Abstract:Background: Articular cartilage injury is frequently encountered, yet treatment options capable of providing durable cartilage repair are limited. Purpose: To investigate the medium-term clinical outcomes of cartilage repair using a 1-stage technique of a hyaluronic acid–based scaffold with activated bone marrow aspirate concentrate (HA-BMAC) and compare results with those of microfracture. A secondary aim of this study was to identify specific patient demographic factors and cartilage lesion characteristics that are associated with superior outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Fifty physically active patients (mean age, 45 years) with grade IV cartilage injury of the knee (lesion size, 1.5-24 cm 2 ) were treated with HA-BMAC or microfracture and were observed prospectively for 5 years. Patients were placed into the HA-BMAC group if the health insurance policy of the treating institution supported this option; otherwise, they were placed into the microfracture group. Objective and subjective clinical assessment tools were used preoperatively and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively to compare treatment outcomes. Results: Significant improvements in outcome scores were achieved in both treatment groups at 2 years ( P < .001). In the microfracture group, 64% were classified as normal or nearly normal according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective score at 2 years, compared with 100% of those treated with HA-BMAC ( P < .001). Normal or nearly normal objective assessments in the microfracture group declined significantly after 5 years to 28% of patients ( P = .004). All patients treated with HA-BMAC maintained improvement at 5 years according to Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC objective, and IKDC subjective scores. Tegner, IKDC objective, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) assessments demonstrated higher scores in the HA-BMAC treatment group compared with microfracture at 5 years. Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores were similar between treatment groups at 5 years. Poorer outcomes in the microfracture group were demonstrated in cases of lesions larger than 4 cm 2 and nonsolitary lesions. Age greater than 45 years, large size of lesion, and treatment of multiple lesions were not associated with poorer outcome in patients treated with HA-BMAC. Conclusion: Repair of chondral injury using a hyaluronic acid–based scaffold with activated bone marrow aspirate concentrate provides better clinical outcomes and more durable cartilage repair at medium-term follow-up compared with microfracture. Positive short-term clinical outcomes can be achieved with either microfracture or HA-BMAC. Cartilage repair using HA-BMAC leads to successful medium-term outcomes independent of age or lesion size.

Microfracture Arthroscopy Efficacy In Treatment Of Articular Cartilage Insult Of Knee

Arthroscopic Microfrature for Articular Cartilage Damage of the Knee

An Investigation on the Clinical Outcome of Full-thickness Knee Articular Chondral Defects Repaired by Arthroscopic Microfracture Technique

Clinical efficacy of treating knee osteoarthritis by microfracture under arthroscopy

Microfracture for cartilage repair in the knee: a systematic review of the contemporary literature

Current advances on surgical treatment for knee articular cartilage injuries

Clinical Evaluation of Arthroscopic Microfracture Technique for Treatment of Articular Cartilage Lesions in Knee

High-impact athletics after knee articular cartilage repair: a prospective evaluation of the microfracture technique

Comparison of the Relativity of MRI Appearance of Cartilage Injuries and Postoperative Effect of Arthroscope on Articular Cartilage Disease of Knee

Microfracture for the Treatment of Symptomatic Cartilage Lesions of the Knee: A Survey of International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society

The Relationship Between Cartilage Injury Degree Confirmed by MRI and Postoperative Effect of Arthroscope in Knee Osteoarthritis

Microfracture for Acetabular Chondral Defects in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement

Particulated Costal Allocartilage With Microfracture Versus Microfracture Alone for Knee Cartilage Defects: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Participant- and Rater-Blinded Study

Observation on clinical treatment outcome of full-thickness chondral defects of knee by arthroscopic microfracture

The use of arthroscopy in diagnosing and treating sports-related cartilage lesions

Focal articular cartilage defects of the knee: surgical treatment

Arthroscopic Drilling Vs. Micro-Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Full-Thickness Chondral Defects

Comparative Efficacy of Osteochondral Autologous Transplantation and Microfracture in the Knee: an Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Treatment of Chronic Chondral Injuries

Microfracture for medium size to large knee chondral defects has limited long-term efficacy: A systematic review

One-Stage Cartilage Repair Using a Hyaluronic Acid–Based Scaffold With Activated Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Compared With Microfracture