What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is: How the differences in gene expression (i.e., "noise") among individual cells are influenced by the genome and cellular environment. Specifically, the researchers developed a method called SARGENT (Single-cell Analysis of Reporter Gene Expression Noise and Transcriptome) to systematically measure the effects of different genomic locations on gene expression mean and noise, and to explore the contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic factors to gene expression noise. ### Background - **Gene expression noise**: Even among a population of homogeneous cells, there are significant differences in gene expression between individual cells, which is referred to as "noise." - **Factors affecting noise**: The genomic environment of a gene (such as enhancers, histone modifications, transcription factor binding, etc.) and the cell state (such as cell cycle, cell size, signaling pathways, etc.) can all influence gene expression noise. - **Limitations of existing methods**: Existing research methods are either limited to endogenous genes or rely on low-throughput imaging techniques, making it difficult to systematically quantify the impact of the genomic environment on gene expression noise. ### Research Objectives - **Develop a high-throughput method**: Develop a high-throughput method capable of simultaneously measuring the mean and noise of reporter gene expression at different genomic locations, as well as the global mRNA profile of individual cells. - **Analyze gene expression noise**: Use the SARGENT method to analyze the impact of different genomic locations on gene expression noise and distinguish the contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic factors to the noise. - **Explore cell sub-states**: Investigate the impact of cell sub-states (such as stem cell-like states and differentiated states) on gene expression noise. ### Methods - **SARGENT method**: - **Reporter gene design**: Design a reporter gene with a random barcode (location barcode, locBC) and insert it into different genomic locations. - **Cell processing**: Randomly integrate the reporter gene library into the genome of K562 cells using the piggyBac transposon system. - **Single-cell sequencing**: Capture the reporter gene expression and global mRNA profile of each cell through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). - **Data analysis**: Calculate the mean and noise of reporter gene expression at each genomic location and analyze their relationship with cell state. ### Results - **Correlation between mean and noise**: There is a strong correlation between the mean and noise of gene expression, but by removing the mean effect, mean-independent noise (MIN) can be obtained. - **Impact of different histone modifications**: Different histone modifications are associated with the mean and noise of gene expression. For example, H3K4me3 is associated with low noise, while H3K27ac and H3K4me1 are associated with high noise. - **Impact of transcription factor binding**: Certain transcription factor binding motifs (such as SP1 and E2F4) are associated with low noise, while other motifs (such as transcription factors with bHLH domains) are associated with high noise. - **Contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic factors**: Statistical analysis reveals that intrinsic factors (such as genomic environment) and extrinsic factors (such as cell state) each contribute approximately half to gene expression noise. - **Impact of cell sub-states**: Cells in a stem cell-like sub-state exhibit higher mean and lower noise, which is related to cell proliferation rate. ### Conclusion - **Effectiveness of the SARGENT method**: SARGENT is a powerful tool that can systematically measure the mean and noise of gene expression at different genomic locations and analyze their intrinsic and extrinsic influencing factors. - **Regulatory mechanisms of gene expression noise**: The study reveals the regulatory roles of different histone modifications and transcription factor binding motifs on gene expression noise, as well as the impact of cell sub-states on noise. Through these studies, the authors provide new perspectives and tools for understanding the complex regulatory mechanisms of gene expression noise.

Effect of genomic and cellular environments on gene expression noise

Living in a noisy world—origins of gene expression noise and its impact on cellular decision‐making

Noise in gene expression is coupled to growth rate

Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation

Genetic determinants of gene expression noise and its role in complex trait variation

Induction level determines signature of gene expression noise in cellular systems

Biological Sources of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Noise in cI Expression of Lysogenic Phage Lambda

Listening to the noise: random fluctuations reveal gene network parameters

Cis-Regulatory Logic Produces Gene-Expression Noise Describing Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Bacteria

Pathway dynamics can delineate the sources of transcriptional noise in gene expression

Intrinsic and extrinsic noise of gene expression in lineage trees

The effect of background noise and its removal on the analysis of single-cell expression data

Uncoupling gene expression noise along the central dogma using genome engineered human cell lines

Estimating intrinsic and extrinsic noise from single-cell gene expression measurements

Effect of transcription factor resource sharing on gene expression noise

Affinity and competition for TBP are molecular determinants of gene expression noise

Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise

CpG island composition differences are a source of gene expression noise indicative of promoter responsiveness

Division rate, cell size and proteome allocation: impact on gene expression noise and implications for the dynamics of genetic circuits

Controlled noise: evidence of epigenetic regulation of single-cell expression variability

Single-cell Transcriptomes Reveal Characteristics of MicroRNAs in Gene Expression Noise Reduction