Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Introduction</h3><p>Endovascular therapy is the standard of care for severe acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, but there is a debate on the optimal anesthetic approach during this therapy. Meta-analyses of observational studies suggest that general anesthesia increases disability and death compared with conscious sedation However, their results are conflicting. This meta-analysis study was performed to assess the relationship between the effects of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Through a systematic literature search up to August 2020, 18 studies included 4,802 subjects at baseline with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke and reported a total of 1,711 subjects using general anesthesia and 1,961 subjects using conscious sedation were found. They recorded relationships between the effects of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Odds ratio (OR) or Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated between the effect of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke using the dichotomous or contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>No significant difference were found between general anesthesia and conscious sedation during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke in functional independence at 90 days (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.44–1.40, <i>p</i> = 40); successful recanalization at 24 hr (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.62–2.41, <i>p</i> = 55); mortality at 90 days (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.83–2.24, <i>p</i> = .22); interventional complication (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.76–2.02, <i>p</i> = .40); symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41–0.99, <i>p</i> = .05); aspiration pneumonia (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.58–1.58, <i>p</i> = .87); and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score after 24 hr (MD, 0.38; 95% CI, −1.15–1.91, <i>p</i> = .62); with relative relationship favoring general anesthesia only in decreasing the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>General anesthesia has no independent relationship compared to conscious sedation during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with a relative relationship favoring general anesthesia only in decreasing the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p>This relationship encouraged us to recommend either anesthetic strategy during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with no possible fear of higher complication.</p></section>

General anesthesia versus conscious sedation in mechanical thrombectomy for patients with acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis

Progress of anesthetic strategy of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke

Type of anesthesia for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: A literature review and meta-analysis

Conscious sedation compared to general anesthesia for intracranial mechanical thrombectomy: A meta‐analysis

A comparison of conscious sedation and local anesthesia for thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study

The impact of general anesthesia versus non-general anesthesia on thrombectomy outcomes by occlusion location: insights from the ETIS registry

Abstract WMP85: Outcomes in Transitioning From First-Line Conscious Sedation to General Anesthesia for Endovascular Thrombectomy

The Functional Prognosis of Rescue Conscious Sedation During Mechanical Thrombectomy on Patients with Acute Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Abstract TP184: Outcomes and Clinical Features Associated With Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia During Stroke Thrombectomy

Mechanical thrombectomy versus intravenous alteplase alone in acute isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: a systematic review

Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy for Stroke

Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

Intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy stent retrievers and aspiration devices in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

General Anesthesia May Have Similar Outcomes with Conscious Sedation in Thrombectomy Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Real-World Registry in China.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anesthetic Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: An Overview

Effect of Conscious Sedation vs General Anesthesia on Early Neurological Improvement Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Effect of anesthetic strategies on distal stroke thrombectomy in the anterior and posterior cerebral artery

Differences in outcome between left-sided and right-sided mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcomes with General Anesthesia Compared to Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment of Medium Vessel Occlusions: Results of an International Multicentric Study

Mechanical thrombectomy with intra-arterial alteplase provided better functional outcomes for AIS-LVO: a meta-analysis