Abstract:Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) adversely affects the psychological (i.e., depression, anxiety) and marital adjustment of patients and their spouses. Dyadic coping refers to how couples cope with stress. It includes positive actions like sharing practical or emotional concerns (i.e., problem- and emotion-focused stress communication; PFSC, EFSC), and engaging in problem- or emotion-focused actions to support each other (problem- and emotion-focused dyadic coping; PFDC, EFDC). It also includes negative actions like avoidance (negative dyadic coping; NEGDC). In this secondary analysis of a randomized pilot trial of a couple-based intervention called SHARE (Spouses coping with the Head And neck Radiation Experience), we first examined associations between patients' and spouses' dyadic coping (and satisfaction with dyadic coping; SATDC) and their own/each other's psychological and marital adjustment. Next, we examined the effects of SHARE relative to usual medical care (UMC) on patients' and spouses' dyadic coping. Finally, we examined whether changes in dyadic coping were associated with changes in patients' and spouses' psychological and marital adjustment. Methods and Measures: Thirty HNC patients (80% men) and their spouses (N = 60) completed baseline surveys prior to initiating radiotherapy (RT) and were randomized to SHARE or UMC. One month after RT, they completed follow-up surveys. Results: Baseline multilevel Actor-Partner Interdependence Models revealed significant actor effects of PFSC (effect size r = -0.32) and PFDC (r = -0.29) on depression. For marital adjustment, significant actor effects were found for PFSC, PFDC, EFDC, and SATDC (p < 0.05, r = 0.23 to 0.38). Actor (r = -0.35) and partner effects (r = -0.27) for NEGDC were also significant. Moderate to large effect sizes were found in favor of SHARE on PFSC (Cohen's d = 1.14), PFDC (d = 0.64), NEGDC (d = -0.68), and SATDC (d = 1.03). Improvements in PFDC were associated with reductions in depression and anxiety (p < 0.05); and, improvements in SATDC were associated with improvements in anxiety and marital adjustment (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The SHARE intervention improved positive and decreased negative dyadic coping for patients and spouses. Increases in positive dyadic coping were also associated with improvements in psychological and marital adjustment. Although findings are preliminary, more research on ways to integrate dyadic coping into oncology supportive care interventions appears warranted.

Dyadic coping and social support: Various types of support in hematooncological patients and their spouses—Associations with psychological distress

[Dyadic Coping of Patients with Haemato-Oncological Diseases and their Partners: Discrepancy Indexes and Association with Social Support and Psychological Distress]

The relation between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with haematological cancer

Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners

Different Coping Constructs in Haematological Cancer Patients: The Influence of Dyadic on Individual Coping Interplay of DC and IC in Haematological Cancer

Couples Coping With Hematological Cancer: Support Within and Outside the Couple – Findings From a Qualitative Analysis of Dyadic Interviews

Associations between dyadic communication and dyadic coping of patients with cervical cancer and their spouses: a study utilizing the actor-partner interdependence model

Dyadic Coping in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer and Their Spouses

Social Support, Depression and Anxiety in Cancer Patient‐Relative Dyads in Early Survivorship: An Actor‐Partner Interdependence Modeling Approach

Dyadic Coping, Perceived Stress, and Marital Adjustment Among Female Cancer Patients and Spouses

Dyadic effects of coping strategies on emotional state and quality of life in prostate cancer patients and their spouses

Common dyadic coping and its congruence in couples facing breast cancer: The impact on couples' psychological distress

Dyadic effects of social support on psychological distress in patients with advanced lung cancer and spousal caregivers: The mediating role of sense of coherence

Dyadic coping in specialized palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: Effects and mediation in a randomized controlled trial

Associations between self-efficacy, distress and anxiety in cancer patient-relative dyads visiting psychosocial cancer support services: Using actor-partner interdependence modelling

Dyadic Coping Experience with Pancreatic Cancer: a Qualitative Study of Dyadic Interviews

Effect of intimacy and dyadic coping on psychological distress in pancreatic cancer patients and spousal caregivers

Recognizing and Appreciating the Partner's Support Protects Relationship Satisfaction during Cardiac Illness

The impact of self-perceived burden, caregiver burden, and dyadic coping on negative emotions in colorectal cancer patient-spousal caregiver dyads: a dyadic analysis

Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers

The association between communication behavior and psychological distress among couples coping with cancer: Actor-partner effects of disclosure and concealment