Abstract:Objective. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between individual coping (IC) and dyadic coping (DC), more specifically the respective predictive impact of DC and sociodemographic, partnership-related, and medical variables on IC in haematological cancer patients. Methods. In this multicenter longitudinal study, we examined DCI (Dyadic Coping Inventory) and IC (Freiburg Questionnaire on Coping with Illness) in 214 haematological cancer patients after their treatment and six months later. Associations between the coping constructs were calculated using Pearson correlations. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictive impact of patient-specific variables on IC strategies. Results. Pearson correlation revealed numerous significant associations between DC and IC at the baseline and follow-up, but none of them yielded r ≥ 0.4 ( p < 0.01 ). Regression analyses showed a predictive impact of supportive DC on compliance ( p < 0.05 ) and of common DC on active IC ( p < 0.01 ). Concerning patient-specific variables, age stood out as a positive predictor of trivialization ( p < 0.001 ) and compliance ( p < 0.01 ) and psychological distress as a predictor of depressive IC ( p < 0.001 ), distraction ( p < 0.05 ), and trivialization ( p < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Our results indicate that patients’ personal characteristics, such as age and psychological distress, outweigh the influence of DC on IC in haematological cancer patients.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the relationship between individual coping (IC) and dyadic coping (DC), particularly the predictive impact of DC and socio-demographic, relationship-related, and medical variables on IC. The study subjects are patients with hematologic malignancies. ### Research Background Hematologic malignancies include various subtypes, ranging from aggressive to chronic, each with unique characteristics and progression rates. Compared to solid tumors, hematologic malignancies are known for their aggressiveness, chronicity, and severe side effects, which often lead to multiple physical, psychological, emotional, and social consequences for patients. Highly aggressive treatments, such as high-dose chemotherapy, total body irradiation, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), require patients to undergo mandatory isolation, causing significant stress for both patients and their partners. To cope with these challenges, patients can adopt individual coping and dyadic coping strategies. The latter describes how couples jointly cope with shared stress through a collaborative process. ### Research Objectives 1. **Explore the changes in DC and IC strategies over time**: Analyze the changes in DC and IC strategies of patients post-treatment and six months later. 2. **Analyze the association between DC and IC at baseline (t1) and follow-up (t2)**: Evaluate the correlation between DC and IC at baseline and follow-up. 3. **Examine the predictive impact of baseline DC and socio-demographic, relationship-related, and medical variables on follow-up IC**: Analyze the predictive role of DC and other variables on patients' IC at follow-up. ### Main Findings 1. **Time Changes in DC and IC**: - There were no significant changes in DC at baseline and follow-up. - Positive coping strategies in IC significantly decreased at follow-up. 2. **Correlation between DC and IC**: - There were some significant but weak correlations between DC at baseline and IC at follow-up. - Common DC at baseline had the strongest correlation with positive IC at follow-up (r = 0.34). 3. **Predictive Factors**: - **Socio-demographic Variables**: - Older patients were more likely to use trivialization and compliance coping strategies. - Patients with higher socio-economic status (SES) used trivialization coping strategies less. - **Relationship-related Variables**: - Longer partner relationships were associated with less use of trivialization coping strategies. - Higher partner satisfaction was associated with less use of depressive coping strategies. - **Medical Variables**: - Patients who had undergone stem cell transplantation used trivialization coping strategies less. - The higher the level of psychological distress in patients, the more they used depressive, distraction, and trivialization coping strategies. - **Dyadic Coping**: - Supportive DC at baseline had a significant positive predictive effect on compliance coping strategies at follow-up. - Common DC at baseline had a significant positive predictive effect on positive coping strategies at follow-up. ### Conclusion The study results indicate that patients' personal characteristics, such as age and psychological distress, have a greater impact on IC than DC. Understanding the interaction between DC and IC and their potential predictive factors can help clinicians improve psycho-oncological treatment and better understand the general determinants of IC.

Different Coping Constructs in Haematological Cancer Patients: The Influence of Dyadic on Individual Coping Interplay of DC and IC in Haematological Cancer

[Dyadic Coping of Patients with Haemato-Oncological Diseases and their Partners: Discrepancy Indexes and Association with Social Support and Psychological Distress]

The relation between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with haematological cancer

Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners

Dyadic coping and social support: Various types of support in hematooncological patients and their spouses—Associations with psychological distress

Associations between dyadic communication and dyadic coping of patients with cervical cancer and their spouses: a study utilizing the actor-partner interdependence model

Couples Coping With Hematological Cancer: Support Within and Outside the Couple – Findings From a Qualitative Analysis of Dyadic Interviews

Dyadic coping and related factors among couples with colorectal cancer: A latent profile analysis

Common dyadic coping and its congruence in couples facing breast cancer: The impact on couples' psychological distress

Dyadic Coping in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer and Their Spouses

Dyadic Coping in Couples With Breast Cancer in China

Dyadic coping in specialized palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: Effects and mediation in a randomized controlled trial

Relationship between family resilience and dyadic coping in colorectal cancer patients and their spouses, based on the actor-partner interdependence model

Effect of intimacy and dyadic coping on psychological distress in pancreatic cancer patients and spousal caregivers

Dyadic Coping Experience with Pancreatic Cancer: a Qualitative Study of Dyadic Interviews

Dyadic effects of coping strategies on emotional state and quality of life in prostate cancer patients and their spouses

Social Support, Depression and Anxiety in Cancer Patient‐Relative Dyads in Early Survivorship: An Actor‐Partner Interdependence Modeling Approach

Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers

Dyadic coping in young and middle-aged women with gynecological cancer: a latent class analysis

Distinct Dyadic Coping Profiles in Chinese Couples with Breast Cancer

The Congruence and Interrelationship: A Dyadic Perspective on the Subjective Cognitive Impairment in the Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Their Spousal Caregivers