Global trends and outcomes of nerve transfers for treatment of adult brachial plexus injuries

Christopher S Crowe,Robert J Spinner,Alexander Y Shin,Christopher S. Crowe,Robert J. Spinner,Alexander Y. Shin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241232062
2024-02-20
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Abstract:Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Ahead of Print. The presentation, management and outcomes of brachial plexus injuries are likely to be subject to regional differences across the globe. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify relevant articles related to spinal accessory to suprascapular, intercostal to musculocutaneous, and ulnar and/or median nerve fascicle to biceps and/or brachialis motor branch nerve transfers for treatment of brachial plexus injuries. A total of 6007 individual brachial plexus injuries were described with a mean follow-up of 38 months. The specific indication for accessory to suprascapular and intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers were considerably different among regions (e.g. upper plexus vs. pan-plexal), while uniform for fascicular transfer for elbow flexion (e.g. upper plexus +/− C7). Similarly, functional recovery was highly variable for accessory to suprascapular and intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers, while British Medical Research Council grade ≥3 strength after fascicular transfer for elbow flexion was frequently obtained. Overall, differences in outcomes seem to be inherent to the specific transfer being utilized.Level of evidence: III
surgery,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?