Abstract:Single-cell expression profiling has opened up new vistas on cellular processes. Among other important results, one stand-out observation has been the confirmation of extensive cell-to-cell variability at the transcriptomic and proteomic level. Because most experimental analyses are destructive we only have access to snapshot data of cellular states. This loss of temporal information presents significant challenges in inferring dynamics, as well as causes of cell-to-cell variability. In particular, we are typically unable to separate dynamic variability from within individual systems (“intrinsic noise”) from variability across the population (“extrinsic noise”). Here we mathematically formalise this non-identifiability; but we also use this to identify how new experimental set-ups coupled to statistical noise decomposition can resolve this non-identifiability. For single-cell transcriptomic data we find that systems subject to population variation invariably inflate the apparent degree of burstiness of the underlying process. Such identifiability problems can, in principle, be remedied by dual-reporter assays, which separates total gene expression noise into intrinsic and extrinsic contributions; unfortunately, however, this requires pairs of strictly independent and identical gene reporters to be integrated into the same cell, which is difficult to implement experimentally in most systems. Here we demonstrate mathematically that, in some cases decomposition of transcriptional noise is possible with non-identical and not-necessarily independent reporters. We use our result to show that generic reporters lying in the same biochemical pathways (e.g. mRNA and protein) can replace dual reporters, enabling the noise decomposition to be obtained from only a single gene. Stochastic simulations are used to support our theory, and show that our “pathway-reporter” method compares favourably to the dual-reporter method.

The effect of background noise and its removal on the analysis of single-cell expression data

Characterization and decontamination of background noise in droplet-based single-cell protein expression data with DecontPro

Comprehensive Evaluation of Noise Reduction Methods for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments

A Contamination Focused Approach for Optimizing the Single-Cell RNA-seq Experiment

Quantitative comparison of single-cell RNA sequencing versus single-molecule RNA imaging for quantifying transcriptional noise

noisyR: enhancing biological signal in sequencing datasets by characterizing random technical noise

Characterizing contaminant noise in barcoded perturbation experiments

Precision and Accuracy of Single-Cell/Nuclei RNA Sequencing Data

Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows

Characterization and bioinformatic filtering of ambient gRNAs in single-cell CRISPR screens using CLEANSER

Tools for the Analysis of High-Dimensional Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Evaluating Imputation Methods for Single-Cell RNA-seq Data

Differences in molecular sampling and data processing explain variation among single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq experiments

Effect of genomic and cellular environments on gene expression noise

Pathway dynamics can delineate the sources of transcriptional noise in gene expression

Research on the Data Quality Factors Affecting Single-Cell Type Analysis

Optimal Gene Filtering for Single-Cell Data (Ogfsc)-a Gene Filtering Algorithm for Single-Cell RNA-seq Data

Influence of RNA extraction methods and library selection schemes on RNA-seq data

A systematic evaluation of single-cell RNA-sequencing imputation methods

SSBER: removing batch effect for single-cell RNA sequencing data