Affect toward the policy option versus the hazard differentially mediates cultural effects on Americans’ Zika risk perceptions and policy support: Comparing the Solution Aversion-based model and the Affect Heuristic-Cultural Cognition Theory model

Branden B. Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2048354

2022-03-30

Abstract:Surveys of Americans' views on the Zika virus allowed tests of overlapping but distinctive models of how culture affects risk responses: (1) a model inspired by the "solution aversion" (SA) hypothesis, which posits that cultural attitudes lower perceived risk when mediated by negative attitudes toward a hazard management option, and (2) the Affect Heuristic-Cultural Cognition Theory (AH-CCT) model, which posits that cultural biases can alter varied risk responses mediated by affect about the risk source or hazard. Dependent variables were personal and U.S. risk perceptions, judged need for U.S. action against Zika, and support for potential or actual Zika management options. Both models were supported, but the SA-based model (using value threat evoked by a management option as the affect mediator) was stronger overall and applied more to need and support judgments, while AH-CCT (using affect aroused by Zika as mediator) applied more to amplifying perceived risk. These results underline the value of parallel testing of models with multiple candidate measures of a limited number of concepts to enhance scientific understanding of factors affecting risk responses.