Abstract:Single-cell expression profiling has opened up new vistas on cellular processes. Among other important results, one stand-out observation has been the confirmation of extensive cell-to-cell variability at the transcriptomic and proteomic level. Because most experimental analyses are destructive we only have access to snapshot data of cellular states. This loss of temporal information presents significant challenges in inferring dynamics, as well as causes of cell-to-cell variability. In particular, we are typically unable to separate dynamic variability from within individual systems (“intrinsic noise”) from variability across the population (“extrinsic noise”). Here we mathematically formalise this non-identifiability; but we also use this to identify how new experimental set-ups coupled to statistical noise decomposition can resolve this non-identifiability. For single-cell transcriptomic data we find that systems subject to population variation invariably inflate the apparent degree of burstiness of the underlying process. Such identifiability problems can, in principle, be remedied by dual-reporter assays, which separates total gene expression noise into intrinsic and extrinsic contributions; unfortunately, however, this requires pairs of strictly independent and identical gene reporters to be integrated into the same cell, which is difficult to implement experimentally in most systems. Here we demonstrate mathematically that, in some cases decomposition of transcriptional noise is possible with non-identical and not-necessarily independent reporters. We use our result to show that generic reporters lying in the same biochemical pathways (e.g. mRNA and protein) can replace dual reporters, enabling the noise decomposition to be obtained from only a single gene. Stochastic simulations are used to support our theory, and show that our “pathway-reporter” method compares favourably to the dual-reporter method.

Effects of transcriptional noise on estimates of gene and transcript expression in RNA sequencing experiments

Quantitative comparison of single-cell RNA sequencing versus single-molecule RNA imaging for quantifying transcriptional noise

Quantifying how post-transcriptional noise and gene copy number variation bias transcriptional parameter inference from mRNA distributions

Pathway dynamics can delineate the sources of transcriptional noise in gene expression

The Role of Input Noise in Transcriptional Regulation

Physiological RNA dynamics in RNA-Seq analysis.

Translation regulation by RNA stem-loops can reduce gene expression noise

Translation initiation events on structured eukaryotic mRNAs generate gene expression noise

Accuracy of RNA-Seq and Its Dependence on Sequencing Depth.

Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation

Extrinsic noise and heavy-tailed laws in gene expression

Uncovering the effect of RNA polymerase steric interactions on gene expression noise: analytical distributions of nascent and mature RNA numbers

Differences in molecular sampling and data processing explain variation among single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq experiments

Single-cell Transcriptomes Reveal Characteristics of MicroRNAs in Gene Expression Noise Reduction

Estimating intrinsic and extrinsic noise from single-cell gene expression measurements

Progress in Discovering Transcriptional Noise in Aging

Living in a noisy world—origins of gene expression noise and its impact on cellular decision‐making

Interpretable and tractable models of transcriptional noise for the rational design of single-molecule quantification experiments

Impact of gene annotation choice on the quantification of RNA-seq data

noisyR: enhancing biological signal in sequencing datasets by characterizing random technical noise

The Role of RNA Condensation in Reducing Gene Expression Noise