Abstract:The article analyses the issue of the NATO missile defense development and the evolution of views in the Russian political, military and expert circles. In 2009, the U. S. President Baraсk Obama declared a start of the NATO missile defense system construction with a goal to be able to intercept a limited nuclear strike from Iran. Russia is in doubt about the stated purpose of the European missile defense and considers it to be a threat to its own strategic nuclear forces. The European missile defense construction has been experiencing technical obstacles and political difficulties: the cancellation of deployment of interceptor SM‑3 IIB and delays in establishing operational capability of the Aegis Ashore land-based missile defense system in Poland. The current architecture of the NATO missile defense, which allows only to intercept a limited number of incoming warheads, has no significant impact on Russian retaliatory strike capability. Nevertheless, the missile defense in Europe remains an irritating factor in relations between Russia and the USA. Apparently, Biden’s arrival in the White House creates an opportunity for parties to address the issue during negotiations on the New START follow-on Treaty. The research addresses the history of Russia–USA–NATO cooperation on theatre missile defense and the reasons for the failure of the joint missile defense in Europe. The author justifies the reanimation of the Joint Data Exchange Center project and outlines the idea of its transformation to the Multilateral Data Exchange Center. Acknowledgments. The article was prepared within the project “Post-crisis world order: challenges and technologies, competition and cooperation” supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program for research projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (Agreement No 075-15-2020-783).

Nuclear divergence between Britain and the United States: SDI and the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty

A "Corruption of British Science?": The Strategic Defense Initiative and British Technology Policy

'Une Déception Amoureuse'? Great Britain, the Continent and European Nuclear Cooperation, 1953-57

The ‘ultimate insurance’ or an ‘irrelevance’ for national security needs? Partisanship, foreign policy attitudes, and the gender gap in British public opinion towards nuclear weapons

The Strategic Defense Initiative: Perception vs Reality

U.S. Missile Defense: from National Territory Protection to NATO Defense

Debate on SALT II

Deterrence During Disarmament: Deep Nuclear Reductions and International Security

Britain's Position on the Soviet Union's Calls for Rapprochement with Western European Countries (March-September 1969)

The unsolved issue of arms control: anti-missile dilemma

The Shaping of Nuclear Weapon System Technology: US Fleet Ballistic Missile Guidance and Navigation: I: From Polaris to Poseidon

To adapt to the Cold War bipolar order? Or to challenge it? Macmillan and de Gaulle’s rift in the face of the Second Berlin Crisis

The United States, the Israeli Nuclear Program, and Nonproliferation, 1961–69

The rise and fall of Spain's ‘nuclear exceptionalism’

Nuclear dimensions of the 1967 Middle East War: an Israeli perspective

Reducing nuclear dangers

The European Missile Defense Factor in Russia–USA/NATO Relations

From the Club of Rome to Star Wars: The Era of Limits, Space Colonization and the Origins of SDI

Shifting interests: Whitlam, Britain and French nuclear tests in the South Pacific

The Stille Allianz Revisited

Between Pacifism and Nuclear Energy (1930-1955)