Abstract:Background: The optimal graft choice of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. Purpose: To compare the outcomes, especially the long-term cumulative failure rate, of ACL reconstruction using either synthetics with remnant preservation or hamstring autografts (4-strand semitendinosus and gracilis tendons). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 133 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (synthetics: n = 43; hamstring autografts: n = 90) between July 2004 and December 2007 were included. Questionnaires (Tegner activity scale, Lysholm knee scale, and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective form) were completed preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was additionally applied at 10 years’ follow-up. The physical examination was based on the 2000 IKDC form. The manual maximum side-to-side difference (KT-1000 arthrometer), single-hop test, thigh muscle atrophy, and joint degeneration (Kellgren and Lawrence classification) were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test (Mantel-Cox, 95% CI) were used to compare graft survivorship. Results: Ten years postoperatively, 111 patients were available, with 38 (88.4%) patients (mean age, 27.6 ± 9.3 years; 28 men) with synthetics and 73 (81.1%) patients (mean age, 28.6 ± 8.8 years; 64 men) with hamstring autografts. Among them, 104 patients (synthetics: n = 35 [81.4%]; hamstring autografts: n = 69 [76.7%]) completed subjective evaluations, and 89 patients (synthetics: n = 30 [69.8%]; hamstring autografts: n = 59 [65.6%]) completed objective evaluations. For hamstring autografts and synthetics, the cumulative failure rates were 8.2% and 7.9%, respectively, and the log-rank test demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves ( P = .910). At 6 months postoperatively, for hamstring autografts and synthetics, the mean Lysholm score was 83.0 ± 7.8 and 88.1 ± 7.5, respectively ( P < .001); the mean IKDC score was 83.8 ± 7.8 and 86.9 ± 4.5, respectively ( P = .036); and the mean Tegner score was 3.7 ± 1.1 and 5.0 ± 1.5, respectively ( P < .001). At 1 year postoperatively, the mean Tegner score was 5.5 ± 1.9 and 6.5 ± 2.0, respectively ( P = .011). No statistically significant difference was observed on other subjective evaluation findings, physical examination findings (overall IKDC grade A: 45.8% of hamstring autografts, 50.0% of synthetics), side-to-side difference (1.5 ± 1.5 mm for synthetics, 2.4 ± 2.1 mm for hamstring autografts), single-hop test findings (grade A: 84.7% of hamstring autografts, 93.3% of synthetics), grade A/B thigh muscle atrophy (88.1% of hamstring autografts, 93.3% of synthetics), ipsilateral radiographic osteoarthritis (55.9% of hamstring autografts, 50.0% of synthetics), and graft survivorship. Conclusion: In this prospective cohort study, primary ACL reconstruction using either synthetics with remnant preservation or hamstring autografts showed satisfactory outcomes, especially the long-term cumulative failure rate, at 10 years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes suggested that symptom relief and restoration of function might occur earlier in those with synthetics.

Determinants of regeneration and strength of hamstrings after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—fate of hamstring tendon

Hamstring Tendon Regeneration After Harvesting: A Systematic Review

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon grafts

MRI STUDY ON TENDON REGENERATION AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFTS

Hamstrings Muscle Morphology After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Factors correlating with recovery of quadriceps strength after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts

Association Between Knee Flexor Strength and Preservation of the Tibial Attachment of the Sartorial Fascia During Hamstring Tendon Harvest

The Clinical Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Anterior Tibial Muscle Tendons Allograft and Hamstring Tendon Autograft

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Semitendinosus Tendon Autograft among Paramilitary Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Surgery in a Tertiary Care Centre

Hamstrings Neuromuscular Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ACL Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Semitendinosus Versus Double-Stranded Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autograft: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Regeneration of the Semitendinosus Tendon Following Harvested for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction:an Ultrasonographic Study

Ligamentization of Autogenous Hamstring Grafts after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Long-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Either Synthetics with Remnant Preservation or Hamstring Autografts: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study

Comparison of clinical outcomes of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: autogenous patellar tendon and hamstring grafts

Functional Outcome of Single-Bundle Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Peroneus Longus Graft and Hamstring Graft: An Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Study

Single bundle hamstrings autograft preparation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: current concepts

Strength symmetry after autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

A prospective randomized controlled study of hamstring and bone-free quadriceps tendons autografts in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction

Hamstring Muscle Stiffness in Athletes with and without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction History: A Retrospective Study