Abstract:Background: A comprehensive comparison of available data in terms of vascular complications between distal and conventional transradial access is still partial and a net benefit of such approach has not yet been clearly demonstrated. Objective: To provide an updated comparison of complications between distal and conventional transradial access used to perform coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: Data were obtained searching MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for all investigations published any time to December 22, 2020 reporting a comparison between distal and conventional transradial access. The occurrence of radial artery occlusion was chosen as the primary outcome while the hematoma at access site and spasm as secondary and tertiary outcome, respectively. Study eligibility criteria: Case-control studies comparing distal and conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. All studies included adult patients aged at least 18 years. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Overall, 7073 patients (mean age 57.9 and 58.4 years for distal and conventional transradial access, respectively), were analyzed. The rate of radial artery occlusion was significantly lower in the distal compared with the conventional group (2.1% vs 4.6%, p < 0.001). The pooled analysis, based on a fixed effect model confirmed a lower relative risk of occlusion when distal access is used (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-069, p = 0.002, I-2 = 0%). Conversely, no differences in the risk of developing a hematoma at the access site or in the occurrence of a radial artery spasms were observed comparing the two groups (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37-1.13, p = 0.12, I-2 = 0% and RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.48-1.63, p = 0.001, I-2 = 0%, respectively). Limitations: Only eight case-control studies met inclusion criteria Conclusion: This metanalysis confirmed a lower risk of radial artery occlusion using distal access and comparable performance in terms of hematoma, and radial artery spam risk.

Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Interventions in Everyday Practice: Data From the TRIANGLE Registry (TwitteR Initiated registry for coronary ANgiography in Germany via distaL radial accEss)

Distal Radial Artery Access is a Safe and Feasible Technique in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Visceral Intervention

Distal Radial Access for Coronary Procedures in a Large Prospective Multicenter Registry

Distal Transradial Access: a Safe and Feasible Approach for Coronary Catheterization in Cases of Total Radial Artery Occlusion

Distal Transradial Access Optimization: A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Characterization for the Anatomical Snuffbox

Ultrasound-guided distal transradial access for cardiac catheterization: Technical notes for the interventionalist

Coronary Catheterization Via Distal Transradial Access in Patient with Superficial Radial Artery: a Case Report.

Routine use of the transradial approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: procedural aspects and outcomes in 2209 patients treated in a single high-volume centre

Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention

Transradial access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the next standard of care?

Early prevention of radial artery occlusion via distal transradial access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention

An improved technique for gaining radial artery access in endovascular interventions.

Transradial cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review

Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention in 92 Cases

Distal radial artery palpability and successful arterial access for coronary angiography: A post-hoc analysis from two randomized trials

Distal radial access in the anatomical snuffbox for neurointerventions: a feasibility, safety, and proof-of-concept study

Traditional Versus Distal Radial Access for Coronary Diagnostic and Revascularization Procedures: Final Results of the TENDERA Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Starting a transradial programme: how to go about it?

Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Distal Trans‐Radial Access in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Distal snuffbox versus conventional radial artery access: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis