Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications

Johannes Leuschner,Maximilian Schmidt,Poulami Somanya Ganguly,Vladyslav Andriiashen,Sophia Bethany Coban,Alexander Denker,Dominik Bauer,Amir Hadjifaradji,Kees Joost Batenburg,Peter Maass,Maureen van Eijnatten
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7030044
2021-03-02
Journal of Imaging
Abstract:The reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images is an active area of research. Following the rise of deep learning methods, many data-driven models have been proposed in recent years. In this work, we present the results of a data challenge that we organized, bringing together algorithm experts from different institutes to jointly work on quantitative evaluation of several data-driven methods on two large, public datasets during a ten day sprint. We focus on two applications of CT, namely, low-dose CT and sparse-angle CT. This enables us to fairly compare different methods using standardized settings. As a general result, we observe that the deep learning-based methods are able to improve the reconstruction quality metrics in both CT applications while the top performing methods show only minor differences in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). We further discuss a number of other important criteria that should be taken into account when selecting a method, such as the availability of training data, the knowledge of the physical measurement model and the reconstruction speed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?