relationship between SOC (fraction and chemical structure) and the bacterial community, resulting in changes in the SOC content within the aggregates. Our results indicate that CaCO3 plays an essential role in the accumulation of SOC and reveal the mechanisms of carbon sequestration in calcareous soils in northern China.
Carbon and Nitrogen Storage of a Restored Wetland at Illinois’ Emiquon Preserve: Potential for Carbon Sequestration

Hua Chen,Sarah Popovich,Amy McEuen,Benjamin Briddell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3218-z

IF: 2.822

2017-01-01

Hydrobiologia

Abstract:Conversion of wetlands to croplands results in the release of a significant amount of carbon (C) from soil organic matter (SOM) into the atmosphere. Restoring wetlands from croplands has C sequestration potential. The overall goal of our study was to quantify C and N storage of a restored wetland at the Emiquon Preserve, and examine its potential for C sequestration by comparing its C storage with C storage of reference natural wetlands in Illinois. Samples of plants and soils at the restored wetland and four reference wetland sites were collected in 2009 and 2011, respectively. We found that ecosystem storage of organic C (OC) and total N (TN) of the restored wetland was 38.29 Mg C ha−1 and 2.43 Mg N ha−1, respectively. For the reference sites, the average ecosystem storage of OC for sedge meadow and marsh was higher at 136.63 and 52.04 Mg C ha−1, respectively. The soil OC (SOC) storage of the restored wetland was only about 25% of SOC storage of reference sedge meadow sites and 46% of reference marsh site, suggesting that the restored wetland at Emiquon has the potential to sequester a large amount of additional C in the future.
Changes of Soil C Stocks and Stability after 70-Year Afforestation in the Northeast Usa

Faming Wang,Weixing Zhu,Hua Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2755-3

IF: 4.993

2015-01-01

Plant and Soil

Abstract:Forest restoration has been proposed as an effective strategy for the sequestration of atmosphere CO2. Understanding the mechanisms of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in afforestation is important to quantifying and enhancing carbon (C) sequestration.
Making soil carbon credits work for climate change mitigation

Elaine Mitchell,Naoya Takeda,Liam Grace,Peter Grace,Ken Day,Sahar Ahmadi,Warwick Badgery,Annette Cowie,Aaron Simmons,Richard Eckard,Matthew Tom Harrison,William Parton,Brian Wilson,Susan Orgill,Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel,David Pannell,Paige Stanley,Felicity Deane,David Rowlings

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2430780

2024-11-28

Carbon Management

Abstract:In 2023, the Australian Government issued ∼250,000 soil carbon credits following a measurement period characterised by high rainfall (Decile 10). The inferred soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates during this period, ranging from ∼2 to 8 t C ha − 1 yr − 1, significantly exceed rates reported in Australian scientific studies (∼0.1 to 1.2 t C ha − 1 yr − 1). Our analysis, incorporating SOC and biomass measurements alongside remote sensing of NDVI, reveals that these SOC gains were largely attributable to above-average rainfall rather than project interventions. Moreover, these gains were not sustained when rainfall returned to average levels, raising concerns about the durability of credited sequestration and its additionality beyond natural climatic variability. Our findings demonstrate that current safeguards within the Soil Carbon Method—such as withholding 25% of credits during the first measurement period—are likely insufficient to account for climatic variability. To strengthen the integrity of the carbon crediting system, we recommend extending the minimum measurement period for credit issuance to at least five years. Additionally, governments should establish science-based 'reasonable bounds' for expected long-term SOC gains from management practices to sense-check reported outcomes. These measures will ensure that credited SOC sequestration is more closely tied to management-driven outcomes rather than short-term climate-driven fluctuations.

environmental sciences,environmental studies
The importance of accounting method and sampling depth to estimate changes in soil carbon stocks

Anna M. Raffeld,Mark A. Bradford,Randall D. Jackson,Daniel Rath,Gregg R. Sanford,Nicole Tautges,Emily E. Oldfield

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-024-00249-1

IF: 4.3563

2024-01-27

Carbon Balance and Management

Abstract:As interest in the voluntary soil carbon market surges, carbon registries have been developing new soil carbon measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) protocols. These protocols are inconsistent in their approaches to measuring soil organic carbon (SOC). Two areas of concern include the type of SOC stock accounting method (fixed-depth (FD) vs. equivalent soil mass (ESM)) and sampling depth requirement. Despite evidence that fixed-depth measurements can result in error because of changes in soil bulk density and that sampling to 30 cm neglects a significant portion of the soil profile's SOC stock, most MRV protocols do not specify which sampling method to use and only require sampling to 30 cm. Using data from UC Davis's Century Experiment ("Century") and UW Madison's Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST), we quantify differences in SOC stock changes estimated by FD and ESM over 20 years, investigate how sampling at-depth (> 30 cm) affects SOC stock change estimates, and estimate how crediting outcomes taking an empirical sampling-only crediting approach differ when stocks are calculated using ESM or FD at different depths.

environmental sciences
Accounting for two-billion tons of stabilized soil carbon

C Wade Ross,Sabine Grunwald,Jason G Vogel,Daniel Markewitz,Eric J Jokela,Timothy A Martin,Rosvel Bracho,Allan R Bacon,Colby W Brungard,Xiong Xiong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134615

2020-02-10

Abstract:The pedosphere is the largest terrestrial reservoir of organic carbon, yet soil-carbon variability and its representation in Earth system models is a large source of uncertainty for carbon-cycle science and climate projections. Much of this uncertainty is attributed to local and regional-scale variability, and predicting this variation can be challenging if variable selection is based solely on a priori assumptions due to the scale-dependent nature of environmental determinants. Data mining can optimize predictive modeling by allowing machine-learning algorithms to learn from and discover complex patterns in large datasets that may have otherwise gone unnoticed, thus increasing the potential for knowledge discovery. In this analysis, we identify important, regional-scale determinants for top- and subsoil-carbon stabilization in production forestland across the southeastern US. Specifically, we apply recursive feature elimination to a large suite of socio-environmental data to strategically select a parsimonious, yet highly predictive covariate set. This is achieved by recursively considering smaller and smaller covariate sets-or features-by first training the estimator on the full set to obtain feature importance. The least important features are pruned, and the procedure is recursively repeated until a desired number of covariates is identified. We show that although carbon ranges from 0.3 to 8.2 kg m-2 in the topsoil (0 to 20 cm), and from 0.4 to 17.6 kg m-2 in the subsoil (20 to 100 cm), this variability is predictably distributed with precipitation, soil moisture, nitrogen and sand content, gamma ray emissions, mean annual minimum temperature, and elevation. From our spatial predictions, we estimate that 2.6 Pg of soil carbon is currently stabilized in the upper 100 cm of production forestland, which covers 34.7 million ha in the southeastern US.
Generate verifiable soil carbon credits from croplands

Peng Fu,David Schurman,Mitchell Donovan,James R. Kellner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03950-2

IF: 64.8

2023-12-12

Nature

Abstract:Letter to the Editor

multidisciplinary sciences
Enhancement of Carbon Sequestration in US Soils

WM Post,RC Izaurralde,JD Jastrow,BA McCarl,JE Amonette,VL Bailey,PM Jardine,TO West,JZ Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0895:eocsiu]2.0.co;2

2004-01-01

Abstract:Improved practices in agriculture, forestry, and land management could be used to increase soil carbon and thereby significantly reduce the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Understanding biological and edaphic processes that increase and retain soil carbon can lead to specific manipulations that enhance soil carbon sequestration. These manipulations, however, will be suitable for adoption only if they are technically feasible over large areas, economically competitive with alternative measures to offset greenhouse gas emissions, and environmentally beneficial. Here we present the elements of an integrated evaluation of soil carbon sequestration methods.
Agriculture models for restoring degraded land to enhance CO 2 biosequestration and carbon credits in the Vindhyan region of India

Ram Swaroop Meena,Gourisankar Pradhan,Kanchan Singh,Sandeep Kumar,Ambuj Kumar Singh,K.S. Shashidhar,Krishan Kant Mina,Ch. Srinivasa Rao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172661

IF: 9.8

2024-04-28

The Science of The Total Environment

Abstract:The study's objective was to evaluate the status of converted degraded land into productive agricultural models by improving the physicochemical properties of the soil, soil organic matter (SOM), soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions (active and passive), and microbial biomass carbon (MBC), while also generating carbon (C) credit for additional farmers' income. Six models were analyzed, namely: (1) Arjun forest-based agroecosystems (AFBAE); (2) Lemon grass-based agroecosystems (LGBAE); (3) Legume-cereal-moong-based agroecosystems (LCMBAE); (4) Bael-black mustard-based agroecosystems (BMBAE); (5) Guava-wheat-based agroecosystems (GWBAE), and (6) Custard apple -lentil -based agroecosystems (CALBAE). These models were replicated three times in a randomized block design (RBD). Soil samples were collected from the study area at two depths (0–0.30 and 0.30–0.60 m). At a 0–0.30 m depth, the highest bulk density ( ρb ) of 1.50 Mg m −3 was observed in LCMBAE, while the lowest ρb of 1.43 Mg m −3 was recorded in BMBAE. The soil organic carbon (SOC) and SOC stock values exhibited a range of 4.2–7.7 g kg −1 and 19.0–33.4 Mg ha −1 , respectively. In the AFBAE, the highest levels of 163.1 % MBC were found over LCMBAE. At a 0–0.30 m depth, the recalcitrant index (RI) and lability index (LI) ranged from 0.35–0.46 to 1.97–2.11, respectively. Additionally, the AFBAE exhibited the highest total biomass accumulation (39.23 Mg ha −1 ), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) biosequestration (287.9 Mg ha −1 ), and the total social cost of CO 2 at US$ 277 ha −1 . Furthermore, in the AFBAE, there was a 198.1 % increase in total C credit (US$ 161 ha −1 ) compared to LCMBAE (US$ 54 ha −1 ). However, at 0.30–0.60 m depths, GWBAE and CALBAE were statistically equivalent ( p ≤ 0.05) in total C stocks. Principal component analysis (PCA) reveals that component-1 accounts for 77.4 % of the variability, while component-2 contributes 18.6 %. This article aimed to convert the degraded land into a sustainable agricultural module by increasing SOC and CO 2 biosequestration and producing more C-credit, or climate currency, on underutilized land.

environmental sciences
Soil Carbon Sequestration: A Step towards Sustainability

Shilpa Kaushal,Nitish Sharma,Inderveer Singh,Harshveer Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i112957

2023-05-06

International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Abstract:Nowadays, sustainable agriculture is a major concern of the whole world, all leading agricultural countries like China, USA and India etc. are working together in several organizations such as FAO, World Food Organisation to overcome the problem of environmental health and food security in upcoming years to meet the food demand goal in 2050 in sustainable manner. Carbon present in soil naturally is termed as soil carbon which is directly related to organic matter present in soil, higher the soil carbon more will be the crop yield. Most of the soil carbon has been released in the atmosphere due to conversion of uncultivated land into cultivated agricultural land. Bringing back that released carbon back to the soil with several methods is known as soil carbon sequestration. In this paper, relation of soil carbon sequestration has been discussed with respect to organic farming, natural farming respectively. Changes carried out in traditional agronomical practices have potential in enhancement of soil carbon sequestration. Practices such as conservation tillage, growing cover crop, proper nutrient management, residue management etc. have significant capacity to sequester carbon in the soil, along with that various challenges which are being faced during carbon sequestration are also considered in this paper. Soil carbon sequestration is a temporary solution to Carbon dioxide enrichment, but it is challenging to operationalize due to obstacles such as measuring the soil's carbon stock, permanence, carbon pools, separation, and the soil's propensity to approach saturation levels. This chapter aims to raise knowledge of the capability of soils to absorb and store atmospheric carbon dioxide in long-lasting pools, reducing climate change.
Solutions and insights for agricultural monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) from three consecutive issuances of soil carbon credits

Charles D Brummitt,Cara A Mathers,Rebecca Arundale Keating,Katherine O'Leary,Mark Easter,Mark A Friedl,Max DuBuisson,Eleanor E Campbell,Ryan Pape,Samuel J W Peters,Ashok A Kumar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122284

2024-08-29

Abstract:Regenerative agricultural practice adoption on conventionally managed fields has gained momentum as a climate mitigation strategy, given the ability of these practices to sequester carbon or reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the geospatial and temporal variability of the impact of specific practices, such as cover cropping or no-till, pose challenges for scalable quantification of emissions reduction and deploying incentives to drive increased adoption. To quantify impact while accounting for variability and uncertainty at scale, Indigo Ag created a monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) pipeline to produce agricultural soil carbon credits produced at large scales (hundreds of thousands of hectares). The pipeline ingests field data from enrolled farmers, checks data quality, uses hybrid soil sampling and biogeochemical modeling to produce estimates of emissions reduction and uncertainty, and then applies deductions based on calculated uncertainty and leakage to quantify total project-wide carbon credits and monitor for durability of carbon. The implementation of a carbon project (CAR1459) from 2018 to 2022 on 553,743 ha of U.S. cropland utilizing the pipeline is estimated to have reduced emissions by 398,408.5 tCO2e, amounting to 296,662 tCO2e of soil carbon credits after uncertainty deductions. This paper explores the effect sizes associated with specific regenerative practice changes across the project domain. Cover cropping consistently resulted in a net positive climate impact and reduced emissions by 1.29 tCO2e per hectare per year, on average. Introduction of no-till was more common in the project, but it had a lower average emissions reduction of 0.38 tCO2e per hectare per year. Effect sizes for no-till vary spatiotemporally and are typically low in the first several years after adoption but increase in subsequent years. Agricultural carbon programs that capture and incentivize the nuance of outcomes of practices rather than the implementation of practices, can promote adoption of the right management practice to be deployed on the right field for maximum environmental benefit.
Enhancing Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration: A Review with Some Research Needs

Kaiyi Zhang,Zehao Liu,Bruce A. McCarl,Chengcheng J. Fei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12100151

2024-09-26

Climate

Abstract:The US rejoined the Paris Agreement in 2021 with a targeted 50–52% reduction in net GHG emissions in 2030 relative to 2005. Within the US's nationally determined contributions, several land-based mitigation options were submitted, targeting the removal of 0.4–1.3 GtCO2 yr−1 in 2030 compared to the net flux in 2010. Acknowledging disagreement has existed on both technological and economic feasibility levels of soil C sequestration adoption and practices, this review explores and evaluates the research findings and needs for six concepts: (1) permanence; (2) additionality; (3) leakage; (4) uncertainty; (5) transaction costs; and (6) heat-trapping ability of different gases. These concepts are crucial for the effective implementation of soil C sequestration projects since they help establish robust and integrated methodologies for measurement, verification, and issuance of carbon credits. In turn, they help ensure that environmental, social, and economic benefits are accurately assessed and credibly reported, enhancing the integrity of carbon markets and contributing to global climate mitigation efforts. This review also evaluates the existing and potential market opportunities for agricultural production with C sequestration and "climate- smart" farming practices. Current barriers to, research needs for, and policy considerations regarding soil C sequestration strategies are also stated.
Dynamic Stability of Soil Carbon: Reassessing the “Permanence” of Soil Carbon Sequestration

Katherine A. Dynarski,Deborah A. Bossio,Kate M. Scow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.514701

IF: 5.411

2020-11-13

Frontiers in Environmental Science

Abstract:Enhancing soil organic matter in agricultural soils has potential to contribute to climate mitigation while also promoting soil health and resilience. However, soil carbon (C) sequestration projects are rare in C markets. One concern surrounding soil C is uncertainty regarding the permanence of newly sequestered soil C. This scientific uncertainty is exacerbated by differences in terminology used by scientists and policymakers, which impedes the integration of new scientific findings regarding soil carbon longevity into evidence-based policies. Here, we review the evolution of understanding of soil C lifespan and the language used to describe it in both scientific and policy sectors. We find that recent scientific findings that have bearing on soil C lifespan are not part of discussions surrounding C policy, and conversely, policymaker concerns are not clearly addressed by scientific research. From a policy perspective, soil C is generally assumed to be a vulnerable pool at risk of being quickly lost via microbial degradation or other avenues of physical loss if soil C building practices are not maintained indefinitely. This assumption has been challenged by recent scientific advances demonstrating that microbial consumption and transformation of plant-derived C actually necessary for the long-term storage of soil organic matter. Here, we argue that soil C longevity can best be understood as resulting from continual movement and transformation of organic compounds throughout the soil matrix, and show that this definition is directly at odds with how soil C longevity is represented in current policies. Given current interest in new policies to promote soil C sequestration activities, resolving these definitions is critical. We further identify priority areas for future research in order to answer key policymaker questions about soil C lifespan, and to help develop new tools and benchmarks necessary to assess efficacy of agricultural soil C sequestration efforts.

environmental sciences
Including Land Management in a European Carbon Model with Lateral Transfer to the Oceans

Arthur N. Fendrich,Philippe Ciais,Panos Panagos,Philippe Martin,Marco Carozzi,Bertrand Guenet,Emanuele Lugato

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.118014

IF: 8.3

2024-01-01

Environmental Research

Abstract:The use of cover crops (CCs) is a promising cropland management practice with multiple benefits, notably in reducing soil erosion and increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. However, the current ability to represent these factors in land surface models remains limited to small scales or simplified and lumped approaches due to the lack of a sediment-carbon erosion displacement scheme. This precludes a thorough understanding of the consequences of introducing a CC into agricultural systems. In this work, this problem was addressed in two steps with the spatially distributed CE-DYNAM model. First, the historical effect of soil erosion, transport, and deposition on the soil carbon budget at a continental scale in Europe was characterized since the early industrial era, using reconstructed climate and land use forcings. Then, the impact of two distinct policy-oriented scenarios for the introduction of CCs were evaluated, covering the European cropping systems where surface erosion rates or nitrate susceptibility are critical. The evaluation focused on the increase in SOC storage and the export of particulate organic carbon (POC) to the oceans, compiling a continental-scale carbon budget. The results indicated that Europe exported 1.95 TgC/year of POC to the oceans in the last decade, and that CCs can contribute to reducing this amount while increasing SOC storage. Compared to the simulation without CCs, the additional rate of SOC storage induced by CCs peaked after 10 years of their adoption, followed by a decrease, and the cumulative POC export reduction stabilized after around 13 years. The findings indicate that the impacts of CCs on SOC and reduced POC export are persistent regardless of their spatial allocation adopted in the scenarios. Together, the results highlight the importance of taking the temporal aspect of CC adoption into account and indicate that CCs alone are not sufficient to meet the targets of the 4 parts per thousand initiative. Despite some known model limitations, which include the lack of feedback of erosion on the net primary productivity and the representation of carbon fluxes with an emulator, the current work constitutes the first approach to successfully couple a distributed routing scheme of eroded carbon to a land carbon model emulator at a reasonably high resolution and continental scale. Short abstract: A spatially distributed model coupling erosion, transport, and deposition to the carbon cycle was developed. Then, it was used to simulate the impact of cover crops on both erosion and carbon, to show that cover crops can simultaneously increase organic carbon storage and reduce particulate organic carbon export to the oceans. The results seemed persistent regardless of the spatial distribution of cover crops.
Understanding the role of soil erosion on co2-c loss using (13)c isotopic signatures in abandoned Mediterranean agricultural land

Agata Novara,Saskia Keesstra,Artemio Cerdà,Paulo Pereira,Luciano Gristina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.095

2016-04-15

Abstract:Understanding soil water erosion processes is essential to evaluate the redistribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) within a landscape and is fundamental to assess the role of soil erosion in the global carbon (C) budget. The main aim of this study was to estimate the C redistribution and losses using (13)C natural abundance. Carbon losses in soil sediment, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and CO2 emission were determined. Four bounded parallel plots were installed on a 10% slope. In the upper part of the plots, C3soil was replaced with C4soil. The SOC and δ(13)C were measured after 145.2mm rainfall in the upper (2m far from C4strip), middle (4m far from C4strip) lower (6m far from C4strip) trams of the plot and in the sediments collected in the Gerlach collector at the lower part of the plot. A laboratory incubation experiment was performed to evaluate the CO2 emission rate of soils in each area. OC was mainly lost in the sediments as 2.08g(-)(2) of C was lost after 145.2mm rainfall. DOC losses were only 5.61% of off-site OC loss. Three months after the beginning of the experiment, 15.90% of SOC in the upper tram of the plot had a C4 origin. The C4-SOC content decreased along the 6m length of the plot, and in the sediments collected by the Gerlach collector. CO2 emission rate was high in the upper plot tram due to the high SOC content. The discrimination of CO2 in C3 and C4 portion permitted to increase our level of understanding on the stability of SOC and its resilience to decomposition. The transport of sediments along the plot increased SOC mineralization by 43%. Our study underlined the impact of rainfall in C losses in soil and water in abandoned Mediterranean agriculture fields and the consequent implications on the C balance.
How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal

Pete Smith,Jean‐Francois Soussana,Denis Angers,Louis Schipper,Claire Chenu,Daniel P. Rasse,Niels H. Batjes,Fenny Egmond,Stephen McNeill,Matthias Kuhnert,Cristina Arias‐Navarro,Jorgen E. Olesen,Ngonidzashe Chirinda,Dario Fornara,Eva Wollenberg,Jorge Álvaro‐Fuentes,Alberto Sanz‐Cobena,Katja Klumpp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14815

IF: 11.6

2019-10-06

Global Change Biology

Abstract:<p>There is growing international interest in better managing soils to increase soil organic carbon content to contribute to climate change mitigation, to enhance resilience to climate change and to underpin food security, through initiatives such as international "4p1000″ initiative and the FAO's Global assessment of soil organic carbon sequestration potential (GSOCseq) programme. Since soil organic carbon content of soils cannot be easily measured, a key barrier to implementing programmes to increase soil organic carbon at large scale, is the need for credible and reliable measurement/monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) platforms, both for national reporting and for emissions trading. Without such platforms, investments could be considered risky.</p><p>In this paper we review methods and challenges of measuring SOC change directly in soils, before examining some recent novel developments that show promise for quantifying SOC. We describe how repeat soil surveys are used to estimate changes in SOC over time, and how long‐term experiments and space‐for‐time‐substitution sites can serve as sources of knowledge and can be used to test models, and as potential benchmark sites in global frameworks to estimate SOC change. We briefly consider models that can be used to simulate and project change in SOC and examine the MRV platforms for soil organic carbon change already in use in various countries / regions. In the final section, we bring together the various components described in this review, to describe a new vision for a global framework for MRV of soil organic carbon change, to support national and international initiatives seeking to effect change in the way we manage our soils.</p>

environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
Regionally Diverse Land-Use Driven Feedbacks from Soils to the Climate System

Hermann F. Jungkunst,Thomas Horvath,Stefan Erasmi,Jan Paul Krüger,Katharina H.M. Meurer,Klaus Schützenmeister,Thomas Guillaume,Thomas Scholten,Frank Baumann,Per-Marten Schleuss,Jin-Sheng He,Peter Kühn,Jessica Henkner,Jens Boy,Thomas Kätterer,Julia Schneider

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b21225-3

2018-01-01

Abstract:When one looks at the global distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, a few patterns emerge (Figure 3.1). The SOC density is not uniformly distributed and nitrogen (N) is strongly associated with it. Hot spots of SOC density exist primarily in the northern higher latitudes and again in smaller pockets in the equatorial regions. But even this general pattern has numerous important exceptions. In the northern hemisphere, for example, regional hot spots exist in central China, in the southwestern forests of the US and in the Pacific Northwest of North America. At the same time in the southern hemisphere, the forests of New Zealand and the Patagonian region in Chile have high SOC densities. One could argue alone from this heterogeneous distribution that processes affecting SOC and N need to be treated on a more regional than global scale. In addition to the carbon (C) stocks, the main factors expected to alter soil C processes in the future are also predicted to change regionally. As an example, when one combines the distribution of C stocks with predicted changes in temperature and precipitation, the overlap can be modeled to show regional hot (red) and cold (green) spots of C release from soils (Figure 3.2). The rcp45 scenario indicates that major changes to soil C processes will occur not only in the tundra, but also significant changes may occur throughout the tropics. Changes in the far northern latitudes will likely create regional sources of CO2 to the atmosphere, whereas in the tropical regions, changes will create sink conditions resulting in CO2 uptake. It also points out some interesting regional hot spots, some of which are considered in regional case studies in this chapter (e.g., Russia, Tibet, Sweden, and Brazil). On the other hand, some regions emerge as areas lacking previous regional consideration, which may indicate the need for future research (e.g., southeastern US, the Balkan states, and Central America). Thus, the objective of this chapter is to focus on the advantages of a regional approach to understand future changes in soil C processes.
Accounting for soil carbon changes in agricultural life cycle assessment (LCA): a review

Pietro Goglio,Ward N. Smith,Brian B. Grant,Raymond L. Desjardins,Brian G. McConkey,Con A. Campbell,Thomas Nemecek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.040

IF: 11.1

2015-10-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:Soil carbon sequestration, a climate change mitigation option for agriculture, can either increase or decrease as a result of land management change (LMC) and land use change (LUC). To estimate all greenhouse gas (GHG) exchanges associated with various agricultural systems, life cycle assessments (LCAs) are frequently undertaken. To date LCA practitioners have not had a well-defined procedure to account for soil C in their assessments and as a consequence it is often not included. In this study, various methods used to estimate soil C changes due to (i) LMC and (ii) LUC are examined to assess soil C accounting methodologies in the life cycle inventory (LCI) of agricultural LCAs. A compromise between accuracy and completeness in LCA methods is necessary. A ranking of the preference of soil C accounting methods is suggested based on user expertise and data quality. For large scale assessment, the timing of soil CO2 emissions should be taken into account. If indirect LUC is relevant, a sensitivity analysis of assessment methods should be conducted because the methods highly affect assessment results. A common soil C accounting method that can be easily applied in agricultural LCA needs to be established and an agreement on indirect LUC methods will facilitate the assessment of LMC and LUC within agricultural LCAs.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
The interplay between external residue addition, and soil organic carbon dynamics and mineralization kinetics: Experiences from a 12-year old conservation agriculture

Priyanka Saha,T.K. Das,Suman Sen,Prabhu Govindasamy,Raj Singh,Rishi Raj,Dibakar Mahanta,M.C. Meena,Arti Bhatia,Livleen Shukla,Abir Dey,Bappa Paramanik,Arkaprava Roy,Alekhya Gunturi,Tarun Sharma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122998

IF: 8.7

2024-11-01

Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract:Maintaining soil carbon is vital under changing climate. Conservation agriculture (CA) is reported to have potential to store soil organic carbon (SOC). The impact of carbon inputs on SOC dynamics and mineralization kinetics, and the priming effect of residue addition under long-term CA in subtropical regions, however, are not clear or adequately evaluated. Therefore, we studied these under a 12-year-old CA-based pigeon pea-wheat cropping system with permanent broad bed with residue (CA-PBB), permanent flatbed with residue (CA-PFB), permanent narrow bed with residue (CA-PNB), and conventional till (CT) treatments. Also, an incubation study was undertaken to understand better the processes involved. Results showed that CA treatments significantly enhanced the total SOC compared to CT practice, and, among them, the CA-PFB exhibited highest total SOC with 36.6% and 35.8% higher values at 0–5 and 5–15 cm depths, respectively. The CA-PFB followed by CA-PBB and CA-PNB had significantly higher carbon management index and carbon retention efficiency than CT. The CA-PFB also showed higher carbon sequestration rates of 68.4 and 188.8 kg ha −1 year −1 , surpassing values of 8.4 and 52.9 kg ha −1 year −1 under CT at 0–5 and 5–15 cm depth, respectively. Furthermore, soil incubation study revealed that the CA systems had higher cumulative mineralization values at 0–5 cm soil layer but lower at 5–15 cm soil compared to CT, indicating a considerable improvement in SOC at 5–15 cm soil depth. On the contrary, the SOC decay rate was higher under CA than CT, and at 35 °C than at 15 °C. A positive priming effect was also observed, depending on the substrate type, pigeon pea residue exhibiting higher priming effect than wheat residue. Thus, these studies show that residue input increases cumulative mineralization and SOC decay rate vis-à-vis helps to sequester carbon in the recalcitrant fraction, leading to higher stable carbon in soil.

environmental sciences
Monitoring Carbon Stock Changes in European Soils: Process Understanding and Sampling Strategies

Marion Schrumpf,Jens Schumacher,Ingo Schöning,Ernst-Detlef Schulze

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76570-9_9

2008-01-01

Abstract:Soils are the main reservoir for carbon (C) in terrestrial ecosystems. On a global average, they contain about 2–3 times as much organic carbon (OC) as the atmosphere or standing biomass, namely about 1500–2000Gt (Janzen 2005).It is well established that this reservoir is not inert, but in a dynamic stage of accumulation or decomposition. These processes are influenced by human activities. A major anthropogenic disturbance of soils is a land-use change from forest or natural grassland to agricultural soils (Johnson and Curtis 2001; Guo and Gifford 2002), and the permanent mechanical disturbance by ploughing. Prairie soils, for instance, lost 50% of their original soil C after 50 years of cultivation, and at a rate of about 70 g m−2 y−2 (Matson et al. 1997). The remaining 50% are temporary stabilized against decomposition by various mechanisms (Gleixner et al. 2001), but also this C can be mobilized under changing conditions, although at a much slower rate. Apparently, there is no organic matter in soils which is totally protected against microbial attack. But accumulation or degradation of soil C are influenced by environmental conditions and management.Thus, the following section will discuss (1) the processes that lead to C stabilization or mobilization, (2) approaches of soil C assessment, (3) existing approaches for the determination of soil C changes and (4) optimization strategies for soil sampling at the European scale.

Crediting agricultural soil carbon sequestration

Calcium Carbonate Regulates Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation by Mediating Microbial Communities in Northern China

Carbon and Nitrogen Storage of a Restored Wetland at Illinois’ Emiquon Preserve: Potential for Carbon Sequestration

Changes of Soil C Stocks and Stability after 70-Year Afforestation in the Northeast Usa

Making soil carbon credits work for climate change mitigation

The importance of accounting method and sampling depth to estimate changes in soil carbon stocks

Accounting for two-billion tons of stabilized soil carbon

Generate verifiable soil carbon credits from croplands

Enhancement of Carbon Sequestration in US Soils

Agriculture models for restoring degraded land to enhance CO 2 biosequestration and carbon credits in the Vindhyan region of India

Soil Carbon Sequestration: A Step towards Sustainability

Solutions and insights for agricultural monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) from three consecutive issuances of soil carbon credits

Enhancing Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration: A Review with Some Research Needs

Dynamic Stability of Soil Carbon: Reassessing the “Permanence” of Soil Carbon Sequestration

Including Land Management in a European Carbon Model with Lateral Transfer to the Oceans

Understanding the role of soil erosion on co2-c loss using (13)c isotopic signatures in abandoned Mediterranean agricultural land

How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal

Regionally Diverse Land-Use Driven Feedbacks from Soils to the Climate System

Accounting for soil carbon changes in agricultural life cycle assessment (LCA): a review

The interplay between external residue addition, and soil organic carbon dynamics and mineralization kinetics: Experiences from a 12-year old conservation agriculture

Monitoring Carbon Stock Changes in European Soils: Process Understanding and Sampling Strategies