Abstract:Abstract Purpose Life cycle assessment (LCA) literature evaluating environmental burdens from lithium-ion battery (LIB) production facilities lacks an understanding of how environmental burdens have changed over time due to a transition to large-scale production. The purpose of this study is hence to examine the effect of upscaling LIB production using unique life cycle inventory data representative of large-scale production. A sub-goal of the study is to examine how changes in background datasets affect environmental impacts. Method We remodel an often-cited study on small-scale battery production by Ellingsen et al. (2014), representative of operations in 2010, and couple it to updated Ecoinvent background data. Additionally, we use new inventory data to model LIB cell production in a large-scale facility representative of the latest technology in LIB production. The cell manufactured in the small-scale facility is an NMC-1:1:1 (nickel-manganese-cobalt) pouch cell, whereas in the large-scale facility, the cell produced in an NMC-8:1:1 cylindrical cell. We model production in varying carbon intensity scenarios using recycled and exclusively primary materials as input options. We assess environmental pollution–related impacts using ReCiPe midpoint indicators and resource use impacts using the surplus ore method (ReCiPe) and the crustal scarcity indicator. Results and discussion Remodelling of the small-scale factory using updated background data showed a 34% increase in greenhouse gas emissions — linked to updated cobalt sulfate production data. Upscaling production reduced emissions by nearly 45% in the reference scenario (South Korean energy mix) due to a reduced energy demand in cell production. However, the emissions reduce by a further 55% if the energy is sourced from a low-carbon intensity source (Swedish energy mix), shifting almost all burden to upstream supply chain. Regional pollution impacts such as acidification and eutrophication show similar trends. Toxic emissions also reduce, but unlike other impacts, they were already occurring during mining and ore processing. Lastly, nickel, cobalt, and lithium use contribute considerably to resource impacts. From a long-term perspective, copper becomes important from a resource scarcity perspective. Conclusions Upscaling LIB production shifts environmental burdens to upstream material extraction and production, irrespective of the carbon intensity of the energy source. Thus, a key message for the industry and policy makers is that further reductions in the climate impacts from LIB production are possible, only when the upstream LIB supply chain uses renewable energy source. An additional message to LCA practitioners is to examine the effect of changing background systems when evaluating maturing technologies.

Extended life cycle assessment reveals the spatially-explicit water scarcity footprint of a lithium-ion battery storage

Carbon and water footprint of battery-grade lithium from brine and spodumene: A simulation-based LCA

S-LCA of lithium mining in Chile and its potential impacts on water and the local community

Social life cycle assessment of lithium iron phosphate battery production in China, Japan and South Korea based on external supply materials

An In-Depth Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Lithium-Ion Battery for Climate Impact Mitigation Strategies

Environmental Impacts of Lithium Supply Chains from Australia to China

An improved resource midpoint characterization method for supply risk of resources: integrated assessment of Li-ion batteries

The Cobalt Supply Chain and Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage Systems

Environmental Impacts of Lithium Production Showing the Importance of Primary Data of Upstream Process in Life-Cycle Assessment.

Integration of future water scarcity and electricity supply into prospective LCA: Application to the assessment of water desalination for the steel industry

An Extended Approach to the Evaluation of Energy Storage Systems: A Case Study of Li-Ion Batteries

Life‐Cycle Assessment Considerations for Batteries and Battery Materials

Environmental life cycle implications of upscaling lithium-ion battery production

Integrated Assessment of Deep Eutectic Solvents Questions Solvometallurgy As a Sustainable Recycling Approach for Lithium-Ion Batteries

A social life cycle assessment of vanadium redox flow and lithium‐ion batteries for energy storage

Spatially explicit life cycle assessments reveal hotspots of environmental impacts from renewable electricity generation

From power to plants: unveiling the environmental footprint of lithium batteries

Water as a Sustainable Leaching Agent for the Selective Leaching of Lithium from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries

Water scarcity footprint and water saving potential for large-scale green hydrogen generation: Evidence from coal-to-hydrogen substitution in China

Material Flow Analysis of Lithium in China

Life cycle environmental impacts of pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical recovery processes for spent lithium-ion batteries: present and future perspectives