Abstract:In considering the college admissions problem, almost fifty years ago, Gale and Shapley came up with a simple abstraction based on preferences of students and colleges. They introduced the concept of stability and optimality; and proposed the deferred acceptance (DA) algorithm that is proven to lead to a stable and optimal solution. This algorithm is simple and computationally efficient. Furthermore, in subsequent studies it is shown that the DA algorithm is also strategy-proof, which means, when the algorithm is played out as a mechanism for matching two sides (e.g. colleges and students), the parties (colleges or students) have no incentives to act other than according to their true preferences. Yet, in practical college admission systems, the DA algorithm is often not adopted. Instead, an algorithm known as the Boston Mechanism (BM) or its variants are widely adopted. In BM, colleges accept students without deferral (considering other colleges' decisions), which is exactly the opposite of Gale-Shapley's DA algorithm. To explain and rationalize this reality, we introduce the notion of reciprocating preference to capture the influence of a student's interest on a college's decision. This model is inspired by the actual mechanism used to match students to universities in Hong Kong. The notion of reciprocating preference defines a class of matching algorithms, allowing different degrees of reciprocating preferences by the students and colleges. DA and BM are but two extreme cases (with zero and a hundred percent reciprocation) of this set. This model extends the notion of stability and optimality as well. As in Gale-Shapley's original paper, we discuss how the analogy can be carried over to the stable marriage problem, thus demonstrating the model's general applicability.

When Do Stable Matching Mechanisms Fail? The Role of Standardized Tests in College Admissions

Timing is Everything ? An Experimental Investigation of Incomplete Information in Centralized Matching Mechanisms

Matching Mechanisms and Matching Quality: Evidence from a Top University in China.

Matching Mechanisms and Matching Quality: Evidence from a Top School in China

Reciprocating Preferences Stablize Matching: College Admissions Revisited

From Boston to Shanghai to Deferred Acceptance: Theory and Experiments on a Family of School Choice Mechanisms

Fairness of the Boston Matching Mechanism in China's College Admissions

Matching inequality and strategic behavior under the Boston mechanism: Evidence from China's college admissions

Ex-Ante Fairness under Constrained School Choice: an Experimental Approach

Time-constrained Dynamic Mechanisms for College Admissions

Expandable Preference Lists: A Mechanism for College Admissions in a Large Market

Preference Submission Timing in School Choice Matching: Testing Fairness and Efficiency in the Laboratory

Strategyproof Pareto-Stable Mechanisms for Two-Sided Matching with Indifferences

Playing on a Level Field: Sincere and Sophisticated Players in the Boston Mechanism with a Coarse Priority Structure

An empirical evaluation of Chinese college admissions reforms through a natural experiment

Chinese College Admissions Reforms : Experimental and Empirical Evaluations

Games under the Tiered Deferred Acceptance Mechanism

Stable Matching with Contingent Priorities

Ex-Ante Fairness in the Boston and Serial Dictatorship Mechanisms under Pre-Exam and Post-Exam Preference Submission

Trade-offs in School Choice: Comparing Deferred Acceptance, the Naive and the Classic Boston Mechanism

Misalignment between Test Scores and Colleges' Preferences: Chinese College Admission Reconsidered