Abstract:Relevance. The relevance of the study is justified by the demand to identify personal determinants of individual perception of extreme manifestations in order to improve the efficiency of response. The objective is to establish the determining parameters based on a set of psychological characteristics, reflecting the subject’s mental positioning in the security setting of what they consider major extreme phenomena. Methods. The respondents included 112 students aged 19 to 21 years studying in Moscow and regional universities. Research methods included associative experiment, individual scaling, and HEXACO-PI-R-60 questionnaire testing. Empirical data was processed by calculation of mean values, percentage distribution, ranking, as well as methods of correlation, factor and regression analysis, and the Pearson’s chi-squared test. Results and analysis. From the individual perspective, extreme scenarios are associated with specific phenomena that differ in stereotyping and objectivity (danger, threat, risk/riskiness, complexity, fear, strangeness, extreme, catastrophe, extreme, horror/ awful, threshold, implausibility, maximalism / maximality, ingenuity, extraordinary, murder, excessive demand, fire, flood, cold, accident, snowfall, heat). Considering the differences in the assessments on danger/safety scale, the structure of extreme phenomena includes such components as “catastrophe”, “emergency”, “threat”, and “risk”. The respondents’ mind positions the structural components of extreme scenarios by the degree of danger/safety, thus producing the following sequence: disaster – threat – emergency – risk, ranging them from “highly dangerous and unsafe” to “safe”. Individual characteristics of high reliability level contribute differently to individual assessment of the structural components constituting extreme phenomena in terms of the degree of danger/safety. Regression models were used to analyze the students’ danger/safety assessment of the structural components based on particular personality traits. The result showed that emotions, awareness, and preparedness to acquire experience contributed most significantly to the assessment of extreme phenomena in terms of danger/safety. Conclusion. It is well known, that emotions play a key role in an individual’s ability to assess the level of danger/safety with regard to various extreme phenomena. This evidence makes it a critical imperative to develop individual emotional self-regulation abilities. In particular, nurturing the necessary ability in the promising representatives of extreme professions requires specific focus.

Politics, Personality, and Impulsivity Can Color People’s Perceptions of—and Responses to—Hurricane Threats of Varying Severity

Personality and Network Factors: Impact of Predispositions and Network Heterogenity on Civic Participation

The Role of Personality in COVID-19-Related Perceptions, Evaluations, and Behaviors: Findings Across Five Samples, Nine Traits, and 17 Criteria

Hope, optimism, and self-efficacy predicting mental health and illness in a community sample exposed to Hurricane Harvey

Testing Theories of Threat, Individual Difference, and Ideology: Little Evidence of Personality-Based Individual Differences in Ideological Responses to Threat

Personal determinants of extreme phenomena mental positioning

The influence of certainty and probability on emotional and behavioral reactions within weather anxiety

Impulsive Responses to Positive and Negative Emotions: Parallel Neurocognitive Correlates and Their Implications

Evacuate or social distance? Modeling the influence of threat perceptions on hurricane evacuation in a dual-threat environment

A Cognitive‐Affective Scale for Hurricane Risk Perception

Threat Sensitivity in Emotion Dynamics: Negativity Effects and Sex Differences

The unique roles of threat perception and misinformation accuracy judgments in the relationship between political orientation and COVID‐19 health behaviors

Fear, anger, and risk.

Mitigating Risk? Set-Shifting Ability in High Threat Sensitive Individuals Predicts Approach Behavior During Simulated Peer-Rejection

Why near-miss events can decrease an individual's protective response to hurricanes

Drivers of natural disaster risk‐reduction actions and their temporal dynamics: Insights from surveys during an imminent hurricane threat and its aftermath

Personal relevance affects the perceived immorality of politically-charged threats

Emotions, worry, efficacy, and climate change–related sustainability behaviors among a representative sample of Texas and Florida residents

The Cognitive and Perceptual Correlates of Ideological Attitudes: a Data-Driven Approach.

Intolerance of Uncertainty and Neuroticism: Transdiagnostic Vulnerabilities and War-Related Safety Preparatory Behavior

Fair-Weather Voters: Personality and Vote Switching Intentions