Seismic Reflection: Upstream, Downstream, and on Earthen Dams and Dikes
Richard D. Miller,Richard D. Markiewicz,Lisa V. Block,Steve Hartung,William E. Hancock,Julian Ivanov,Jianghai Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2924748
2007-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2007Seismic Reflection: Upstream, Downstream, and on Earthen Dams and DikesAuthors: Richard D. MillerRichard D. MarkiewiczLisa BlockSteve HartungWilliam E. HancockJulian IvanovJianghai XiaRichard D. MillerKansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KSSearch for more papers by this author, Richard D. MarkiewiczU.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, COSearch for more papers by this author, Lisa BlockU.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, COSearch for more papers by this author, Steve HartungU.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock, ARSearch for more papers by this author, William E. HancockU.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle, WASearch for more papers by this author, Julian IvanovKansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KSSearch for more papers by this author, and Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KSSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.4133/1.2924748 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract High‐resolution seismic reflection has been used successfully to characterize material and investigate a variety of problems associated with earthen dams and abutments. Limitations and challenges of seismic reflection when interrogating these structures and lithologies are nontrivial and require very critical thinking. Seismic reflection has proved an effective tool for mapping confining units for integration into the cutoff wall at the Keechelus Dam in Cle Elum, Washington; mapping lithologies and bedrock structures for earthquake retrofitting at Bend, Oregon; delineating karst in bedrock beneath the dam core responsible for subsidence on the upstream side of a major flood control structure at Clearwater Dam, Missouri; and detecting high permeability zones within a glacial outwash embankment of a water retention dam near Enumclaw, Washington. Extreme geometries and material variability associated with any man‐made structure are the most formidable challenge to seismically imaging. Inconsistent source wavelets, out‐of‐the‐plane energy, extreme statics (topography and velocity based), and source noise (disproportionately high percentage of surface waves) are all problems that are not unique to earthen dams, dikes, and levees, but they are certainly more prevalent with those types of structures. Success of the technique in these settings is source characteristics and spatial oversampling.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2924748FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByHardware for a Wireless Geophysical Monitoring Testbed Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2007ISSN (online):1554-8015Copyright: 2007 Pages: 1557 publication data© 2007 Copyright © 2007 The Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished: 30 Sep 2008 CITATION INFORMATION Richard D. Miller, Richard D. Markiewicz, Lisa Block, Steve Hartung, William E. Hancock, Julian Ivanov, and Jianghai Xia, (2007), "Seismic Reflection: Upstream, Downstream, and on Earthen Dams and Dikes," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : 861-870. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2924748 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...