The importance of accounting method and sampling depth to estimate changes in soil carbon stocks

Anna M. Raffeld,Mark A. Bradford,Randall D. Jackson,Daniel Rath,Gregg R. Sanford,Nicole Tautges,Emily E. Oldfield
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-024-00249-1
IF: 4.3563
2024-01-27
Carbon Balance and Management
Abstract:As interest in the voluntary soil carbon market surges, carbon registries have been developing new soil carbon measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) protocols. These protocols are inconsistent in their approaches to measuring soil organic carbon (SOC). Two areas of concern include the type of SOC stock accounting method (fixed-depth (FD) vs. equivalent soil mass (ESM)) and sampling depth requirement. Despite evidence that fixed-depth measurements can result in error because of changes in soil bulk density and that sampling to 30 cm neglects a significant portion of the soil profile's SOC stock, most MRV protocols do not specify which sampling method to use and only require sampling to 30 cm. Using data from UC Davis's Century Experiment ("Century") and UW Madison's Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST), we quantify differences in SOC stock changes estimated by FD and ESM over 20 years, investigate how sampling at-depth (> 30 cm) affects SOC stock change estimates, and estimate how crediting outcomes taking an empirical sampling-only crediting approach differ when stocks are calculated using ESM or FD at different depths.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?