Abstract:Significant collaborations with research partners in China are seen in many Western countries. With increasing US-China geopolitical tensions, governments, research institutions, and individuals in established scientific systems are increasingly required to address a proliferating array of risks and challenges associated with collaboration with China. Academic researchers are only beginning to describe how countries are responding to the ongoing need for global scientific collaboration amidst intensifying geopolitical competition. Several studies have examined the securitization of scientific connections with China in the USA, while others have documented developments in nations such as Australia, the UK, and Sweden. However, there is limited comparative research on approaches to international science amid geopolitical tensions. This paper bridges the gap, illuminating the key dimensions of variation in country-level responses by comparing the cases of Sweden and Australia. The questions we ask are as follows: Who responds to the challenges? By what means? And to what ends are responses directed? Swedish government have been largely passive, but Swedish funding agencies have developed "responsible internationalisation" guidelines that aim to induce proactive reflection by institutions and individual researchers. Australia's approach, by contrast, has centred on legislation, the exercise of ministerial powers, along with sector-wide enactment of expanded due diligence protocols. The comparison highlights key differences in the actors, methods and goals of responses to the intensifying geopolitics of scientific collaboration.

Shifting interests: Whitlam, Britain and French nuclear tests in the South Pacific

A Diplomatic Tightrope: the Whitlam Government and the Diego Garcia Dilemma

British diplomatic re-engagement in the Pacific: more than just words?

Rupture or Continuity? the Evolving Australian Approach to the Five Power Defence Arrangements from Gorton to Whitlam

Settler Colonial Strategic Culture: Australia, AUKUS, and the Anglosphere

Australia, the pacific, and the United States in the 1980s

'To Dust Off The Cobwebs': The Whitlam Government'S Failure To Completely Abolish Appeals From Australian Courts To The Privy Council

Australian External Policy and the End of Britain's Empire1

To adapt to the Cold War bipolar order? Or to challenge it? Macmillan and de Gaulle’s rift in the face of the Second Berlin Crisis

The history of Australian legal opposition to Japanese Antarctic whaling

Different fears, same alliance: Multilateralism, assurance and the origins of the 1951 United States–New Zealand–Australia alliance

Realism in Whitlam's Foreign Policy

Scientific collaboration amid geopolitical tensions: a comparison of Sweden and Australia

A clash of ontologies? Time, law, and science in Papua New Guinea

French Nuclear Testings and Consumption of French Wine in Denmark

Australia, China, And The Us In An Era Of Interdependence Irreconcilable Interests, Inadequate Institutions?

AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC INTERESTS:ACTUAL CHALLENGE AND POLICY RESPONSE

Playing the China Card? Revisiting France's Recognition of Communist China, 19631964

Sino-French Normalization and Its Impact on the United States and Taiwan

'Une Déception Amoureuse'? Great Britain, the Continent and European Nuclear Cooperation, 1953-57

Nuclear divergence between Britain and the United States: SDI and the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty