Abstract:In our everyday lives, we need to process auditory and visual temporal information as efficiently as possible. Although automatic auditory time perception has been widely investigated using an index of the mismatch negativity (MMN), the neural basis of automatic visual time perception has been largely ignored. The present study investigated the automatic processing of auditory and visual time perception employing the cross-modal delayed response oddball paradigm. In the experimental condition, the standard stimulus was 200ms and the deviant stimulus was 120ms, which were exchanged in the control condition. Reaction time, accuracy, and event-related potential (ERP) data were measured when participants performed the duration discrimination task. The ERP results showed that the MMN, N2b, and P3 were elicited by an auditory deviant stimulus under the attention condition, while only the MMN was elicited under the inattention condition. The MMN was largest over the frontal and central sites, while the difference in MMN amplitude was not significant between under the attention and inattention condition. In contrast, the change-related positivity (CRP) and the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) were elicited by the visual deviant stimulus under both the attention and inattention conditions. The CRP was largest over the occipito-temporal sites under the attention condition and over the fronto-central sites under the inattention condition. The difference in CRP amplitude was significant between the attention and inattention condition. The vMMN was largest over the parieto-occipital sites under the attention condition, and largest over the fronto-central sites under the inattention condition. The difference in vMMN amplitude was significant between the attention and inattention condition. Auditory MMN does not appear to be modulated by attention, whereas the visual CRP and the vMMN are modulated by attention. Therefore, the present study provides electrophysiological evidence for the existence of automatic visual time perception and supports an “attentional switch” hypothesis for a modality effect on duration judgments, such that auditory temporal information is processed relatively automatically, whereas visual temporal information processing requires controlled attention.

Neural Repetition Suppression Modulates Time Perception: Evidence From Electrophysiology and Pupillometry

Expected events dilate subjective duration in the auditory modality: Effects of predictability and expectation on time perception.

Event-Related Potentials (ERP) evidence of predictive coding account of time perception in the sub-second range oddball tasks

Temporal context modulates cross-modality time discrimination: Electrophysiological evidence for supramodal temporal representation

Color and time perception: Evidence for temporal overestimation of blue stimuli

Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex induces natural perceptual biases

Emotional Influences on Time Perception: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials

Differences in the Neural Basis of Automatic Auditory and Visual Time Perception: ERP Evidence from an Across-Modal Delayed Response Oddball Task

Pupil-Linked Arousal Modulates Precision of Stimulus Representation in Cortex

Duration channels mediate human time perception

Perceptual learning evidence for an interval- and modality-invariant representation of subsecond time

Sub-second and multi-second dopamine dynamics underlie variability in human time perception

Expected reward value and reward prediction errors reinforce but also interfere with human time perception

EXPRESS: Influences of Temporal and Probabilistic Expectation on Subjective Time of Emotional Stimulus

Striatal Dopamine Modulates Temporal Surprise P3a

Duration Adaptation Modulates EEG Correlates of Subsequent Temporal Encoding.

Measuring the perception and metacognition of time

The influence of temporal context on vision over multiple time scales

Stimulus Variation and Sequential Judgements of Duration

Performance-informed EEG analysis reveals mixed evidence for EEG signatures unique to the processing of time

Common neural mechanisms supporting time judgements in humans and monkeys