Typologies of attentional networks
Amir Raz,Jason Buhle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1903
IF: 38.755
2006-05-01
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Abstract:Key PointsAttention is both the preparedness for and mental selection of certain aspects of the physical environment or ideas in one's mind. Several researchers have argued that there might be more than one singular form of attention. Converging data from behavioural, imaging, electrophysiological, developmental and genetic assay studies provide compelling evidence that alerting, orienting and executive attention constitute three largely independent networks.Alerting defines the ability to increase and maintain response readiness in preparation for an impending stimulus. It is task-specific and can be distinguished from the domain-general cognitive control of arousal. Neuroimaging studies have shown activity in the frontal and parietal regions, particularly of the right hemisphere, when people are required to achieve and maintain the alert state.Orienting is the ability to select specific information from among multiple sensory stimuli, and can be either overt or covert, and either exogenous or endogenous. The pulvinar, superior colliculus, superior parietal lobe, temporoparietal junction, superior temporal lobe and frontal eye fields are often activated in studies of the orienting network.Executive attention describes the monitoring and resolution of conflict between computations in different neural areas. Imaging studies have identified the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in cognitive conflict tasks, and activation in the rostral ACC after the commission of errors. Whether the ACC monitors or resolves conflict is not clear, but ACC function seems to preferentially relate to conflict at the response level.It is possible to test the limits of attentional functions by examining healthy participants under atypical conditions. Recent demonstrations using suggestion kept the experimental design unspoiled and manipulated the participants' attention instead. Extensive attention training, such as that seen in those that are experts at meditation, could allow for the rapid and volitional shifts of alternate attentional profiles.The three-network theory might not be falsifiable in the Popperian sense, as it allows for the simultaneous independence and dependence of the individual networks. Nevertheless, this model has served a valuable heuristic purpose, generating a large body of research from which new theories and empirical findings have evolved. In the future, this theory could be extended and revised to permit more testable predictions as additional research is conducted using new methodologies.In this age of information explosion, conceptual tools are as important as technological ones. The exponential increase in the number of articles published on attention each year has resulted in a fragmenting of research into highly specialized yet isolated subfields. Adopting a big-picture approach that encompasses a clear formulation of different typologies and nomenclatures would probably allow for better management of experimental findings, which, in turn, would lead to a more focused and cohesive research agenda in the quest to elucidate human attention.
neurosciences