Healthcare provider self-reported observations and behaviors regarding their role in the spiritual care of cancer patients

Elizabeth Palmer Kelly,Madison Hyer,Diamantis Tsilimigras,Timothy M. Pawlik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05957-1
IF: 3.1
2021-01-13
Supportive Care in Cancer
Abstract:PurposeThe provision of spiritual care by an interprofessional healthcare team is an important, yet frequently neglected, component of patient-centered cancer care. The current study aimed to assess the relationship between individual and occupational factors of healthcare providers and their self-reported observations and behaviors regarding spiritual care in the oncologic encounter.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to healthcare providers employed at a large Comprehensive Cancer Center. Pearson’s chi-square test and logistic regression were used to determine potential associations between provider factors and their observations and behaviors regarding spiritual care.ResultsAmong the participants emailed, 420 followed the survey link, with 340 (80.8%) participants completing the survey. Most participants were female (82.1%) and Caucasian (82.6%) with a median age was 35 years (IQR: 31–48). Providers included nurses (64.7%), physicians (17.9%), and “other” providers (17.4%). There was a difference in provider observations about discussing patient issues around religion and spirituality (R&S). Specifically, nurses more frequently inquired about R&S (60.3%), while physicians were less likely (41.4%) (p = 0.028). Also, nurses more frequently referred to chaplaincy/clergy (71.8%), while physicians and other providers more often consulted psychology/psychiatry (62.7%, p < 0.001). Perceived barriers to not discussing R&S topics included potentially offending patients (56.5%) and time limitations (47.7%).ConclusionRemoving extrinsic barriers and understanding intrinsic influences can improve the provision of spiritual care by healthcare providers.
oncology,health care sciences & services,rehabilitation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?