Abstract:Attentional capture by an irrelevant salient distractor is attenuated when the distractor is presented more frequently in one location compared to other locations, suggesting that people learn to suppress an irrelevant salient location. However, to date it is unclear whether this suppression is proactive, applied before attention has been directed to the distractor location, or reactive, occurring after attention has been directed to that specific location. The aim of the present study is to investigate how suppression is accomplished by using the pinging technique which allows one to probe how attention is distributed across the visual field prior to the presentation of the search display. In an EEG experiment, participants performed a visual search task wherein they were tasked with identifying a shape singleton in the presence of an irrelevant color singleton. Compared to all other locations, this color singleton appeared more frequently at a specific location, which was termed the high-probability location. Prior to the search task, we introduced a continuous recall spatial memory task to reveal the hidden attentional priority map. Participants had to memorize the location of a memory cue continuously and report this location after the visual search task. Critically, after the presentation of the memory cue but before the onset of the search display, a neutral placeholder display was presented to probe how hidden priority map is reconfigured by the learned distractor suppression. Behaviorally, there was clear evidence that the high-probability location was suppressed, as search was more efficient when the distractor appeared at this location. To examine the priority map prior to search, we adopted an inverted encoding approach to reconstruct the tuning profile of the memorized position in the spatial memory task. Inverted modeling resulted in reliable tuning profiles during memory maintenance that gradually decayed and that were revived again by the onset of a neutral placeholder display preceding search. After the onset of the placeholders, the tuning profile observed was characterized by a spatial gradient centered over the high-probability location, with tuning being most pronounced at the-to-be suppressed location. This finding suggests that while learned suppression is initiated prior to search display onset, it is preceded by an initial phase of spatial selection, which is in line with a reactive suppression account. Together these results further our understanding of the mechanism of spatial distractor suppression.

Attentional capture: An ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets

The Effect of Working Memory Load on Attentional Capture

Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate

Secondary capture: Salience information persistently drives attentional selection.

Attentional Capture is Contingent on the Interaction Between Task Demand and Stimulus Salience

Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture Independent of Search Strategy

Salience effects on attentional selection are enabled by task relevance.

The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.

Salience Determines Attentional Orienting in Visual Selection.

Rapid Disengagement Hypothesis and Signal Suppression Hypothesis of Visual Attentional Capture

Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli

Attentional Capture and Control

Evidence against the low-salience account of attentional suppression.

Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

Pinging the Hidden Attentional Priority Map: Suppression Needs Attention

Relative saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of color and face singleton distractors: evidence from event-related potential studies

First encounters: Estimating the initial magnitude of attentional capture

Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.

Reward Captures Attention Independent of the Current Focus of Attention

Neural evidence for attentional capture by salient distractors

An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors