Abstract:To succeed, democracy building in post-conflict situations requires political parties to be both competent and committed to the democratic rules of the game. Former belligerents tend to dominate. This article investigates how contextual factors and more particularly the institutional framework in which a party operates affect internal organizational dynamics, and how these in turn affect the challenges that adaptation to democratic politics pose to party leaders. It examines the nested games played by party leaders as they struggle to retain control of their parties and compete with other parties for political power. The analysis focuses on cases drawn from El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique, and shows how inter-party competition shapes the identities, priorities, tactics and strategies, which in turn affect the prospects for democratization. The role of international actors in influencing both processes and outcomes in these situations must also be taken into account, especially where democratization is viewed as a means to the end of establishing peace and not simply as goal in its own right. This chapter investigates how contextual factors and more particularly the institutional framework in which a party operates affect internal organizational dynamics, and how these in turn affect the challenges that adaptation to democratic politics pose to party leaders. It examines the nested games played by party leaders as they struggle to retain control of their parties and compete with other parties for political power. The chapter focuses on cases drawn from El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique, and shows how inter-party competition shapes the identities, priorities, tactics and strategies, which in turn affect the prospects for democratization. It explores the influence of internal organizational dynamics on challenges and responses. The chapter looks at the ways in which incentives provided by institutions interact with challenges to party leaders that are posed by the transition from battlefield to political arena. Some political arenas, such as Mozambique, are polarized for historical reasons rooted in the legacy of war and the country's development trajectory.

The role of territory in grassroots party-building: insights from Argentina

What is to be Done? How Radical Leftists Help to Solve the Problem of Personalist Party-Building in Latin America

Decentralizing electoral campaigns? New-old parties, grassroots and digital activism

Lone organizers: Opposition party-building in hostile places in Tanzania

Proximity as urban democratic legitimacy: Strategies of participation in Buenos Aires

Building Parties’ Grassroots: Electoral Systems, Party Organizations, and Social Linkages from a Cross-National Perspective

When a Movement Becomes a Party: The 2015 Barcelona City Council Election

Quotas, women's leadership and grassroots women activists: Bringing women into the party?

The construction of party membership

Activist Co-production for the Right to Occupy, Hold Ground, and Upgrade

Understanding movement parties through their communication

Party-led public participation in neighborhood governance: a comparative analysis of two forms of social networks

The geographies of collective identity in the Chilean student movement

Why do party elites incentivise activism? The case of the populist radical right

Rebels in their own job: How digging into a municipal mystery turned invited youth participation in an urban planning process into uninvited activism

Party-building on the Heels of War: El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique

Party Building as Institutional Bricolage: Asserting Authority at the Business Frontier

Political Parties and Interest Incorporation: A New Typology of Intra-Party Groups

Political Parties and Organization Studies: The party as a critical case of organizing

Local democracy and popular participation: Chile and Brazil in comparative perspective

Rootedness, Activism, and Centralization: The Case of the Swiss People’s Party