Abstract:Abstract Studies in semantics traditionally focus on knowledge of objects. By contrast, less is known about how objects relate to each other. In an fMRI study, we tested the hypothesis that the neural processing of categorical spatial relations between objects is distinct from the processing of the identity of objects. Attending to the categorical spatial relations compared with attending to the identity of objects resulted in greater activity in superior and inferior parietal cortices (especially on the left) and posterior middle frontal cortices bilaterally. In an accompanying lesion study, we tested the hypothesis that comparable areas would be necessary to represent categorical spatial relations and that the hemispheres differ in their biases to process categorical or coordinate spatial relations. Voxel-based lesion symptom mapping results were consistent with the fMRI observations. Damage to a network comprising left inferior frontal, supramarginal, and angular gyri resulted in behavioral impairment on categorical spatial judgments. Homologous right brain damage also produced such deficits, albeit less severely. The reverse pattern was observed for coordinate spatial processing. Right brain damage to the middle temporal gyrus produced more severe deficits than left hemisphere damage. Additional analyses suggested that some areas process both kinds of spatial relations conjointly and others distinctly. The left angular and inferior frontal gyrus processes coordinate spatial information over and above the categorical processing. The anterior superior temporal gyrus appears to process categorical spatial information uniquely. No areas within the right hemisphere processed categorical spatial information uniquely. Taken together, these findings suggest that the functional neuroanatomy of categorical and coordinate processing is more nuanced than implied by a simple hemispheric dichotomy.

Spatial Relations Are External

Substantivalism and Relationism as Bad Cartography: Why Spatial Ontology Needs a Better Map

Supporting Abstract Relational Space-Time as Fundamental without Doctrinism against Emergence

The spatial relations in GIS and their applications

Are spatial terms rooted in geometry or force-dynamics? Yes

Why manifold substantivalism is probably not a consequence of classical mechanics

Buckets of Water and Waves of Space: Why Spacetime is Probably A Substance

Relational structures of fundamental theories

Absolute versus Relational Debate: a Modern Global Version

Sentient observers and the ontology of spacetime

On the Positioning of Objects in Space

Les entités spatiales dans la langue : étude descriptive, formelle et expérimentale de la catégorisation

Representing Space in Language and Perception

The Neural Basis for Spatial Relations

Spatial Properties of ACTION Verb Semantics: Experimental Evidence for Image Schema Orientation in Transitive vs. Reciprocal Verbs and Its Implications for Ideology

From Spatial Relations to Spatial Configurations

[The subject's propriety, space, and place]

Definitions of Natural-Language Spatial Relations in GIS

Evaluation of a Spatial Relationship by the Concept of Intrinsic Spatial Distance

Spatial memory and frames of reference: How deeply do we rely on the body and the environment?

Spatiality and Corporality: The difference between Heidegger's and Merleau-Ponty's Existential Interpretation on Spatiality