Abstract:Research on attentional control has largely focused on single senses and the importance of behavioural goals in controlling attention. However, everyday situations are multisensory and contain regularities, both likely influencing attention. We investigated how visual attentional capture is simultaneously impacted by top-down goals, the multisensory nature of stimuli, and the contextual factors of stimuli's semantic relationship and temporal predictability. Participants performed a multisensory version of the Folk et al. (1992) spatial cueing paradigm, searching for a target of a predefined colour (e.g. a red bar) within an array preceded by a distractor. We manipulated: 1) stimuli's goal-relevance via distractor's colour (matching vs. mismatching the target), 2) stimuli's multisensory nature (colour distractors appearing alone vs. with tones), 3) the relationship between the distractor sound and colour (arbitrary vs. semantically congruent) and 4) the temporal predictability of distractor onset. Reaction-time spatial cueing served as a behavioural measure of attentional selection. We also recorded 129-channel event-related potentials (ERPs), analysing the distractor-elicited N2pc component both canonically and using a multivariate electrical neuroimaging framework. Behaviourally, arbitrary target-matching distractors captured attention more strongly than semantically congruent ones, with no evidence for context modulating multisensory enhancements of capture. Notably, electrical neuroimaging of surface-level EEG analyses revealed context-based influences on attention to both visual and multisensory distractors, in how strongly they activated the brain and type of activated brain networks. For both processes, the context-driven brain response modulations occurred long before the N2pc time-window, with topographic (network-based) modulations at ∼30 ms, followed by strength-based modulations at ∼100 ms post-distractor onset. Our results reveal that both stimulus meaning and predictability modulate attentional selection, and they interact while doing so. Meaning, in addition to temporal predictability, is thus a second source of contextual information facilitating goal-directed behaviour. More broadly, in everyday situations, attention is controlled by an interplay between one's goals, stimuli's perceptual salience, meaning and predictability. Our study calls for a revision of attentional control theories to account for the role of contextual and multisensory control.

Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate

Attentional Capture and Control

Attentional capture: An ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets

The Effect of Working Memory Load on Attentional Capture

Rapid Disengagement Hypothesis and Signal Suppression Hypothesis of Visual Attentional Capture

Evidence against the low-salience account of attentional suppression.

Attentional Capture is Contingent on the Interaction Between Task Demand and Stimulus Salience

Salience effects on attentional selection are enabled by task relevance.

Secondary capture: Salience information persistently drives attentional selection.

An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors

Salient distractor processing: inhibition following attentional capture

Towards understanding how we pay attention in naturalistic visual search settings

Salience Determines Attentional Orienting in Visual Selection.

The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.

First encounters: Estimating the initial magnitude of attentional capture

Neural evidence for attentional capture by salient distractors

Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

Consensus emerges and biased competition wins: A commentary on Luck et al. (2021)

Control over attentional capture within 170 ms by long-term memory control settings: Evidence from the N2pc

Spatial Attention, Feature-Based Attention, and Saccades: Three Sides of One Coin?

Attentional suppression of dynamic versus static salient distractors