Patient perspectives and self‐rated knowledge of nerve transfer surgery for restoring upper limb function in spinal cord injury

Mariam Manna,W. Ben Mortenson,Bahareh Kardeh,Sam Douglas,Chris Marks,Emily M. Krauss,Michael J. Berger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12811
2022-03-29
PM and R
Abstract:BackgroundNerve transfer surgery has the potential to restore upper limb function in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI); however, there has been limited exploration of patient perception of nerve transfer.ObjectiveTo explore the perspectives of patients with chronic SCI (>2 years from injury) on nerve transfer surgery, and to determine if an educational intervention improved participants' perceived knowledge levels about the procedure.DesignMixed‐methods study including qualitative semi‐structured interviews and self‐reported rating scales. Pre‐ and post‐interviews were completed following an educational presentation.SettingTwo local SCI clinics.ParticipantsTen patients with chronic traumatic SCI and neurological level of injury C3‐C7 (motor complete or incomplete), recruited via snowball sampling (six male, four female).InterventionAn educational slide presentation on nerve transfer concepts.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary study outcome measure is the participants' responses to interview questions. The secondary study outcome measure is their self‐reported knowledge levels of nerve transfer before and after education.ResultsRegaining upper limb function was a priority for all participants. Although most participants had heard of nerve transfer, none were offered it at the time of their SCI, and only two stated that they had any peers who had undergone the procedure. The educational module significantly increased self‐rated scores on understanding of nerve transfer (p
rehabilitation,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?