Abstract:The social significance and quality of scientific research largely depend on the usefulness of research results for the social and scientific community. The lack of funds and the desire to allocate funding to high-quality research projects make the assessment of the quality of research and the valorization of knowledge increasingly important. However, it is very difficult to apply criteria that can objectively assess scientific research, providing precise qualitative and quantitative data on which funding agencies could base their decisions. The product of scientific research is mainly information published in scientific journals. They are the basis for the dissemination of knowledge and the basic criteria for academic and scientific evaluation, fundraising for scientific research and career advancement. In addition to the evaluation of scientific publications, there is a wide range of other activities that reflect the scientific credibility of scientists, such as: number and quality of grants for scientific research projects, leadership in national or international academic societies, membership in editorial boards of reputable journals, doctoral dissertation mentorships and the like. Although these activities are important and give credibility to the scientist, the relevant scientometric systems cover only publications, neglecting other criteria of scientific importance in evaluation for purpose of academic advancement of a scientist, as well as competitions for grants for financial support of scientific research. The reason for this is the fact that these activities, regardless of their importance, are very heterogeneous, with specific characteristics, and require very diverse parameters for evaluation. Therefore, there are no universal evaluation criteria for these activities and their quality is generally assessed individually, depending on the purpose of the assessment. Regardless of the shortcomings, university ranking systems are important comparative parameters for assessing the quality of scientific and educational value of universities.

Scientometrics as a Limiting Factor of Economic Researches: the Evidence From the USA

A scientists' view of scientometrics: Not everything that counts can be counted

Publish or Patent: Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies

Influence of development of scientometrics on the outlook and functioning of the science system in the world and in individual countries

Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline

The narrowing of literature use and the restricted mobility of papers in the sciences

Uncited articles and their effect on the concentration of citations

Measuring science: irresistible temptations, easy shortcuts and dangerous consequences

Predicting the impact of American Economic Review articles by author characteristics

Scientometrics and communication theory: Towards theoretically informed indicators

Scientometric assessment of funded scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2011–2021)

Growth of Science: How long will the United States uphold its position?

Scientometric engineering: Exploring citation dynamics via arXiv eprints

Evolution of the Development of Scientometrics

Has Price's Dream Come True: is Scientometrics a Hard Science?

Distinct citation distributions complicate research evaluations. A single indicator that universally reveals research efficiency cannot be formulated

On the “scientometric Decline” of British Science. One Additional Graph in Reply to Ben Martin

Macro-level Indicators of the Relations between Research Funding and Research Output

Academic reputations of Russian economists and their scientometric estimates

The Scientometric Overview of the Economics Disciplines Publications in Kazakhstan in 1997-2022

The Sci-Hub effect on papers’ citations