Abstract:Video-based assessment (VBA) is gaining traction as an adjunctive, and potentially alternative, method to more traditional assessments of surgical technical skills during residency training and may someday play a role in professional certification. 1 In this issue of JAMA Network Open , Ketel et al 2 report the use of a previously developed, video-based, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) competency assessment tool (CAT) 3 to examine the association between the intraoperative technical quality of how MIE is performed at 15 Dutch hospitals and postoperative complications. Similar to the initial seminal work reporting an association of technical quality with better patient outcomes, the authors used masked reviewers with expertise in MIE and found that hospitals with better overall technical quality in the performance of the operation had lower intraoperative and severe postoperative complication rates and better performance during the anastomosis phase was associated with lower leak rates. 2 This important work supports the concept that superior technical skill is associated with better patient outcomes. 4 ,5 It also builds on prior work by suggesting that expertise within the team (rather than just the individual) may be similarly critical. The association between better performance during the creation of anastomosis phase and lower postoperative leak rates is particularly compelling because it suggests that experts can accurately identify technical quality during the most critical steps of a procedure. However, as with anything, the devil is in the details. Therefore, we must consider the nuances of these data to fully understand their meaning and how they might eventually be operationalized. For example, hospitals that performed in the highest quartile of MIE-CAT score had a significantly lower rate of severe postoperative complications compared with those in the lowest quartile (18.7% in the highest quartile vs 39.2% in the lowest quartile). We should exercise caution, however, in interpreting this association because many postoperative complications may be affected by numerous other relevant patient-, process-, and hospital-level factors above and beyond the technical quality of the intraoperative care delivered. Another important nuance is the stratification of performance into quartiles for the purposes of this analysis. While there is certainly precedent for using this type of stratification and it is often necessary for presenting data in a cohesive and interpretable manner, our natural tendency is to equate lower-ranked performance with worse outcomes. However, this type of oversimplification can be problematic because technical ability spans a range (rather than a static rank), and increments within that range may not necessarily translate into clinically meaningful differences. Furthermore, performance may be associated differently with different outcomes, some of which may or may not be expected to be directly associated with better performance. For instance, in this study, R0 resection, lymph node yield, and 30-day mortality were not clearly associated with hospital MIE-CAT performance. While intraoperative technical quality may not necessarily directly affect postoperative mortality, it might have been reasonable to expect an association with R0 resection and lymph node yield. Because they weren't, this finding begs the question of why intraoperative and postoperative complications were associated while these other outcomes were not. It may simply be that these findings are a reminder that the goal is not, and should not be, numeric performance alone but, rather, clinically relevant competence. Because skill level represents a spectrum and a variety of skill levels may achieve the same desired result, as VBA becomes more common and takes on a larger role in evaluating surgical competence, it will be imperative to continue to anchor technical skill (as measured with these types of tools) to clinically relevant patient outcomes. A critical challenge highlighted by this study is the relatively labor-intensive nature of creating footage and completing assessments as part of VBA. That the authors cite an unfeasible workload as the main reason they could only use 2 representative videos to create a hospital-level assessment speaks directly to this concern. While the smaller team sizes at the Dutch hospitals included in this study may have facilitated a limited number of videos providing a generalizable representation of each hospital's performance, we cannot know what we haven't seen. With only 30 total videos assessed from the 15 hospitals that treated the 970 patients included in the study, potential explanations for these findings may be that (1) the authors have identified a tool that generalizes perfectly (with minimal data) to all the surgical team members and patients underg -Abstract Truncated-

Video observation of anesthesia practice: a useful and reliable tool for quality improvement initiatives

Remote video auditing with real-time feedback in an academic surgical suite improves safety and efficiency metrics: a cluster randomised study

Neonatal resuscitation for the preterm infant: evidence versus practice

Intubation Success after Introduction of a Quality Assurance Program Using Video Laryngoscopy

Audiovisual Modules to Enhance Informed Consent in the ICU: A Pilot Study

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Simulation Study to Investigate the Effect of Audiovisual Decision Support on Diagnosis and Therapeutic Interventions

Video-Based Assessment of Surgical Quality

Video is better: why aren’t we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review

Old Dog, New Trick: Efficacy of Self-Directed Procedural Training for Attending Critical Care Physicians

Simulation-Based Learning to Assess and Improve Critical Care Transport Team Members' Knowledge of Pediatric Intubation: A Quality Improvement Project

Coaching inexperienced clinicians before a high stakes medical procedure: randomized clinical trial

Initial Experience of Using First-Person Wearable Video Recording Technology during Central Venous Catheter Placement in the Cardiac Operating Room

Development of the obstetric unanticipated difficult video-laryngoscopy algorithm through a quality improvement randomized open-label in situ simulation study

Creation of a Patient Information Video to Improve the Patient Experience of the Surgical Assessment Unit

YouTube as a source of education in perioperative anesthesia for patients and trainees: a systematic review

Improving Emergency Airway Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Levels of Outpatient Gastroenterology Staff via Implementation of Online Education and In Situ Simulation

An observer tool to enhance learning of incoming anesthesia residents' skills during simulation training of central venous catheter insertion: a randomized controlled trial

Assessment of the Peripheral Venous Cannulation in a Teaching Hospital: A Prospective Study

Prevention of Neonatal Unplanned Extubations in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a Best Practice Implementation Project

Current trends and barriers to video management and analytics as a tool for surgeon skilling

Reigniting Intensive Care Unit Liberation