Abstract:This essay critically analyzes a common metaphor in political theory, which figures the growth of power as a process of “spreading” or “diffusion.” It argues that narratives that cast the generalization of power as a movement of “spreading” often fail to furnish the specific type of historical evidence that they imply, such that these narratives are frequently received as richly suggestive yet ultimately unjustified. This essay develops an alternative way of conceptualizing the generalization of power, one that rests on rigorous yet speculative evidence of the sort that political theorists are best positioned to find: not proof of literal extension or application of existing powers to new domains, but accidental convergences, isomorphisms, and ideal combinations among disparate practices that introduce large powers into the world. To do this, the essay revisits Foucault’s narrative of the generalization of disciplinary power in modern Western societies, which is perhaps the clearest source for the familiarity of the figure of “spread” in contemporary political theory. It shows that Foucault’s incessant use of the “spread” metaphor naturally invites the dismissive reading that Discipline and Punish received in many quarters, for it implies a historical process that Foucault cannot justify. Yet I argue that in a brief self-criticism, Foucault provides the rudiments for a conception of power’s generalization far more useful and compelling than the metaphoric of “spread.” I suggest that this alternative, if developed, is not just the proper frame for interpreting Foucault’s narrative, but a promising practical resource for contemporary theorists of general powers.

Biopower and Plasma: How COVID-19 Made an ANT Theorist Stop Worrying and Love Foucault

Governmentality, Science and the Media. Examining the “Pandemic Reality” with Foucault, Lyotard and Baudrillard

PODER EM MICHEL FOUCAULT E BYUNG-CHUL HAN: BIOPOLÍTICA, NEOLIBERALISMO E PSICOPOLÍTICA COMO DISPOSITIVOS PARA CONTROLAR CORPOS E PSIQUES NA SOCIEDADE INFORMACIONAL-DIGITAL

Thinking Beyond the Lockdown: On the Possibility of a Democratic Biopolitics

Michel Foucault and the Problematics of Power: Theorizing DTCA and Medicalized Subjectivity

Thinking through the Disruptive Effects and Affects of the Coronavirus with Feminist New Materialism

Network concepts in social theory: Foucault and cybernetics

The power of discourse: Michel Foucault and critical theory

The Evolution and Integration of Life and Theory in Foucault's Work on Power

Body Politics in the COVID-19 Era from a Feminist Lens

A POLITICAL TECHNOLOGY OF THE BODY: HOW LABOUR IS ORGANIZED INTO A PRODUCTIVE FORCE

I. Response to Catherine Malabou, “one Life Only: Biological Resistance, Political Resistance”

An Analysis of Foucault's Power Theory

Going Viral: The Media Anthropology of the “Quarantine Subject” in the Context of Biopolitics and Psychopolitics

Pragmatism, Artificial Intelligence, and Posthuman Bioethics: Shusterman, Rorty, Foucault

The government of life: managing populations, health and scarcity

Discipline and Power in the Digital Age. Critical Reflections from Foucault’s Thought

Socialized medicine has always been political: COVID-19, science and biopower in India

Foucault and Power: A Critique and Retheorization

DISCOURSE, KNOWLEDGE, AND POWER ON THE SOCIAL NETWORK TWITTER

Does Power “Spread”? Foucault on the Generalization of Power