Should chemotherapy still be used to treat all muscle invasive bladder cancer in the “era of immunotherapy”?
Jonathan J. Duplisea,Colin P. N. Dinney
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2019.1625773
2019-06-05
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
Abstract:Platinum-based chemotherapy has served as the mainstay systemic treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) for decades. Its use in the neoadjuvant (NAC), adjuvant (AC), and salvage setting has led to improved overall survival for those with localized disease and prolonged life for those with metastatic disease [<span><a href="#">1</a><span> <span>Grossman <span>HB</span></span>, <span>Natale <span>RB</span></span>, <span>Tangen <span>CM</span></span>, et al. <span>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer</span>. N Engl J Med. <span>2003</span>;349(9):<span>859</span>–<span>866</span>.<span><span><a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0001&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=10.1056%2FNEJMoa022148">[Crossref]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0001&dbid=8&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=12944571">[PubMed]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0001&dbid=128&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=000184968400006">[Web of Science ®]</a></span> <span>, <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2003&pages=859-866&issue=9&author=HB+Grossman&author=RB+Natale&author=CM+Tangen&title=Neoadjuvant+chemotherapy+plus+cystectomy+compared+with+cystectomy+alone+for+locally+advanced+bladder+cancer">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>,<span><a href="#">2</a><span> <span>Loehrer <span>PJ</span> Sr.</span>, <span>Einhorn <span>LH</span></span>, <span>Elson <span>PJ</span></span>, et al. <span>A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study</span>. J Clin Oncol. <span>1992</span>;10(7):<span>1066</span>–<span>1073</span>.<span><span><a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0002&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=10.1200%2FJCO.1992.10.7.1066">[Crossref]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0002&dbid=8&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=1607913">[PubMed]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0002&dbid=128&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=A1992JA77100007">[Web of Science ®]</a></span> <span>, <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=1992&pages=1066-1073&issue=7&author=PJ+Loehrer&author=LH+Einhorn&author=PJ+Elson&title=A+randomized+comparison+of+cisplatin+alone+or+in+combination+with+methotrexate%2C+vinblastine%2C+and+doxorubicin+in+patients+with+metastatic+urothelial+carcinoma%3A+a+cooperative+group+study">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>]. Recently, we have come to appreciate that MIBC is a heterogeneous disease that does not uniformly respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Furthermore, there are many patients with organ-confined MIBC who are appropriately managed by radical cystectomy alone [<span><a href="#">3</a><span> <span>Culp <span>SH</span></span>, <span>Dickstein <span>RJ</span></span>, <span>Grossman <span>HB</span></span>, et al. <span>Refining patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy</span>. J Urol. <span>2014</span>;191(1):<span>40</span>–<span>47</span>.<span><span><a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0003&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=10.1016%2Fj.juro.2013.07.061">[Crossref]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0003&dbid=8&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=23911605">[PubMed]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0003&dbid=128&doi=10.1080%2F14737140.2019.1625773&key=000329191700010">[Web of Science ®]</a></span> <span>, <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2014&pages=40-47&issue=1&author=SH+Culp&author=RJ+Dickstein&author=HB+Grossman&title=Refining+patient+selection+for+neoadjuvant+chemotherapy+before+radical+cystectomy">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>]. In turn, this begs the question whether cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the appropriate mainstay systemic treatment for all patients with MIBC today.Immunotherapy has taken the limelight as a systemic treatment option for a multitude of cancers. Many view it as less toxic than conventional chemotherapy and because of the complete responses seen in some patients; some believe it to be the future of systemic therapy. In bladder cancer alone we have witnessed the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors agents over the past two years.As we move forward using inherent tumor and patient characteristics to provide 'personalized medicine', we must step-back and re-evaluate our current practice patterns. In doing so, we must assess the role of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in this new era of immuno-oncology.Over the past decade, significant effort has been put <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>
oncology