Abstract:<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Information disclosure is a top priority for official responses to the 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The information published by the authorities as a response to the crisis has been a cause of great concern to the public; however, there is limited evidence of any systematic analyses of the disclosed epidemic information. This in turn has important implications for risk communication. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to describe and compare the officially released content regarding the local epidemic situations and analyze the characteristics of information disclosure through local transmission for both the individual and total population levels in major cities of China. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> The 31 capital cities in mainland China were enrolled in a city-level observational study. Data were retrieved from local municipalities and health commission websites as of March 18, 2020. A checklist was employed as a rapid qualitative assessment tool to analyze the information disclosure performance of each city. Descriptive analyses and data visualizations were produced to present and compare the comparative performances of the cities. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> In total, 29 cities (93.5%) established specific COVID-19 webpages to disclose information. Among them, 12 of the city webpages were added to their corresponding municipal websites. A majority of the cities (21 of 31, 67.7%) published their first cases of infection in a timely manner on the actual day of confirmation. Regarding the information disclosures highlighted on the websites, news updates from local media or press briefings were the most prevalent (28 of 29, 96.6%), followed by epidemic surveillance (25 of 29, 86.2%) and advice for the public (25 of 29, 86.2%). Clarifications of misinformation and frequently asked questions were largely overlooked as only 2 cities provided this valuable information. The median daily update frequency of epidemic surveillance summaries was 1.2 times per day (interquartile range 1.0 to 1.3 times), and the majority of these summaries (18 of 25, 72.0%) also provided detailed information of confirmed cases. The reporting of key indicators in the epidemic surveillance summaries, as well as critical facts included in the confirmed case reports, varied substantially between cities. In general, the best performance in terms of timely reporting and the transparency of information disclosures were observed in the municipalities directly administered by the central government compared to the other cities. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Timely and effective efforts to disclose information related to the COVID-19 epidemic have been made in major cities of China. Continued improvements to local authority reporting will contribute to more effective public communication and efficient public health research responses. The development of protocols and the standardization of epidemic message templates—as well as the use of uniform operating procedures to provide regular information updates—should be prioritized to ensure a coordinated national response. </sec>

Changes in the Scientific Information Environment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Importance of Scientific Situational Awareness in Responding to the Infodemic

Enhancing global health communication during a crisis: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Infodemic: Challenges and Solutions in Topic Discovery and Data Process.

Infodemics: A new challenge for public health

Research on emergency management of global public health emergencies driven by digital technology: A bibliometric analysis

Enlightenment from the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Environmental Factors in Future Public Health Emergency Response

Public understanding of science: Communicating in the midst of a pandemic

Information disclosure during the COVID-19 epidemic in China: A city-level observational study (Preprint)

How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns

Investigating the Prevalence of Reactive Online Searching in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study

Public Health Crisis Management Caused by COVID‐19: A Scientometrics Review

Building a Resilient Scientific Network for COVID-19 and Beyond

Data and Digital Solutions to Support Surveillance Strategies in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Scientometric Analysis of Public Health Emergencies: 1994–2020

Lessons for conservation from the mistakes of the COVID‐19 pandemic: The promise and peril of big data and new communication modalities

Quantifying Policy Responses to a Global Emergency: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID19 infodemic. The role and place of academics in science communication

How to Fight an Infodemic: The Four Pillars of Infodemic Management

Fundamental Shifts in Research, Ethics and Peer Review in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Communicating science in the COVID-19 news in the UK during Omicron waves: exploring representations of nature of science with epistemic network analysis

An Environmental Data Collection for COVID-19 Pandemic Research