Abstract:Video-based assessment (VBA) is gaining traction as an adjunctive, and potentially alternative, method to more traditional assessments of surgical technical skills during residency training and may someday play a role in professional certification. 1 In this issue of JAMA Network Open , Ketel et al 2 report the use of a previously developed, video-based, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) competency assessment tool (CAT) 3 to examine the association between the intraoperative technical quality of how MIE is performed at 15 Dutch hospitals and postoperative complications. Similar to the initial seminal work reporting an association of technical quality with better patient outcomes, the authors used masked reviewers with expertise in MIE and found that hospitals with better overall technical quality in the performance of the operation had lower intraoperative and severe postoperative complication rates and better performance during the anastomosis phase was associated with lower leak rates. 2 This important work supports the concept that superior technical skill is associated with better patient outcomes. 4 ,5 It also builds on prior work by suggesting that expertise within the team (rather than just the individual) may be similarly critical. The association between better performance during the creation of anastomosis phase and lower postoperative leak rates is particularly compelling because it suggests that experts can accurately identify technical quality during the most critical steps of a procedure. However, as with anything, the devil is in the details. Therefore, we must consider the nuances of these data to fully understand their meaning and how they might eventually be operationalized. For example, hospitals that performed in the highest quartile of MIE-CAT score had a significantly lower rate of severe postoperative complications compared with those in the lowest quartile (18.7% in the highest quartile vs 39.2% in the lowest quartile). We should exercise caution, however, in interpreting this association because many postoperative complications may be affected by numerous other relevant patient-, process-, and hospital-level factors above and beyond the technical quality of the intraoperative care delivered. Another important nuance is the stratification of performance into quartiles for the purposes of this analysis. While there is certainly precedent for using this type of stratification and it is often necessary for presenting data in a cohesive and interpretable manner, our natural tendency is to equate lower-ranked performance with worse outcomes. However, this type of oversimplification can be problematic because technical ability spans a range (rather than a static rank), and increments within that range may not necessarily translate into clinically meaningful differences. Furthermore, performance may be associated differently with different outcomes, some of which may or may not be expected to be directly associated with better performance. For instance, in this study, R0 resection, lymph node yield, and 30-day mortality were not clearly associated with hospital MIE-CAT performance. While intraoperative technical quality may not necessarily directly affect postoperative mortality, it might have been reasonable to expect an association with R0 resection and lymph node yield. Because they weren't, this finding begs the question of why intraoperative and postoperative complications were associated while these other outcomes were not. It may simply be that these findings are a reminder that the goal is not, and should not be, numeric performance alone but, rather, clinically relevant competence. Because skill level represents a spectrum and a variety of skill levels may achieve the same desired result, as VBA becomes more common and takes on a larger role in evaluating surgical competence, it will be imperative to continue to anchor technical skill (as measured with these types of tools) to clinically relevant patient outcomes. A critical challenge highlighted by this study is the relatively labor-intensive nature of creating footage and completing assessments as part of VBA. That the authors cite an unfeasible workload as the main reason they could only use 2 representative videos to create a hospital-level assessment speaks directly to this concern. While the smaller team sizes at the Dutch hospitals included in this study may have facilitated a limited number of videos providing a generalizable representation of each hospital's performance, we cannot know what we haven't seen. With only 30 total videos assessed from the 15 hospitals that treated the 970 patients included in the study, potential explanations for these findings may be that (1) the authors have identified a tool that generalizes perfectly (with minimal data) to all the surgical team members and patients underg -Abstract Truncated-

Video is better: why aren’t we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review

Barriers to the adoption of routine surgical video recording: a mixed-methods qualitative study of a real-world implementation of a video recording platform

Current trends and barriers to video management and analytics as a tool for surgeon skilling

For Your Eyes Only? The Use of Surgical Videos in Urological Residency Training: A European-wide Survey

Attitudes and barriers toward video visits in surgical care: Insights from a nationwide survey among surgeons

The Feasibility and Efficacy of Video Education with Individual Review in Early Surgical Education

Video technology to advance safety in the operating room and perioperative environment

The future of visual documentation? Assessing the use of videography in facial plastic surgery.

Expanded Access to Video-Based Laparoscopic Skills Assessments: Ease, Reliability, and Accuracy

Automated analysis of operative video in surgical training: scoping review

Video-Based Assessment of Surgical Quality

Spread, Scale-up, and Sustainability of Video Consulting in Health Care: Systematic Review and Synthesis Guided by the NASSS Framework

Evolution of the digital operating room: the place of video technology in surgery

Trauma video review through the legal lens: Improving care while minimizing risk

Is Video-Based Education an Effective Method in Surgical Education? A Systematic Review

SAGES video acquisition framework-analysis of available OR recording technologies by the SAGES AI task force

Adoption of routine surgical video recording: a nationwide freedom of information act request across England and Wales

How to Develop an Online Video for Teaching Health Procedural Skills: Tutorial for Health Educators New to Video Production

Video review for measuring and improving skill in urological surgery

Video observation of anesthesia practice: a useful and reliable tool for quality improvement initiatives

Effect of video-based self-reflection on intraoperative skills: A pilot randomized controlled trial