Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Introduction</h3><p>Endovascular therapy is the standard of care for severe acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, but there is a debate on the optimal anesthetic approach during this therapy. Meta-analyses of observational studies suggest that general anesthesia increases disability and death compared with conscious sedation However, their results are conflicting. This meta-analysis study was performed to assess the relationship between the effects of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Through a systematic literature search up to August 2020, 18 studies included 4,802 subjects at baseline with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke and reported a total of 1,711 subjects using general anesthesia and 1,961 subjects using conscious sedation were found. They recorded relationships between the effects of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Odds ratio (OR) or Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated between the effect of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke using the dichotomous or contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>No significant difference were found between general anesthesia and conscious sedation during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke in functional independence at 90 days (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.44–1.40, <i>p</i> = 40); successful recanalization at 24 hr (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.62–2.41, <i>p</i> = 55); mortality at 90 days (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.83–2.24, <i>p</i> = .22); interventional complication (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.76–2.02, <i>p</i> = .40); symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41–0.99, <i>p</i> = .05); aspiration pneumonia (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.58–1.58, <i>p</i> = .87); and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score after 24 hr (MD, 0.38; 95% CI, −1.15–1.91, <i>p</i> = .62); with relative relationship favoring general anesthesia only in decreasing the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>General anesthesia has no independent relationship compared to conscious sedation during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with a relative relationship favoring general anesthesia only in decreasing the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p>This relationship encouraged us to recommend either anesthetic strategy during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with no possible fear of higher complication.</p></section>

Anesthetics management strategy for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. A proposal for anesthetic approach

Progress of anesthetic strategy of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke

Anesthetic variation and potential impact of anesthetics used during endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke

Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke-Specific Focus on Anesthetic Management for Mechanical Thrombectomy

Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy for Stroke

Anesthetic Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: An Overview

Type of anesthesia for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: A literature review and meta-analysis

Anesthetic Management of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke During COVID-19 Pandemic: Consensus Statement From Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology & Critical Care (SNACC)

The efficacy and safety of general anesthesia vs. conscious sedation for endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of Anesthesia Mode During Endovascular Treatment on Neurological Functional Outcomes in Patients with Acute Posterior Circulation Stroke

Conscious sedation compared to general anesthesia for intracranial mechanical thrombectomy: A meta‐analysis

Local Anesthesia Vs General Anesthesia During Endovascular Therapy for Acute Posterior Circulation Stroke.

General Anesthesia vs Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Posterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke

Selection Of Patients And Anesthetic Types For Endovascular Treatment In Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials

Outcomes with General Anesthesia Compared to Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment of Medium Vessel Occlusions: Results of an International Multicentric Study

Endovascular therapy of isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion stroke with and without general anesthesia

Neuraxial anesthesia for non-neurological emergency surgery in a patient with acute ischemic stroke: a case report

Preclinical Evidence Toward the Use of Ketamine for Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator-Mediated Thrombolysis Under Anesthesia or Sedation

Anesthetic Considerations in Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A Clinical Case Study

Endovascular Treatment or General Treatment: How Should Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Choose to Benefit from Them the Most?

Anesthetic Postconditioning in Acute Brain Injury— Anesthetics beyond Anesthesia