THE USE OF PSYCHOTHERAPY AND BEHAVIOR THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF AN OBSESSIONAL DISORDER: AN EXPERIMENTAL CASE STUDY

E. Gullick,E. Blanchard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3000-4_16

1973-06-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Phase 3 KEYNOTE-992 study of pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy versus placebo plus chemoradiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Shilpa Gupta,Yasuhisa Fujii,Michiel Simon Van Der Heijden,Andrew James Weickhardt,Nicholas D. James,Shahrokh F. Shariat,Jeff M. Michalski,Kentaro Imai,Xiao Fang,Ekta Kapadia,Neal D. Shore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.tps720

IF: 45.3

2024-01-31

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:TPS720 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a recommended treatment option for patients (pts) with MIBC who seek a bladder-preserving alternative to radical cystectomy and/or not candidates for radical cystectomy. The anti–PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab is approved for metastatic bladder cancer and non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-992 study (NCT04241185) is evaluating efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus CRT versus placebo plus CRT in pts with MIBC who chose bladder preservation. Methods: Eligibility criteria include adultswho have a histologically confirmed initial diagnosis of MIBC (T2-T4aN0M0) with ≥50% urothelial histology, ECOG PS score of 0 to 2, have received no prior therapy with anti–PD-1/L1 or agents directed to another stimulatory or coinhibitory T-cell receptor, and have planned treatment with one of the specified radiosensitizing chemotherapies. Prior treatment for NMIBC with intravesical instillation therapy such as BCG or intravesical chemotherapy is permitted. Approximately 636 pts will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 400 mg IV or placebo IV every 6 weeks for up to 9 cycles, both with CRT. Investigator’s choice of chemotherapy will be specified before random assignment. Pts will be stratified by ECOG PS (0 and 1 vs 2), PD-L1 combined positive score (<10 vs ≥10), T stage (T2 vs T3 and T4), and geographic region (United States vs European Union vs rest of the world). Radiosensitizing chemotherapy will be cisplatin monotherapy (35 mg/m 2 IV weekly on day 1), 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m 2 on days 1-5 and days 22-26) plus mitomycin C (12 mg/m 2 on day 1), or gemcitabine monotherapy (27 mg/m 2 IV twice weekly on days 1 and 4). Radiation therapy will be conventional radiotherapy consisting of 64 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction over 6.5 weeks (whole bladder with or without pelvic nodes) or hypofractionated radiotherapy consisting of 55 Gy at 2.75 Gy/fraction over 4 weeks (whole bladder only). Imaging via CT and CT urography or magnetic resonance urography will be performed 10 weeks after completion of CRT, every 12 weeks until the end of year 2, then every 24 weeks thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) will be monitored throughout the study and up to 30 days after cessation of treatment (90 days for serious AEs). Primary end point is bladder-intact event-free survival (defined as time from random assignment to first documented occurrence of residual/recurrent MIBC, nodal or distant metastases, radical cystectomy, or death from any cause) as assessed by blinded independent central review and/or central pathology review. Secondary end points are overall survival, metastasis-free survival, time to cystectomy, time to occurrence of NMIBC, safety and tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes. Enrollment is ongoing in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Clinical trial information: NCT04241185 .

oncology
Perioperative Immunotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Amisha Singh,Appledene S. Osbourne,Vadim S. Koshkin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01113-z

2023-07-12

Current Treatment Options in Oncology

Abstract:There is an acute unmet need to develop novel treatment regimens in the perioperative setting since many patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) are not eligible for the current standard of care (SOC) neoadjuvant treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both as monotherapy and in combination regimens with other ICIs, chemotherapy, or targeted drugs, may provide safe and clinically effective treatment options that could revolutionize current standard of care. In the neoadjuvant setting, compelling data from phase II clinical trials suggests that single-agent immunotherapy, as well as dual-checkpoint blockade, may emerge as reasonable alternatives to traditional cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Prospective studies combining ICIs with chemotherapy or with antibody-drug conjugates have also demonstrated robust outcomes. However, these studies are not yet practice changing and data from larger randomized studies are needed to confirm this benefit. In the adjuvant setting, nivolumab is the FDA-approved treatment based on a disease-free survival benefit relative to placebo in a randomized trial. However, it will be important to confirm an overall survival benefit of this treatment and to better identify patients who need additional adjuvant treatment based on novel biomarker data. The treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer is moving toward the individualization of treatment options based on specific tumor and patient characteristics and away from the one-size-fits-all approach that has dominated this space for the last couple of decades. Emerging biomarker data, such as with ctDNA, suggests that immunotherapy may confer greater benefit to selected patients. Identifying who those patients are will be of paramount importance since additional treatments always come with additional toxicities. On the other hand, the more favorable toxicity profiles of certain immunotherapy-based regimens may make them superior options for some patients who would otherwise be unable to tolerate other systemic regimens. In the near future, it is likely that subsets of patients with MIBC will be receiving treatments with predominantly immunotherapy-based regimens while many patients may still be treated with regimens containing a cisplatin-based chemotherapy backbone. Currently ongoing clinical trials will help to better define patient populations optimized for each treatment.

oncology
Perioperative immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

In-Ho Kim,Hyo Jin Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.11.31

2020-12-01

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:Radical cystectomy is the standard of care treatment for patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, patients with MIBC experience high rates of relapse despite primary therapy, and perioperative strategy is an important treatment option. Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved prognosis, and adjuvant chemotherapy is also an important option for selected patients. However, perioperative chemotherapy is not effective in some patients. Moreover, the currently recommended perioperative treatment is cisplatin-based chemotherapy; approximately 50% of the patients are ineligilble for cisplatin treatment owing to various reasons such as medical comorbidities, poor performance status, and renal insufficiency. The recent success of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) suggests that ICIs is the new standard therapy for patients with metastatic bladder cancer. Furthermore, ICIs showed more favorable toxicity profiles than conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. These results indicate that ICIs may play a role in the treatment of muscle-invasive disease, and many recent studies have been conducted in a perioperative setting. The present review aims to summarize and discuss the current perioperative strategy of immunotherapy focused on ICIs based on recent ongoing clinical trials.

urology & nephrology,andrology
2376P Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Following Tri-Modality Treatment for Selected Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

S. B. Qin,W. Yu,Z. S. He,X. S. Gao,H. Hao,Y. Bai,H. Z. Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.1025

IF: 51.769

2023-01-01

Annals of Oncology

Abstract:This is a phase 2, single arm, single-site study of Pembrolizumab as maintenance therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) participants who has received maximum Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and tri-modality treatment (TMT) and achieved complete response (CR). This trial includes Patients with cT2-4N0M0 MIBC who declined or were ineligible for cystectomy (RC), and achieved CR after receiving maximal TURBT then Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) boost to bladder tumor or tumor bed and concurrent radio-chemotherapy. During SABR, intravesical installation of isovolumetric saline through urinary catheter ensured adequate bladder filling. After TMT, patients who achieved CR will receive Pembrolizumab as maintenance therapy. Pembrolizumab (200 mg q3w) monotherapy will begin on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle and will continue for up to 17 cycles (approximately 1 year). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). From January 11, 2022 to April 20, 2023, twenty-three patients with MIBC were enrolled. The median age of included patients was 68 years and clinical stage ranged from cT2 (n=20) to cT3 (n=3). TURBT was visibly complete in twelve cases. After a median follow-up time of 6 months, 5/23 (21.7%) patients reported immune-related AEs, which included Grade 2 myositis, hypothyroidism, pneumonitis and cystitis, and had no ongoing toxicity after administration of steroids. The estimated 1-year PFS, overall survival and local control rate was 78%, 94.4% and 94.7%. One patient experienced local recurrence with MIBC and bone metastasis respectively after 7 months of TMT. One patient died from pulmonary infection related to COVID-19, the others are alive with no evidence of cancer and with intact well-functioning urinary bladder at median follow-up of 6 months. Pembrolizumab maintenance therapy after SABR boost to bladder tumor and concurrent radio-chemotherapy was well-tolerated with promising efficacy in the early analysis. Immune related toxicity was consistent with prior monotherapy trials. Selected correlative analyses from serially collected blood and tissue specimens will be presented.
The Escherichia coli terB sequence affects maintenance of a plasmid with the M13 phage replication origin

M. Uzest,S. Ehrlich,B. Michel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.23.7695-7697.1991

IF: 3.2

1991-12-01

Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract:Replication initiated at the bacteriophage M13 origin can be affected by interaction of a properly oriented termination signal terB and the Tus protein. The effect can be alleviated by overproduction of the M13 replication gene protein II.
Phase 3 KEYNOTE-676 cohort A: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) with or without pembrolizumab for high-risk (HR) non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) that persists/recurs after BCG induction.

Neal D. Shore,Hiroyuki Nishiyama,Shahrokh F. Shariat,Gary Steinberg,Ashish M. Kamat,Shaheen Riadh Alanee,Kijoeng Nam,Kentaro Imai,Ekta Kapadia,Noah M. Hahn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.tps722

IF: 45.3

2024-01-31

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:TPS722 Background: Intravesical instillation of BCG is a standard-of-care treatment for patients with HR NMIBC, but up to 50% of patients later experience disease recurrence or progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) despite BCG treatment. In the phase 2 KEYNOTE-057 study (NCT02625961), pembrolizumab monotherapy was shown to have antitumor activity in patients with HR BCG–unresponsive NMIBC who had carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumors and in patients with only papillary tumors. In cohort A of the randomized, phase 3 KEYNOTE-676 trial (NCT03711032), pembrolizumab plus BCG versus BCG alone is being evaluated in patients with persistent/recurrent HR NMIBC after first BCG induction. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include adults with histologically confirmed HR NMIBC (T1, high-grade Ta, and/or CIS) that is persistent/recurrent following 1 adequate course of BCG induction therapy, have no concurrent extravesical disease or history of extravesical disease that recurred within 2 years, have an ECOG PS score of 0 to 2, and have undergone cystoscopy/TURBT ≤12 weeks before randomization. Approximately 430 patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks plus BCG or BCG alone. BCG (50 mg) will be administered by intravesical instillation as induction therapy once weekly for 6 weeks and then as maintenance therapy once weekly for 3 weeks at weeks 13 and 25, then every 24 weeks (Q24W) thereafter. Treatment will continue for approximately 2 years (pembrolizumab) or 3 years (BCG), or until confirmed persistent/recurrent HR NMIBC or disease progression to MIBC or metastatic bladder cancer, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Randomization to treatment will be stratified by PD-L1 combined positive score (≥10 or ˂10), histology (CIS or non-CIS), and NMIBC disease history (persistence/recurrence 0 to ≤6 months or recurrence ˃6 to ≤12 months or recurrence ˃12 to ≤24 months). Response will be assessed by local cystoscopy and blinded independent central review of urine cytology and biopsy (as applicable) every 12 weeks for years 1 to 2 and Q24W for years 3 to 5. Computed tomography urography will occur every 72 weeks through year 5, then every 104 weeks thereafter. The primary end point is complete response rate in patients with CIS. Secondary end points are duration of response in patients with CIS, event-free survival, recurrence-free survival, time to cystectomy, overall survival, disease-specific survival, safety and tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes. Enrollment incohort A of KEYNOTE-676 is ongoing in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Clinical trial information: NCT03711032 .

oncology
Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Split-Dose Cisplatin Plus Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Tracy L. Rose,Michael R. Harrison,Allison M. Deal,Sundhar Ramalingam,Young E. Whang,Blaine Brower,Mary Dunn,Chelsea K. Osterman,Hillary M. Heiling,Marc A. Bjurlin,Angela B. Smith,Matthew E. Nielsen,Hung-Jui Tan,Eric Wallen,Michael E. Woods,Daniel George,Tian Zhang,Anthony Drier,William Y. Kim,Matthew I. Milowsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01003

IF: 45.3

2021-08-26

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. METHODS Patients with clinical T2-4aN0/XM0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer eligible for RC were enrolled. The initial six patients received lead-in pembrolizumab 200 mg once 2 weeks prior to pembrolizumab 200 mg once on day 1, cisplatin 70 mg/m 2 once on day 1, and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 once on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for four cycles. This schedule was discontinued for toxicity and subsequent patients received cisplatin 35 mg/m 2 once on days 1 and 8 without lead-in pembrolizumab. The primary end point was pathologic downstaging (< pT2N0) with null and alternative hypothesis rates of 35% and 55%, respectively. Secondary end points were toxicity including patient-reported outcomes, complete pathologic response (pT0N0), event-free survival, and overall survival. Association of pathologic downstaging with programmed cell death ligand 1 staining was explored. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients were enrolled between June 2016 and March 2020 (72% cT2, 23% cT3, and 5% cT4a). Patients received a median of four cycles of therapy. All patients underwent RC except one who declined. Twenty-two of 39 patients (56% [95% CI, 40 to 72]) achieved < pT2N0 and 14 of 39 (36% [95% CI, 21 to 53]) achieved pT0N0. Most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade were thrombocytopenia (74%), anemia (69%), neutropenia (67%), and hypomagnesemia (67%). One patient had new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis related to pembrolizumab and no patients required steroids for immune-related AEs. Clinicians consistently under-reported AEs when compared with patients. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pembrolizumab met its primary end point for improved pathologic downstaging and was generally safe. A global study of perioperative chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab or placebo is ongoing.

oncology
ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab or Placebo in Combination with Adjuvant Chemotherapy With/without Radiotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

T. Van Gorp,M. Mirza,A. Lortholary,I. Vergote,D. Cibula,A. Walther,A. Savarese,M-P Barretina-Ginesta,F. Ortac,C. Papadimitriou,L. Bodnar,C-H Lai,K. Hasegawa,X. Xie,E. L. Barber,R. L. Coleman,S. Keefe,R. Orlowski,B. Slomovitz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps5608

IF: 45.3

2021-01-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:TPS5608 Background: Pembrolizumab, a selective humanized anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated activity in patients with previously treated mismatch repair (MMR) deficient (dMMR; 57.1% ORR as monotherapy and 63.6% ORR as combination therapy with lenvatinib) and MMR proficient (pMMR; 36.2% ORR as combination therapy with lenvatinib) endometrial cancer (EC). ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of pembrolizumab or placebo in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy in patients with EC. Methods: Eligible patients are ≥18 years old with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed high-risk (stage I/II non-endometrioid, stage III/IVa, p53 abnormality) EC (carcinoma or carcinosarcoma) following surgery with curative intent with no evidence of disease post-operatively or on imaging, and without prior systemic therapy/radiotherapy. In total, ̃990 patients are randomized to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo Q3W for 6 cycles + chemotherapy (carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5 or 6 + paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Q3W or carboplatin AUC 2 or 2.7 + paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 QW) in stage 1. Patients receive pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo Q6W for 6 cycles in stage 2 per their treatment assignment. At the investigator’s discretion, radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] and/or brachytherapy) ± radiosensitizing cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (days 1 and 29) may be administered after completion of chemotherapy. Randomization is stratified by MMR status (pMMR vs dMMR) and, within pMMR, by planned radiation therapy (cisplatin-EBRT vs EBRT vs no EBRT), histology (endometrioid vs non-endometrioid), and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) surgical stage (I/II vs III/IVA). Dual primary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS; per investigator assessment) and overall survival (OS), both estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, with a stratified log-rank test to assess treatment differences and a Cox proportional hazard model with Efron’s method of tie handling to assess the magnitude of treatment differences. Secondary endpoints include DFS (per blinded independent central review), DFS (per investigator assessment) and OS by biomarker status (PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden), safety (per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) and quality of life (per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 [EORTC QLQ-C30] and Endometrial Cancer Module [EORTC QLQ-EN24]). The study began enrollment in December 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04634877.
Current and recent clinical trials for perioperative systemic therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review

Vishal Vashistha,David I Quinn,Tanya B Dorff,Siamak Daneshmand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-966

IF: 4.638

2014-12-01

BMC Cancer

Abstract:BackgroundAlthough Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) is increasing in incidence, treatment has largely remained limited to radical cystectomy with or without cisplatin-based neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. We reviewed the current and recent clinical trials evaluating perioperative chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and novel therapeutic regimens for MIBC patients undergoing radical cystectomy.MethodsAn overview of perioperative MIBC management was conducted initially using MEDLINE. The Clinical Trials Registry and MEDLINE were further searched specifically for perioperative MIBC chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and other novel therapeutic approaches. Trials involving non-perioperative management, operative management other than radical cystectomy, multiple tumors, or purely superficial or metastatic disease were excluded from selection. These criteria were not specifically fulfilled for mTOR inhibitor and immune therapy trials. Only phase III chemotherapy and phase II targeted therapy trials found in the Clinical Trials Registry were selected. MEDLINE searches of specific treatments were limited to January 2009 to January 2014 whereas the Clinical Trials Registry search had no timeline. Systematic MEDLINE searches had no phase restrictions. Trials known by the authors to fulfill search criteria but were not found via searches were also selected.ResultsTwenty-five trials were selected from the Clinical Trials Registry including 7 phase III chemotherapy trials, 11 Phase II targeted therapy trials, 3 immune therapy trials, 1 mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor trial, and 3 gene and vaccine therapy trials. Nine trials have been completed and 5 have been terminated early or withdrawn. Nine trials have data available when individually searched using MEDLINE and/or Google. Systematic searches of MEDLINE separately found 12 trials in the past 5 years. Two phase III chemotherapy trials were selected based on knowledge by the authors. No phase III trials of targeted therapy have been registered or published.ConclusionsNew trials are currently being conducted that may revolutionize MIBC treatment preceding or following cystectomy. Head-to-head phase III trials of perioperative chemotherapy and further phase II and phase III trials of targeted therapy and other therapeutic approaches are necessary before the current cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy paradigm is altered.

oncology
Muscle invasive bladder cancer: where is the field headed?

Pooja Ghatalia,Jasmeet Kaur,Guru Sonpavde

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2023.2238607

2023-07-23

Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

Abstract:The standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy or upfront radical cystectomy for cisplatin-ineligible patients. In those who are ineligible for or refuse radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy with chemoradiation is offered. However, with the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin in the metastatic setting, several trials are implementing these drugs in the neoadjuvant setting for cisplatin ineligible patients. Indeed, nivolumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Clinical trials using ICI, ICI/ICI, and ICI/chemotherapy combination therapies in the perioperative setting have been completed. These clinical trials have demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI are safe and have encouraging pCR, making them promising treatment options. Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin alone and in combination with pembrolizumab is also being studied, and preliminarily to have promising activity. ICI is also being combined with radiation therapy (RT) and early data indicate that ICI combined with RT or chemo-RT may be safe with promising activity. Biomarkers are urgently needed to identify appropriate treatment options for individual patients. The use of novel treatment approaches and biomarkers will help shape the future of precision therapy for MIBC and enable bladder preservation.

medicine, research & experimental,biotechnology & applied microbiology
Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy or Upfront Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer

Roger Li,Luigi Nocera,Kyle M Rose,Daniele Raggi,Shreyas Naidu,Chiara Mercinelli,Antonio Cigliola,Valentina Tateo,Damiano Patanè,G Daniel Grass,Scott M Gilbert,Wade J Sexton,Marco Bandini,Marco Moschini,Alberto Briganti,Francesco Montorsi,Philippe E Spiess,Andrea Necchi,Kyle M. Rose,G. Daniel Grass,Scott M. Gilbert,Wade J. Sexton,Philippe E. Spiess

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.008

IF: 8.208

2024-01-01

European Urology Oncology

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Recent progresses in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have challenged the therapeutic standards in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC).OBJECTIVE: To compare neoadjuvant pembrolizumab followed by radical cystectomy (RC) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RC or upfront RC, according to cisplatin eligibility.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted two separate analyses for cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible cT2-4N0M0 MIBC patients. We used a propensity score adjustment that relied on inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW).INTERVENTION: Pembrolizumab within the PURE-01 trial, and NAC and RC or upfront RC from a high-volume tertiary care referral center.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint in both analyses was event-free survival (EFS), defined as freedom from recurrence, and/or death from any cause indexed from the date of treatment initiation or RC. The secondary endpoints included EFS in propensity score-matched patients, pathologic response rate, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after RC.RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 458 patients who underwent RC, with or without NAC, at Moffitt Cancer Center between October 2005 and October 2020, and 146 patients enrolled in PURE-01 were analyzed. In cisplatin-ineligible patients, EFS was superior in those receiving pembrolizumab (p < 0.001). The estimated 3-yr EFS was 77.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.5-95.2) for pembrolizumab and RC, and 36.1% (95% CI: 28.6-45.5) for upfront RC. EFS remained superior in those receiving neoadjuvant ICI (NICI) following IPTW (p < 0.001). In cisplatin-eligible patients, EFS was superior in those receiving pembrolizumab and RC (p < 0.001). The estimated 3-yr EFS was 86.9% (95% CI: 80.9-93.3) for pembrolizumab and 63.5% (95% CI: 56.5-71.4) for NAC. EFS remained superior in those receiving NICI following IPTW (p < 0.001). Pathologic responses and RFS in pembrolizumab-treated patients were also superior to those in NAC-treated patients. Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study.CONCLUSIONS: In the first ever reported comprehensive comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant ICI and NAC, followed by RC, or upfront RC, we report increased responses and improved oncologic outcomes with neoadjuvant ICI in patients with MIBC.PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared the results obtained from the use of pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy with standard-of-care treatments in patients with bladder carcinoma infiltrating the muscle layer. We reported increased response and survival rates possibilities with the use of immunotherapy, anticipating the possibility to set new therapeutic standards in these patients, pending the results of ongoing randomized studies.

oncology,urology & nephrology
Intravesical recombinant BCG followed by perioperative chemo-immunotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): A multicenter, single arm phase 2 trial (SAKK 06/19).

Richard Cathomas,Martin Spahn,Stefanie Hayoz,Sabrina Chiquet,Martina Schneider,Cyrill A. Rentsch,Sacha Rothschild,Ulf Petrausch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.tps707

IF: 45.3

2024-01-31

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:TPS707 Background: The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the perioperative setting of localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is extensively investigated and several results from phase 2 trials have been published. While promising, the pathological complete remission rate (pCR, ypT0 ypN0) achieved with ICI-containing regimens appears similar to cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. Further improvement is needed. Intravesical BCG has successfully been used for decades for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in patients (pts) with carcinoma in situ (CIS) and as adjuvant treatment for high-risk papillary tumors. Intravesical BCG induces a local inflammation leading to induction of the innate immune system, probably followed by a tumor-specific adaptive immune response. Recently, a novel recombinant BCG vaccine (VPM1002BC) has been developed and a clinical study in BCG-refractory NMIBC (SAKK 06/14, Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;5(2):195-202.) has demonstrated good safety with low local toxicity and promising efficacy. We hypothesize that induction therapy with intravesical VPM1002BC improves the efficacy of systemic perioperative chemo-immunotherapy in pts with operable MIBC. Methods: SAKK 06/19 is an open-label single arm phase II trial for pts with operable pT2 or cT2-T4a cN0-1 MIBC without contraindication for cisplatin. Prior intravesical BCG is excluded as are pts unable to keep BCG instillation for less than 1 hour. Intravesical VPM1002BC is administered weekly for 3 instillations. Atezolizumab (atezo) 1200mg is given on day 1 and then every 3 weeks (q3w) for four times. Chemotherapy with cisplatin (70mg/m2 day 1) and gemcitabine (1000mg/m2 day 1 & 8) q3w is started on day 22 and given for four cycles followed by radical cystectomy and lymphadenctomy. Atezo is continued after surgery for 13 cycles in case of residual muscle invasive disease (≥ypT2) or positive lymph nodes (ypN+) only. pCR at cystectomy is the primary endpoint. A total of 46 pts is needed (including 15% dropout rate) using Simon’s minimax two-stage design with type I error 5%, power 80%, a null hypothesis of ≤35% pCR and an alternative hypothesis of ≥55% pCR. Secondary endpoints include pathological response rate (<ypT2N0), event-free survival, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, feasibility and toxicity. An interim safety analysis will be performed after the first 12 pts have completed neoadjuvant treatment specifically assessing toxicity possibly associated with intravesical BCG application. An interim efficacy analysis will be performed after the first 21 pts have undergone surgery. Accrual to the study is currently ongoing (NCT04630730). Clinical trial information: NCT04630730 .

oncology
Results from BLASST-1 (Bladder Cancer Signal Seeking Trial) of nivolumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing cystectomy.

Shilpa Gupta,Guru Sonpavde,Christopher J. Weight,Bradley Alexander McGregor,Sumati Gupta,Benjamin Louis Maughan,Xiao X. Wei,Ewan Gibb,Bharat Thyagarajan,David Johnson Einstein,Christopher B. Dechet,William Thomas Lowrance,Paari J Murugan,Kerry L. Kilbridge,Neeraj Agarwal,Elai Davicioni,Markus Eckstein,Matthew Mossanen,Mark A. Preston,Badrinath R. Konety

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.439

IF: 45.3

2020-02-20

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:439 Background: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in MIBC improves survival which correlates with pathologic response (PaR) at radical cystectomy (RC). The combination of immunotherapy and NAC may improve PaR and outcomes in MIBC. We tested the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (N) with gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC in our phase II trial (NCT03294304). Methods: Eligible pts with MIBC (cT2-T4a, N≤1, M0) who were candidates for RC were enrolled. Pts received C (70mg/m2) IV on D1, G (1000mg/m2) on D1,D8 and N (360 mg) IV on D8 every 21 days for 4 cycles followed by RC within 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was PaR (≤pT1,N0). Secondary objectives were safety of GC+N and PFS at 2 years. The correlative objectives based on pre-treatment biopsies were correlation of PaR with 1) WGS 2) molecular subtypes of BC; 3) PD-L1 expression; 4) baseline TILs, CD3, CD8 and CD56.. Evaluable pts. should have received at least 1 dose of N. PaR will be summarized by the PaR rate as estimated by the sample proportion with exact 95% confidence intervals. We specified a null PaR of 0.35 and an alternative hypothesis of 0.55; we will reject the null hypothesis if at least 20 of 41 pts. have a PaR. Results: Between Feb 2018 and June 2019, 41 pts. were enrolled (cT2N0 90%, cT3N0 7%, cT4N1 3%); 2 patients refused surgery but were included in ITT population. PaR was observed in 27/41 pts. (65.8%), including pts with N1 disease. The combination was safe with manageable toxicities and no deaths from treatment. Majority of AEs were from GC; the overall rates of grade 3-4 AEs was 20%, majority being neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and renal insufficiency. Immune related AEs were seen in 3 patients, 2 had "adenitis" which wasymptomatic,1 pt developed Guillian Barre Syndrome after surgery, which resolved with IVIG; and none of them required steroids. There was no delay in time to RC and no unexpected surgical complications from treatment. Patients are being followed for progression and survival. Correlative work is ongoing. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant N+GC is safe and effective in MIBC with significant pathologic downstaging rates and no added toxicities or delay to surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT03294304.

oncology
Current and Future Landscape of Perioperative Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Jorge Esteban-Villarrubia,Javier Torres-Jiménez,Carolina Bueno-Bravo,Rebeca García-Mondaray,José Daniel Subiela,Pablo Gajate

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030566

2023-01-18

Cancers

Abstract:Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, less than half of patients are candidates for this treatment, and 50% will develop metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be offered if neoadjuvant treatment has not been administered for suitable patients. It is important to reduce the risk of systemic recurrence and improve the prognosis of localized MIBC. Systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has evolved in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates or FGFR inhibitors, are new therapeutic alternatives and have shown their benefit in advanced disease. Currently, several clinical trials are investigating the role of these drugs, as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings with promising outcomes. In addition, the development of predictive biomarkers could predict responses to neoadjuvant therapies.

oncology
Preliminary results from a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative disitamab vedotin (RC48-ADC) plus cadonilimab (AK104, PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) for HER2-expressing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Sujun Han,Yong Zhang,Xiongjun Ye,Hongzhe Shi,Bolin Jia,Feiya Yang,Xingang Bi,Xin Wang,Wasilijiang Wahafu,Hongsong Bai,Linjun Hu,Nianzeng Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e16591

IF: 45.3

2024-06-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:e16591 Background: The current standard of care for MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC). However, more than 40% patients are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The adverse reactions, comorbidities and high recurrence rate also limited the implementation of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The combination application in perioperative of RC48-ADC and PD-1/CTLA-4 antibody may have synergistic anti-tumor effects and achieve more clinical benefit. Methods: This single arm, open-label, multicenter study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of disitamab vedotin (RC48-ADC), a humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, plus cadonilimab (AK104, PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) as a novel neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve HER2-expressing (Immunohistochemistry, IHC 1+, 2+, 3+) MIBC (T2-T4a, N0-1, M0; ECOG PS score 0-1). Eligible pts received neoadjuvant RC48-ADC (2.0 mg/kg D1 Q2W, 4 cycles) + AK104 (6.0 mg/kg D1 Q2W, 4 cycles) followed by RC and RC48-ADC (2.0 mg/kg D1 Q3W, 6 cycles) + AK104 (10.0 mg/kg D1 Q3W, 14 cycles) of adjuvant treatment post-surgery. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR, pT0N0M0). Secondary end points were pathologic downstaging rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. Results: As of January 2024, 18 (16 males, 2 Females) out of the planned 36 pts have been enrolled in the study with median age of 65.5 (44-80) years. HER2 expression was positive (IHC 2+ or 3+) in 84.6% pts, and PD-L1 positive (CPS ≥ 10) in 50%. Five pts had completed neoadjuvant therapy, and 2 pts (2/5) achieved partial response (PR), while 3 (3/5) stable disease (SD), with 100% (5/5) disease control rate (DCR). Four pts underwent RC and 1 refused, all 4 pts (100%) were pathologic downstaging to ≤ypT1N0M0, and 2 of them (2/4, 50%) achieved pCR who were both assessed as SD by imaging techniques before. The most common TRAEs in 14 pts who had undergone more than 1 cycle treatment was pruritus (35.7%). Two cases of Grade ≥3 TRAEs were observed (14.3%), a patient bearing background disease of hypertension experienced grade 4 myocarditis, and another patient with underlying renal insufficiency experienced grade 3 diarrhea. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety in perioperative of HER2 targeting ADC plus PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody in HER2-expressing MIBCs. And neoadjuvant RC48-ADC combined with AK104 showed promising anti-tumor activity with high pCR rate and well tolerance in MIBC pts. More specific pathological assessment results and long-term survival data post adjuvant therapy are worth anticipating. Clinical trial information: NCT06074484 .

oncology
Neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab in persons with resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Kaiwen Li,Wenlong Zhong,Jinhai Fan,Shaogang Wang,Dexin Yu,Tao Xu,Jiaju Lyu,Shaoxu Wu,Tao Qin,Zhuo Wu,Longhao Xu,Kaijie Wu,Zheng Liu,Zhiquan Hu,Fan Li,Jinyou Wang,Qi Wang,Jie Min,Zhiqiang Zhang,Luping Yu,Sentai Ding,Longfei Huang,Tingting Zhao,Jian Huang,Tianxin Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-024-00822-0

Abstract:Programmed death 1 blockade (tislelizumab) has been approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma but not as part of neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In this multicenter single-arm trial (ChiCTR2000037670), 65 participants with cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC received neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab; 57 of them underwent radical cystectomy (RC). The primary endpoint of pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 50.9% (29/57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37.3-64.4%) and the pathologic downstaging (secondary endpoint) rate was 75.4% (43/57, 95% CI 62.2-85.9%) in participants undergoing RC. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed three MIBC molecular subtypes (S): S1 (immune-desert) with activated cell-cycle pathway, S2 (immune-excluded) with activated transforming growth factor-β pathway and S3 (immune-inflamed) with upregulated interferon-α and interferon-γ response. Post hoc analysis showed pCR rates of 16% (3/19, S1), 77% (10/13, S2) and 80% (12/15, S3) (P = 0.006). In conclusion, neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab for MIBC was compatible with an enhanced pCR rate.
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shibo Huang,Yanping Huang,Chunyan Li,Yiwen Liang,Miaoyan Huang,Raoshan Luo,Weiming Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1332213

IF: 7.3

2024-01-09

Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract:Introduction: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors [PD-(L)1 inhibitors] for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). Materials and methods: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 21 CENTRAL) were searched for articles studying neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors for MIBC. The search time period was from the establishment of each database to 21 July 2023. Meta-analyses of pCR, pPR, Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate, RFS, and OS were performed. Results: In total, 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. The overall pooled pCR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.36 (95%CI=0.30–0.42, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled PCR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.27 (95%CI=0.19–0.35, p=0.1), 0.41 (95%CI=0.21–0.62, p=0.01), 0.43 (95%CI=0.35–0.50, p=0.06), respectively. The overall pooled pPR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.53 (95%CI=0.46–0.60, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled pPR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.36 (95%CI=0.22–0.51, p=0.01), 0.51 (95%CI=0.39–0.62, p=0.43), and 0.61 (95%CI=0.53–0.69, p=0.01), respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves for OS and RFS were reconstructed, but there was no significant difference among three groups in terms of OS or RFS. The pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.15 (95%CI=0.09–0.22, p=0.00%). In subgroup analysis, the pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.07 (95%CI=0.04–0.11, p=0.84), 0.31 (95%CI=0.16–0.47, p=0.06), and 0.17 (95%CI=0.06–0.31, I 2 = 71.27%, p=0.01), respectively. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors were feasible and safe for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Compared with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with higher pCR and pPR, but higher Grade≥3 irAEs. Kaplan–Meier curves for OS and RFS indicated that neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors had an acceptable long-term prognostic, but it was not possible to discern statistical differences between the three neoadjuvant subgroups. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023452437, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023452437).

immunology
Abstract CT283: KEYNOTE-966: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for the Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma

Richard S. Finn,Robin K. Kelley,Junji Furuse,Julien Edeline,Zhenggang Ren,Shu-Chih Su,Usha Malhotra,Abby B. Siegel,Juan W. Valle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-ct283

IF: 11.2

2020-01-01

Cancer Research

Abstract:Abstract Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC), including intra- or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer, is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. Most patients (pts) present with advanced or unresectable disease, for which the current first-line standard of care is gemcitabine with cisplatin. Prognosis for these pts is poor, with median survival of approximately 12 months. Pembrolizumab (pembro) has improved outcomes when combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in other tumor types (eg, gastric/GEJ, NSCLC). The randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-966 trial (NCT04003636) will be conducted to evaluate pembro plus gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in pts with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced BTC. Methods: Pts will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembro 200 mg or placebo IV every 3 weeks plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 of every 3-week cycle. Cisplatin will be given for a maximum of 8 cycles. Treatment with pembro/placebo will continue for up to 35 administrations or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. Gemcitabine will be continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. Pts will be stratified by region (Asia, non-Asia), stage (locally advanced, metastatic), and site of origin (gallbladder, intrahepatic CCA, or extrahepatic CCA). Key eligibility criteria are age ≥18 years; histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable locally advanced BTC, measurable by RECIST v1.1; no prior systemic therapy for advanced BTC; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and tumor sample adequate for biomarker analyses. Pts with past or ongoing hepatitis C or controlled hepatitis B virus infection are eligible per protocol-defined criteria. During the initial stage, response will be assessed by imaging every 6 weeks until week 54 and every 12 weeks thereafter. Safety, assessed by CTCAE v.5.0, will be monitored throughout the study and for 30 days after treatment end or 90 days for serious adverse events. The primary end points are progression-free survival (as assessed by blinded independent central review) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points are objective response rate, duration of response, and safety. Additional analyses will include disease control rate, health-related quality of life (by EORTC QLQ-C30, EuroQol EQ-5D, and EORTC QLQ-BIL21), and molecular and genetic biomarkers. The study opened to recruitment on September 24, 2019. Recruitment is underway in 17 countries and will continue until approximately 788 pts are enrolled. Citation Format: Richard S. Finn, Robin K. Kelley, Junji Furuse, Julien Edeline, Zhenggang Ren, Shu-Chih Su, Usha Malhotra, Abby B. Siegel, Juan W. Valle. KEYNOTE-966: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin for the treatment of advanced biliary tract carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT283.
Bladder-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: A single-center, single-arm clinical study of sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by tislelizumab neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Yu Zeng,Changqi Li,Chengcheng Lv,Cheng Fu,Ang Chen,Shui Fu,Huan Bi,Guangyi Shan,Yiding Wang,Zhe Wang,Qiang Liu,Bo Shao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.596

IF: 45.3

2024-01-31

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:596 Background: Althoughradical cystectomy (RC) in combination with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the gold-standard for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC), bladder-sparing treatment have emerged to be an alternative choice for patients who are concerning about the life quality after surgery. The optimal strategy for bladder-sparing treatment such as trimodal therapy (TMT) showed similar effect with RC. Since the TRUCE-01 has illuminated considerable response of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in MIBC, we aim to study whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy can improve the bladder-sparing rate in MIBC patients. Methods: 30 planned patients with MIBC (T2-4a N0-1 M0) received cisplatin 70 mg/m 2 or carboplatin AUC 4.5 on days 1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on the 1st and 8th day of each 21-day cycle x 4 cycles. Tislelizumab 200 mg was administered on the 14th day of each 21-day cycle at the 3rd and 4th cycles. CT and cystoscopy imaging were carried out to evaluate disease progression. After the 4th treatment, radical cystectomy, partial cystectomy or TURBT were perform in accordance with the disease status. For continuous bladder-spare treatment, 2 additional cycles of tislelizumab were performed. Bladder-sparing rate was settled as exploratory endpoints based on 2-years follow-up and predictive biomarker will be analyzed. Results: To date, 21 of 30 pts have been enrolled and 17 pts have completed the regimen. 2 pts were excluded because of complicating with other disease (suffering cerebral infraction or rectal cancer during the trail), and 2 pts voluntarily quitted due to intolerance of chemotherapeutic adverse effect (fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms). 2 pts partially response to the therapy and received RC after disease progression. 1 pt have no response to the therapy and received palliative care as unsuitable for surgery. The resting 10 of 17 pts successfully preserved their bladder by achieving pT0 (58.8%) after treatment. Among them 3 pts have been followed up over 1 year and no relapse was observed. Conclusions: These data support neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy a feasible bladder-sparing choice for patients with MIBC. Further completed follow-up data and biomarker analysis will accurately identify patients who are suitable for this therapy. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100050763 .

oncology
78Tip KEYNOTE-966 Trial in Progress: Pembrolizumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

J. W. Valle,R. K. Kelley,J. Furuse,J. Edeline,R. S. Finn,Z. Ren,S-C. Su,U. Malhotra,A. B. Siegel,A. Vogel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.056

IF: 51.769

2020-01-01

Annals of Oncology

Abstract:Biliary tract cancer (BTC), comprising intra- and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer, is a rare and aggressive malignancy. Most patients (pts) present with advanced or unresectable disease, for which the current standard of care is gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Median survival for these pts is only 12 months, highlighting the need for more effective therapies. Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 inhibitor that has demonstrated modest antitumor activity as monotherapy in pts with previously treated BTC and has improved survival when used in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in other cancer types. KEYNOTE-966 (NCT04003636) is a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin versus placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in pts with previously untreated advanced BTC. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable BTC, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG performance status 0/1, and no prior systemic therapy for advanced BTC. Pts with past or ongoing hepatitis C or controlled hepatitis B virus infection are eligible per protocol-defined criteria. Approximately 788 pts will be randomly allocated 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo IV every 3 weeks in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 of every 3-week cycle. Pembrolizumab will be continued for ≤35 cycles or until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Gemcitabine will be continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Cisplatin will be given for a maximum of 8 cycles. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary endpoints are objective response rate, duration of response, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include disease control rate and health-related quality of life. Tumor imaging by CT or MRI will be performed every 6 weeks until week 54, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the study and graded according to NCI CTCAE v.5.0. Recruitment began in September 2019 and is underway in 19 countries. NCT04003636. Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Matthew Grzywacz, PhD, of the ApotheCom pembrolizumab team (Yardley, PA, USA) and funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

THE USE OF PSYCHOTHERAPY AND BEHAVIOR THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF AN OBSESSIONAL DISORDER: AN EXPERIMENTAL CASE STUDY

Phase 3 KEYNOTE-992 study of pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy versus placebo plus chemoradiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Perioperative Immunotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Perioperative immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

2376P Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Following Tri-Modality Treatment for Selected Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

The Escherichia coli terB sequence affects maintenance of a plasmid with the M13 phage replication origin

Phase 3 KEYNOTE-676 cohort A: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) with or without pembrolizumab for high-risk (HR) non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) that persists/recurs after BCG induction.

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Split-Dose Cisplatin Plus Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab or Placebo in Combination with Adjuvant Chemotherapy With/without Radiotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Current and recent clinical trials for perioperative systemic therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review

Muscle invasive bladder cancer: where is the field headed?

Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy or Upfront Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer

Intravesical recombinant BCG followed by perioperative chemo-immunotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): A multicenter, single arm phase 2 trial (SAKK 06/19).

Results from BLASST-1 (Bladder Cancer Signal Seeking Trial) of nivolumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing cystectomy.

Current and Future Landscape of Perioperative Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Preliminary results from a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative disitamab vedotin (RC48-ADC) plus cadonilimab (AK104, PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) for HER2-expressing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab in persons with resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract CT283: KEYNOTE-966: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for the Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma

Bladder-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: A single-center, single-arm clinical study of sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by tislelizumab neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

78Tip KEYNOTE-966 Trial in Progress: Pembrolizumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer